Gaylord du Bois
Well-Known Member
Thats a bit off topic.steviemc said:Squirrels...nature's speed bumps.
Thats a bit off topic.steviemc said:Squirrels...nature's speed bumps.
Mustard Dave said:bobmcfc said:Mustard Dave said:Why would I be? Where is the sense in leaving a lane empty instead of using all the available space and merging in turn when the lane actually closes?
It's called pushing in ! It's not a welcome invitation to infuriate other road users and make their journey longer. Just saying
And that is the problem - it isn't pushing in. It is merely merging later, with the benefit of reducing the length of the tailback by the length of the queue of single file traffic to the actual lane closure. Here is a pretty picture of how others do it:
If you take all the vehicles in the right hand lane and put them behind those on the left, you will see why moving over too early actually has a worse effect.
sinnerman said:Mustard Dave said:bobmcfc said:It's called pushing in ! It's not a welcome invitation to infuriate other road users and make their journey longer. Just saying
And that is the problem - it isn't pushing in. It is merely merging later, with the benefit of reducing the length of the tailback by the length of the queue of single file traffic to the actual lane closure. Here is a pretty picture of how others do it:
If you take all the vehicles in the right hand lane and put them behind those on the left, you will see why moving over too early actually has a worse effect.
But one of the reasons the left hand lane is backed up so far is because it has to keep stopping to let the drivers in the right hand lane in. If they had merged earlier, when room was available, the traffic would flow quicker and the tailback would be far smaller.