Vidal of course. the board arent amateurs that if yaya leaves they wont replace him or replace him with zuculini..KiLP12 said:If he does end up leaving, surely Fernandinho will take Yaya's position and Fernando Fernandinho's position? Garcia will stay and City will be looking for another holding midfielder if Rodwell's not staying. Perhaps Zucullini? Or will he be loaned out too? I don't know just a bit confused now with this Yaya situation.
Chrisdunk said:Are you an idiot? Why the fuck would he lie about something like this?dancity19 said:If this isn't true, and I hope, and assume it isn't, then we need to get rid really.
Keeping him would almost seem like admitting it? He can't be so slanderous about us as a club, and paint us in this light, least of all the owners. They want to be seen in the best possible light all over the world, and by all accounts didn't want certain players at the club due to bad publicity they may bring with them. There will be no worse publicity than this- not allowing a player compassionate leave when his younger brother was dying.
Selling him will show we want nothing more to do with him. If this claim is untrue, hwo can we, as a club, forgive him?
I am talking more about the clubs hierarchy, rather than us as fans. This really is a shocking claim to make, if untrue.
MeatHunterrr said:Vidal of course. the board arent amateurs that if yaya leaves they wont replace him or replace him with zuculini..KiLP12 said:If he does end up leaving, surely Fernandinho will take Yaya's position and Fernando Fernandinho's position? Garcia will stay and City will be looking for another holding midfielder if Rodwell's not staying. Perhaps Zucullini? Or will he be loaned out too? I don't know just a bit confused now with this Yaya situation.
Lavinda Past said:There are far more witless idiots up here than in the cellar. I'm off downstairs.
dancity19 said:Chrisdunk said:Are you an idiot? Why the fuck would he lie about something like this?dancity19 said:If this isn't true, and I hope, and assume it isn't, then we need to get rid really.
Keeping him would almost seem like admitting it? He can't be so slanderous about us as a club, and paint us in this light, least of all the owners. They want to be seen in the best possible light all over the world, and by all accounts didn't want certain players at the club due to bad publicity they may bring with them. There will be no worse publicity than this- not allowing a player compassionate leave when his younger brother was dying.
Selling him will show we want nothing more to do with him. If this claim is untrue, hwo can we, as a club, forgive him?
I am talking more about the clubs hierarchy, rather than us as fans. This really is a shocking claim to make, if untrue.
No, I'm not an idiot.
Well, in answer to your second question, I'm not quite sure. And, I never said he was lying.
There may be a huge amount of misunderstanding/misquoting here.
We have demonstrated, as a club, in a number of other cases ,that we tend to be 'good' when dealing with situations like this- Zaba and his father for example. Several journalists have already said we have a good record with dealing with unfortunate situations like this.
I see no reason why we would have suddenly changed this and stopped him from taking compassionate leave to see his brother.
IF we did, then this is shocking in the extreme by the club.
I think we need to hear a bit more about the whole scenario, as it is either: shocking from the club if we stopped this, or, shocking from Yaya to make slanderous claims.
So no, I'm not stupid. In fact, I'd put everything I own on being vastly more intelligent than you, in every way possible.
Care to add anything more constructive?
If not, see you in a bit.