City & FFP | 2020/21 Accounts released | Revenues of £569.8m, £2.4m profit (p 2395)

What the fuck is that that wanker from the Arsenal facebook page going to say now.Forget his name, but he`s the twat who condemns every City signing,our finances, how corrupt our Owner is and how the Gooners are the bees knees into how football clubs should be run.
Some fucker ask him what he thinks of Wengers views now.
 
oakiecokie said:
What the fuck is that that wanker from the Arsenal facebook page going to say now.Forget his name, but he`s the twat who condemns every City signing,our finances, how corrupt our Owner is and how the Gooners are the bees knees into how football clubs should be run.
Some fucker ask him what he thinks of Wengers views now.
Click to expand...
His name is tony attwood-wanker. His latest effort was to say that Etihad was near bankrupt and we would go down with them. Obsession. Scary.
 
SWP's back said:
Reading between the lines he is saying that clubs work ways around it (not fair market value sponsorships etc) so it's pointless. I still think he's having a veiled dig at FFP being toothless.
Click to expand...

Yep. He should be thankful that FFP didn't exist when he was Monaco manager. The sanctimonious twat. Either way, whatever his motives for this comment he thought FFP would entrench Arsenal's position but they've been weakened. Then again, that's probably nothing to do with FFP and everything to do with the fact that they choose not to spend more money on players.
 
wasnt it quoted early in the window that arsenal couldnt increase wages for ozil and sanchez due to ffp? poor wegner. fucked by the rules he so deperately wanted. boo fucking hoo
 
goldcoastblue said:
wasnt it quoted early in the window that arsenal couldnt increase wages for ozil and sanchez due to ffp? poor wegner. fucked by the rules he so deperately wanted. boo fucking hoo
Click to expand...
UEFA's FFP doesn't put any specific limitation on wages as long as a club meets the break-even requirement. However the PL's own version (the Short-Term Cost Control Rules) only allows wages to be increased by a set amount unless any additional increase is fully funded by an increase in commercial/ticket income (but not TV money) or profits on player sales.
 
SWP's back said:
Reading between the lines he is saying that clubs work ways around it (not fair market value sponsorships etc) so it's pointless. I still think he's having a veiled dig at FFP being toothless.
Click to expand...

Who gives a f*** what Wenger thinks. He's increasingly a bumbling idiot.
 
Rolee said:
Is there a detailed breakdown of our commercial revenue available anywhere?
Click to expand...
Well I can start you off with this

For the period ending May 2016.

https://www.theguardian.com/football/2017/jun/01/premier-league-finances-club-by-club

Gate and Matchday £53m

TV and broadcasting, Uefa £61m

TV and broadcasting, all other £100m

Commercial activities £178m

Net debt £11m

Interest payable £1m

The Etihad deal is reportedly worth £40m per annum, and the Nike sponsorship is worth about £20m

Other major sponsors include:

Nissan, SAP, Nexen Tyre, SAP, Aabar, Etisalat, Abu Dhabi Tourism Authority
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top