Would the UK ever "revolt"

SWP's back said:
JoeMercer'sWay said:
SWP's back said:
Im glad nashark is not in control.

why would people be allowed to own anything? surely everyone should be equal?
Not everyone is equal in terms of ability, desire and work rate.

As I say, the only supporters of communism are those that it would benefit, the work shy, thick and unlikely to succeed.

that's me, but I don't support communism, just give me your fucking money! ;P.
 
BoyBlue_1985 said:
gordondaviesmoustache said:
BoyBlue_1985 said:
Its not how the human race has worked from the very start. Why try to make us into something we are not

It throws up so many supplementary questions my mind is starting to hurt.

So when someone dies what happens to their house? I assume their widow/widower is thrown out of their home if it is in the other persons name. And the kids as well.

What then happens to the house? Who gets it? Who decides?

I'm not entirely sure he's thought this one through. Sorry nashark it's an awful idea that won't work, and as BB '85 has said is at odds with human nature.

GDM what he is talking about is Karl Marx type socialistic communism. It has never worked and wont ever work because Marx never factored in human beings to his thinking


Trust me - what nashark envisages is absolutely nothing like 'Karl Marx type socialistic communism'.
Whatever that is.
It could possibly argued to be vaguely state collectivist,but that is where any comparison ends.
Maybe he meant Groucho Marx?
Is he still stipulating 'no queers',or has that sanction now been lifted?
Because I feel that measure will only serve to alienate the pink vote.
 
nijinsky's fetlocks said:
BoyBlue_1985 said:
gordondaviesmoustache said:
It throws up so many supplementary questions my mind is starting to hurt.

So when someone dies what happens to their house? I assume their widow/widower is thrown out of their home if it is in the other persons name. And the kids as well.

What then happens to the house? Who gets it? Who decides?

I'm not entirely sure he's thought this one through. Sorry nashark it's an awful idea that won't work, and as BB '85 has said is at odds with human nature.

GDM what he is talking about is Karl Marx type socialistic communism. It has never worked and wont ever work because Marx never factored in human beings to his thinking


Trust me - what nashark envisages is absolutely nothing like 'Karl Marx type socialistic communism'.
Whatever that is.
It could possibly argued to be vaguely state collectivist,but that is where any comparison ends.
Maybe he meant Groucho Marx?
Is he still stipulating 'no queers',or has that sanction now been lifted?
Because I feel that measure will only serve to alienate the pink vote.

In recognition of what i have wrote i also have no idea what socialistic communism is!
I thought it was Marx who said you should earn what you put in to society
I should leave my missus with the masters degree in this stuff to talk about it, vaguely listening to her when im watching tv has not worked out well
 
BoyBlue_1985 said:
nijinsky's fetlocks said:
BoyBlue_1985 said:
GDM what he is talking about is Karl Marx type socialistic communism. It has never worked and wont ever work because Marx never factored in human beings to his thinking


Trust me - what nashark envisages is absolutely nothing like 'Karl Marx type socialistic communism'.
Whatever that is.
It could possibly argued to be vaguely state collectivist,but that is where any comparison ends.
Maybe he meant Groucho Marx?
Is he still stipulating 'no queers',or has that sanction now been lifted?
Because I feel that measure will only serve to alienate the pink vote.

In recognition of what i have wrote i also have no idea what socialistic communism is!
I thought it was Marx who said you should earn what you put in to society
I should leave my missus with the masters degree in this stuff to talk about it, vaguely listening to her when im watching tv has not worked out well


No worries mate - in fairness,Marx is about as misinterpreted and selectively quoted as the bible.
'Vaguely listening' is most definitely the preferred option whenever women are talking.
Although 'nodding in approval whilst ignoring every word' runs it a close second.
 
nijinsky's fetlocks said:
BoyBlue_1985 said:
nijinsky's fetlocks said:
Trust me - what nashark envisages is absolutely nothing like 'Karl Marx type socialistic communism'.
Whatever that is.
It could possibly argued to be vaguely state collectivist,but that is where any comparison ends.
Maybe he meant Groucho Marx?
Is he still stipulating 'no queers',or has that sanction now been lifted?
Because I feel that measure will only serve to alienate the pink vote.

