Liverpool Banned from signing academy players for 2 years.

Not really sure why any club would give a f### about signing a youth player or having a ban from signing any.

None of them get an opportunity anyway.

Ours costs 200 million and Icheanacho coming on in the 88th minute once a month is all we have to show for it.

Academies are a waste of time in modern football. Coaches and managers are too lazy to improve kids and just buy established players.
 
Inglethorpe came from Spurs and Marshall from Forrest - so no direct link with City as former employees (thank goodness).
It is astonishing that the kid gets punished more than Liverpool.
Par for the course though I guess.
I take it we are out the woods as far as these allegations are concerned? I just need to know for sure before properly laughing at the dippers
 
is the bad just for none english players and can sign just regional based players or is it a whole ban
 
Any signing under the age of 18 from other English clubs.

so they have to bring in there own youth from the younger age groups at liverpool and they are are not aloud to pay a fee for any other young players at other clubs but they can sign young youth players that have been turned down by others and free to sign without a fee or is it a total player ban
 
I feel bad for the lad, greedy clubs and associations don't give a toss about him as evidenced by his limbo. Both Liverpool and Stoke need a good slap tbh.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.