Chris in London said:
i thought about simply calling this thread 'page 3 girls' but then the only people who clicked on the link would have been disappointed.
Murdoch has apparently ended the Sun's tradition of printing pictures of topless models on page three.
Is this a good day for feminism, or a bad day for the freedom of the press?
Just seen some trollop on good morning Britain banging on about this.
The militant feminist looked as though she didn't want to be there, almost intimidated by the girl next to her. She mumbled and stumbled through some terrible points such as:
-It's 2015
-It's objectifying women
-It's sexist
-It's not the 70's any more
-It's sexist
There was also an ex page 3 model on there, who was articulate, and made fair points. She came across as confident and knew what she was talking about. Her points were:
Were not all thick, it's good money and we know what we are doing.
-I've got it so I can flaunt it.
-What's the difference between a topless shot and a bikini shot, apart from a nipple?
-Tits are nice, I like to look at them too!
-You can find tits all over the Internet, why censor this media?
-The sun is hardly the paper to go to for serious news!
I know which side I am on. It's not just about the tits, if there was a page 5 with some rugged looking builder in little undies, I doubt you would get any woman complaining.
If somebody wanted to pay me a grand to get my todge out I would happily accept.it normally only takes 6 pints. I expect it's the same for these girls.
The world is changing. People are now more sexually lliberated than ever, clothes are smaller and more see through than ever, I bit of tit on page 3 is less contraversial now than it has ever been. Why ban it now?