Lordeffingham said:For those on here who are continually highlighting the HUGE wages we choose to pay to assemble the best, lets get some perspective!
It was the wankers from Trafford that started this game of silly wages, to try to maintain their stranglehold on the monopoly of top tallent.
It was them again who insisted on the 'global brand' issues in merchandising to keep them ahead of any competition, so don't let any rags dare to whinge now they are down and out.
Beckham and Ferdinand were being paid around £100k a week almost ten years ago.
But to ease your minds slightly, if our owner didn't invest any of his money and never made another penny, and chose to pay each of our 1st team squad £4millon a week (that's a total weekly outlay of £100million), it would take over a hundred years before he even went close to his overdaft!
so lets stop being petty and let the ones with nowt do the worrying!
I'm not sure when it happened, but Man City fans advocating following Man Utd example?
Nice one.<br /><br />-- Mon Jul 05, 2010 8:05 am --<br /><br />
avoidconfusion said:Maybe... but I still hope that there is no truth to the story that claims that Toure is on over 220k a week because that would be absolutely ridiculous.
It's disgusting. Absolutely disgusting.
These type of wages, transfer fee's, the lack of any English or local players to see wearing the shirts of their clubs is turning me completely off football.
If we win the Prem league, with a squad of names from every country in the world, except our own, on wages of £100k to £200k a week. I will certainly have conflicting feelings.