It is annoying as it keeps happening and some are worst than others but like Ric alluded to in another post, all the sendings off have been of our own doing this season and correct decisions. Yes Rojo should have been sent off twice as I have read 500 times but refs being wrong in another game doesn't make our sending off decisions wrong.
Someone suggested in the Everton post match thread that we would have won had we got the pen. There is absolutely no way of knowing that with the defending we do. I couldn't see us throwing 2 points away yesterday from being in total control, but we did. We concede way too many goals and I don't remember too many of them being that contentious. Just terrible defending on the whole.
Whilst we should make more noise about it as a club to get in the refs heads and try and gain some advantage, like Mourinho did to some effect earlier in the season when it wasn't going well for them, we have to do what we can to cut out the sloppy play at both ends of the pitch and make the refs decisions irrelevant. The match day threads often have us getting 6 "nailed on" penalties a game. It's ludicrous.
If people believe the game to be corrupt to the degree it is debated on here then surely you stop going? I have to believe it's just rank incompetence on the whole and if I didn't believe that I would have to give it up.
I also get confused with whether it is an anti city agenda or a pro rag and dipper agenda. If it's the latter, I don't see how giving Arsenal a late pen helps them at all. If anything the sending off and pen for Burnley should be a stronger argument for the latter.