Yemen School Bus Attack

Ifwecouldjust....... said:
Does the fact that the chemical weapons used by Assad bore the mark of a british manufacturer and Porton Down make you rethink your argument?

https://nexusnewsfeed.com/article/g...-framed-syria-for-chemical-attacks-yet-again/
Click to expand...

Not really because even if that was true then we still must implicate everyone and not just hold the strange view that western arms are the only force for bad in the world. I never seem to see the same efforts to have a go at foreign arms firms or states, one of those states of course recently killed British citizens on British soil.

The aircraft and bombs the Syrian air force uses to bomb Syrian people are Russian, it is a fact. The aircraft and bombs the Russian air force uses to bomb the Syrian people are also Russian, another fact.

Should the efforts really be concentrated on British involvement or the fact a foreign power in Russia is indiscriminately bombing the place into oblivion at the order of someone who has the objective of oppressing the people of Syria?

You hear the likes of Corbyn condemning British, US, Saudi involvement etc but when did he last criticize Putin or Assad? It is an argument no-one can win.
 
Ifwecouldjust....... said:
your argument around plausible deniability might stand if we didn't have troops out there training the Saudis on using the missile systems etc that we have sold them. (Why we use British troops to train foreign forces how to use weapons sold to them by private companies like BAE and Lockheed Martin is worthy of a thread of its own)
Click to expand...
What argument about plausible deniability?
My post was simply pointing out it does not make any difference to the fortunes of BAE Systems whether there is a civil war in Yemen or not and that suggestions of the husband of the PM profiteering thanks to the war are just nonsense.
 
inbetween said:
BAE does not manufacture missiles so what benefit would it get from any war?

BAE sells weapons platforms yes but those platforms were sold before any war in Syria or Yemen began.

Would BAE selling Typhoons to the RAF (used in Afghanistan, Iraq etc) also amount to a war crime?

Does the Russian support for Assad or Assad himself chemical bombing his own people also amount to war crimes given they have killed thousands and thousands more innocent people in Syria?
Click to expand...

Its a direct conflict of interest.
Profiteered from the killing of children in Syria and the training that is being given to the Saudi's.
Our Prime Minister's husband is profiteering from 2 war's we are involved with that is killing innocent people.


Chemical attack on his own people? I'm sorry but when you add the full truth to that statement, then i will reply to it. I dont agree with Assaad either but thats a half trutj statement
 
Ricster said:
Its a direct conflict of interest.
Profiteered from the killing of children in Syria and the training that is being given to the Saudi's.
Our Prime Minister's husband is profiteering from 2 war's we are involved with that is killing innocent people.


Chemical attack on his own people? I'm sorry but when you add the full truth to that statement, then i will reply to it. I dont agree with Assaad either but thats a half trutj statement
Click to expand...
The full truth is that Assad carried out a chemical attack on his own people. If you don’t believe that then you’re a gullible fool.

Our Prime Minister’s husband has no connection to BAE Systems other than working for a company that owns a subsidiary that has shares in it, and BAE Systems has no connection to the killing of children in Syria. That would be your hero Assad.
 
west didsblue said:
The full truth is that Assad carried out a chemical attack on his own people. If you don’t believe that then you’re a gullible fool.

Our Prime Minister’s husband has no connection to BAE Systems other than working for a company that owns a subsidiary that has shares in it, and BAE Systems has no connection to the killing of children in Syria. That would be your hero Assad.
Click to expand...

I do know that but what was the reason?
Its a half truth.
Assad bombs his own people. Do you think he bombed anyone else.

I dont agree with what happened but i also dont agree with a. The way it was reported and b. The propoganda that both sides used after the attack....especially the Russians.
See Hassan Diab for that.

Im not denying its a crime, my main point is there is more behindit than jusy bombing your own people.

Some on this board would call it collateral damage had it been pro forces
 
https://evolvepolitics.com/theresa-...audi-massacre-of-40-school-children-in-yemen/

And Syria. The best part is the Yanks are at it too. Lockheed Martin supplying the Saudi's and Director Daniel Akerson, was Chief Exec of Carlyle Group who were involved in the Iraq and Afghan wars. Another board member of Carlyle group to profiteer from those wars was.............

The war criminal (Dubya Bush's) father George Bush Snr.

History repeats itself
 
Ricster said:
https://evolvepolitics.com/theresa-...audi-massacre-of-40-school-children-in-yemen/

And Syria. The best part is the Yanks are at it too. Lockheed Martin supplying the Saudi's and Director Daniel Akerson, was Chief Exec of Carlyle Group who were involved in the Iraq and Afghan wars. Another board member of Carlyle group to profiteer from those wars was.............

The war criminal (Dubya Bush's) father George Bush Snr.

History repeats itself
Click to expand...
On this basis, nearly everyone with an occupational pension in the UK is profiteering from the murder of children.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.