In recognition of what i have wrote i also have no idea what socialistic communism is!
I thought it was Marx who said you should earn what you put in to society
I should leave my missus with the masters degree in this stuff to talk about it, vaguely listening to her when im watching tv has not worked out well


No worries mate - in fairness,Marx is about as misinterpreted and selectively quoted as the bible.
'Vaguely listening' is most definitely the preferred option whenever women are talking.
Although 'nodding in approval whilst ignoring every word' runs it a close second.

Whispering under your breath *Shuuuuuuut the fuuuuuuuck uuuuuuuuuup* is the number one option.
 
gaudinho's stolen car said:
nijinsky's fetlocks said:
BoyBlue_1985 said:
In recognition of what i have wrote i also have no idea what socialistic communism is!
I thought it was Marx who said you should earn what you put in to society
I should leave my missus with the masters degree in this stuff to talk about it, vaguely listening to her when im watching tv has not worked out well


No worries mate - in fairness,Marx is about as misinterpreted and selectively quoted as the bible.
'Vaguely listening' is most definitely the preferred option whenever women are talking.
Although 'nodding in approval whilst ignoring every word' runs it a close second.

Whispering under your breath *Shuuuuuuut the fuuuuuuuck uuuuuuuuuup* is the number one option.

I thought it was to gaffa tape their mouths shut and to lock them in the cellar by chaining them to the wall?
 
JoeMercer'sWay said:
gaudinho's stolen car said:
nijinsky's fetlocks said:
No worries mate - in fairness,Marx is about as misinterpreted and selectively quoted as the bible.
'Vaguely listening' is most definitely the preferred option whenever women are talking.
Although 'nodding in approval whilst ignoring every word' runs it a close second.

Whispering under your breath *Shuuuuuuut the fuuuuuuuck uuuuuuuuuup* is the number one option.

I thought it was to gaffa tape their mouths shut and to lock them in the cellar by chaining them to the wall?
Ha. So much to learn my little strawberry.

No, you keep one (your bird) upstairs, living a normal life, completely seperate from the depravity in the cellar. Whilst she will be a pain in the arse, it helps deflect attention from all the lingerie you buy and keeps the "normal bloke" facade working well.
 
SWP's back said:
JoeMercer'sWay said:
gaudinho's stolen car said:
Whispering under your breath *Shuuuuuuut the fuuuuuuuck uuuuuuuuuup* is the number one option.

I thought it was to gaffa tape their mouths shut and to lock them in the cellar by chaining them to the wall?
Ha. So much to learn my little strawberry.

No, you keep one (your bird) upstairs, living a normal life, completely seperate from the depravity in the cellar. Whilst she will be a pain in the arse, it helps deflect attention from all the lingerie you buy and keeps the "normal bloke" facade working well.

I'm your little strawberry now? christ, I fear another session under the teatowel under duress coming on at this rate...

just as worryingly, what does that make Bob?
 
JoeMercer'sWay said:
SWP's back said:
JoeMercer'sWay said:
I thought it was to gaffa tape their mouths shut and to lock them in the cellar by chaining them to the wall?
Ha. So much to learn my little strawberry.

No, you keep one (your bird) upstairs, living a normal life, completely seperate from the depravity in the cellar. Whilst she will be a pain in the arse, it helps deflect attention from all the lingerie you buy and keeps the "normal bloke" facade working well.

I'm your little strawberry now? christ, I fear another session under the teatowel under duress coming on at this rate...

just as worryingly, what does that make Bob?
Oh. He's still a lesbian.
 
SWP's back said:
JoeMercer'sWay said:
SWP's back said:
Ha. So much to learn my little strawberry.

No, you keep one (your bird) upstairs, living a normal life, completely seperate from the depravity in the cellar. Whilst she will be a pain in the arse, it helps deflect attention from all the lingerie you buy and keeps the "normal bloke" facade working well.

I'm your little strawberry now? christ, I fear another session under the teatowel under duress coming on at this rate...

just as worryingly, what does that make Bob?
Oh. He's still a lesbian.
STILL!!
I thought he had moved on to gay dwarfs now
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.