On what possible planet do people think that doing what is commonly regarded as a celebratory dance conveys ANY form of protest towards UEFA? It doesn't. It's nothing of the sort.
Do a poznan if we score by all means but please don't think that doing a fucking dance during the CL anthem in any way replaces the only form of protest available, namely to boo and boo again. It's irrelevant if it 'doesn't do any good' and it's irrelevant if Pep doesn't like it. It's nothing to do with him.
Keep booing and never ever stop.
I think you are right. It would be a signal of togetherness and rejection of UEFA at the same time. The cartel including UEFA are out to get City. Show them they aren't gonna win.We did it at Wembley when the scum bastards names were read out and boo'ed them at the same time, and it felt fucking fantastic! A combination of the two seems the way to go here with a culmination of the 'City City City' chant at the end :)
At Wembley it was (and will be tomorrow) a mish mash of things that don't belong together. I remember people beforehand weirdly saying things like "the united players won't know what's hit them." Delusion.We did it at Wembley when the scum bastards names were read out and boo'ed them at the same time, and it felt fucking fantastic! A combination of the two seems the way to go here with a culmination of the 'City City City' chant at the end :)
And it does that how?I think you are right. It would be a signal of togetherness and rejection of UEFA at the same time. The cartel including UEFA are out to get City. Show them they aren't gonna win.
Copying something other teams have done for years then claiming it as our own was poor form. Just like the new paper thank you to Mancini, when it took Mancini to do one first and then it was copied and juts seemed like a fame hunting exercise to me.
Booing UEFA is our thing and we should stick with it.
Well turning your back on somebody is generally a sign of rejection, but I guess if you do not see that there is nothing I can say to convince you.And it does that how?
The Poznan has been done by City fans as a sign of celebration. Not one iota of it has ever been about rejecting anything. Do you know what people will think? "Oh look, City fans are doing a poznan". Message lost. It just makes no sense.Well turning your back on somebody is generally a sign of rejection, but I guess if you do not see that there is nothing I can say to convince you.
At Wembley it was (and will be tomorrow) a mish mash of things that don't belong together. I remember people beforehand weirdly saying things like "the united players won't know what's hit them." Delusion.
I'm not anti-poznan. I'm anti pretending that it in any way replaces booing as a form of protest. It just doesn't. If you don't want to boo then don't boo. This doesn't replace it though.
I don't think you've read what I've said.I don't remember it being a mish mash at all. I remember it being a whole half of Wembley bouncing and booing, and i'd like to think set the tone for the players.
Fair enough if you don't get it, don't join in, but even though it's not exactly ours, everyone remembers us for it and I don't think it would be a bad thing to bring it back. Opinions eh :)