Pigeonho
Well-Known Member
So are sarcastic comments.lloydie said:
And anyone city fan who doesn't want ronaldo because he used to play for united simply doesn't want what's best for the club. It's that simple.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Would you have Ronaldo at City?
- Thread starter Super David Silva 21
- Start date
And anyone city fan who doesn't want ronaldo because he used to play for united simply doesn't want what's best for the club. It's that simple.
I look at it a bit like the rags signing Cantona.At the time Leeds were their big rivals so there was mixed feelings at him going to the stadium of nightmares.However he propelled them to the next level and the rest is the famous 'History' word.
I don't like his antics or his arrogance but he is a world class player and his addition would take us to another level,not to mention drive the rags mad so i would take him,though i doubt we will ever sign him.
I don't like his antics or his arrogance but he is a world class player and his addition would take us to another level,not to mention drive the rags mad so i would take him,though i doubt we will ever sign him.
i kne albert davy
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Aug 2010
- Messages
- 11,241
You just posted my thoughts word for word amazing.firthy81 said:He is one of the best players in the world......... But a slimy horrible bastard on my opinion
Blue Til Death
Well-Known Member
i kne albert davy said:You just posted my thoughts word for word amazing.firthy81 said:He is one of the best players in the world......... But a slimy horrible bastard on my opinion
Surely you thought, in my opinion though....?
Pigeonho said:So are sarcastic comments.lloydie said:Pigeonho said:You really take that as having a pop? It's a good point, because how many fans of other top clubs wouldn't want one of the best players in the world? That's not having a pop in any way shape or form, so stick your oversensitivity up your arse. Fucking mard arse.
It's not a good point because there's a special relationship between City and the rags that will colour our opinions and no others which you seem incapable of grasping, wonder why.
As for the name calling, ...childish.
And anyone city fan who doesn't want ronaldo because he used to play for united simply doesn't want what's best for the club. It's that simple.
What is best for the Club is a moot point but it is perfectly arguable that there are better strategies than signing Ronaldo and alienating a section of the fanbase. There are certainly better branding strategies than signing someone so closely associated with City's bitter rivals.
These aren't necessarily arguments that I would fully defend but they're valid arguments nonetheless.
As for the sarcasm, you spotted it, well done you.
i kne albert davy
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Aug 2010
- Messages
- 11,241
Too clever for me i'm just a poor working chapBlue Til Death said:i kne albert davy said:You just posted my thoughts word for word amazing.firthy81 said:He is one of the best players in the world......... But a slimy horrible bastard on my opinion
Surely you thought, in my opinion though....?
Pigeonho
Well-Known Member
Ok well name calling and sarcasm aside, I wasn't belittling anyone for not wanting ronaldo. I just don't see one single negative in signing one of the two best players in the world from Real Madrid, as that's all it would be. He used to play for united, but that was then. If we were signing him directly from them I would still be baffled by the negativity, but I would be able to understand the ill feeling.lloydie said:Pigeonho said:So are sarcastic comments.lloydie said:It's not a good point because there's a special relationship between City and the rags that will colour our opinions and no others which you seem incapable of grasping, wonder why.
As for the name calling, ...childish.
And anyone city fan who doesn't want ronaldo because he used to play for united simply doesn't want what's best for the club. It's that simple.
What is best for the Club is a moot point but it is perfectly arguable that there are better strategies than signing Ronaldo and alienating a section of the fanbase. There are certainly better branding strategies than signing someone so closely associated with City's bitter rivals.
These aren't necessarily arguments that I would fully defend but they're valid arguments nonetheless.
As for the sarcasm, you spotted it, well done you.
Some on here in recent years have said they wouldn't have him and then gone onto say, 'I would prefer that we make our own superstar in balotelli'. That went well then.
Nothing wrong with buying a finished article of world class talent, united history or not.
GXCity
Well-Known Member
Ronaldo at City? 100% yes. No one would get near us in the PL and we would be contenders for the CL.
gordondaviesmoustache
Well-Known Member
*strokes chin*lloydie said:Pigeonho said:So are sarcastic comments.lloydie said:It's not a good point because there's a special relationship between City and the rags that will colour our opinions and no others which you seem incapable of grasping, wonder why.
As for the name calling, ...childish.
And anyone city fan who doesn't want ronaldo because he used to play for united simply doesn't want what's best for the club. It's that simple.
What is best for the Club is a moot point but it is perfectly arguable that there are better strategies than signing Ronaldo and alienating a section of the fanbase. There are certainly better branding strategies than signing someone so closely associated with City's bitter rivals.
These aren't necessarily arguments that I would fully defend but they're valid arguments nonetheless.
As for the sarcasm, you spotted it, well done you.