January transfer/its quiet Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Not just like that , no, but I'd expect us to try, somebody would need to make way in the squad. If we didn't think we could move Mangala, I don't think we'd be trying to bring another centre back in, unless Mendy is left out of the c/l squad.

I thought Mendy was out for the season so would be out of the squad anyways
 
Even Arsenal fans are resigned now to the situation is that he's off,and can only be one destination mate surely,now what number can we give him..........
Just hoping it's not going to drag on until the final day of the window, Hopefully we get it done asap.

Alexis 9 mate!
 
Christensen is better than both and only 21. If we want to poach from rivals we should be aftet him. He is so composed, reads the game brilliantly and is competent on the ball.

His only weakness is perhaps the drilled forward passing Pep likes from his centre halves which is why Umtiti has been mentioned. I thought Umtiti was poor when we beat Barca last season but Pep can improve him and he knows the system to a degree so would fit in well.

He doesn't have a release clause. Why would Chelsea sell?
 
I thought Mendy was out for the season so would be out of the squad anyways
They have always said April, don't know whether he is ahead or behind schedule with his recovery, if he was ahead maybe they would include him for c/l quarter / semi time , if he's still looking at late April , then probably leave him out. Don't know not heard any news on him for a while.

Edit just read in the Martinez thread only 1 of Martinez and Sanchez can be included in the C/L squad so that maybe changes things a bit.
 
He doesn't have a release clause. Why would Chelsea sell?

It was in response to someone talking about going after Spurs' best defender. I just made the point that he was better and younger. I do not think either are realistic targets due to various factors.
 
I don't think so.

We are only now getting players like Gundogan match fit. Yaya has helped keep the players we do have, in condition to play & may do so a lot more if we don't get the signings we want.

If we had the money & the players we want available to sign, he would have gone. No point dumping him just for the sake of it.
Nah! We resigned him early. So it had little to do with not getting who we wanted. We didn't try coz we resigned him.
 
to spend on sanchez or to wait and maybe not get him in the summer must be splitting the vote at city i think
To challenge the top table diners (Barca, Real, Bayern) we have to make these sort of signings. He would undoubtedly improve the squad. He's top quality. And available for a certain cost - there will be a tipping point that Arsenal would accept. We should meet that cost. Or we could see if Jack Rodwell's available.
 
Look at Barca.

About to spend £150m on Coutinho and want him this month.

They are 11 points ahead in the league and know he can’t play Champions League.

Yet we are pondering whether to blow just £25m on what is a world class player who could make a difference for us in the Champions League.
 
Look at Barca.

About to spend £150m on Coutinho and want him this month.

They are 11 points ahead in the league and know he can’t play Champions League.

Yet we are pondering whether to blow just £25m on what is a world class player who could make a difference for us in the Champions League.
We spent more then £200m this summer , Barce lost Neymar and also earn mony this summer so you can understand why we are not hurry to pay for Sanchez..
 
Why would we risk not strengthening to help chance of winning champs league for 20-30 mill
We wouldn't strengthen the squad for just this seasons champions league. We are almost at a stage when the squad is ready to compete for the next few years, except for maybe 3 positions,CB, CM and another front 3 player, so we won't clog it up with players for just to cover the rest of this season.
That said I don't think either of Sanchez or Martinez are short term fixes and if we got them now we would only need 2 players in the summer.
 
It was in response to someone talking about going after Spurs' best defender. I just made the point that he was better and younger. I do not think either are realistic targets due to various factors.

Why don't you think Toby is realistic?
 
'Top quality' and 'World class player'. Easy to state, but his performances at Arsenal do not suggest that he would improve our squad in anything but numbers and reputation. He is 12th in league goal-scoring charts and 42nd in the assists charts. I think you are mistaken if you think it's down to attitude. I watched the Arsenal v Chelsea game last night and he ran himself into the ground, so much so that he scarcely touched the ball in the 2nd half. He had a good 1st half, and a poor 2nd.

He was world class by any definition. But players can slide quickly. And he is. Thankfully we have less than 4 weeks to see what Pep will do. Setting aside the pros and cons, the fact that we do not have an agreement in place with Arsenal suggests to me he is not going anywhere this window. Southampton did not want to sell VVD in the Summer, but Liverpool obviously worked at it over the Summer, and the deal was in place. If we had a serious intention to bring him here, I think a deal would be done, and Arsenal would have had a deal in place. Obviously still plenty of time for things to change, but the fact that this is an old target suggests to me that some people are barking up the wrong tree.
Why would we risk not strengthening to help chance of winning champs league for 20-30 mill
That's a loaded question. Clearly if he would significantly strengthen the squad we would try and do it. The more basic questions are would he significantly strengthen the squad, and will Arsenal sell? Both are matters of opinion. Arsenal had no intention of selling in the Summer, because they did nothing about it until the last day and once again there's no sign of an incoming Arsenal player to replace him. If you see Arsenal agreeing a deal with Mahrez or Lemar etc, then I'd say that they are preparing to sell him.

We're 20 odd points above Arsenal. Logically, at the age of 29, he should be having an absolutely amazing season for us to consider him. He isn't, therefore the enthusiasm to sign him seems misplaced to me. At bayern, Pep signed Alonso. He was an old player, but an old player in his prime whose game, passing, was not going to be affected significantly by age (Gaz Baz). The argument for signing him is restricted to a short term possibility that we may never have an opportunity to win a domestic treble again and Sanchez may help us to do that. An extra pair of legs would help now, but even so I don't think he is enough of a match-winner or an outstanding player that justifies 3 years in our squad at the expense of alternatives in our youth team, and unidentified players in the future. For me players like Maitland-Niles, Ozil, Wilshere are more important for Arsenal. He's not even the best player at Arsenal any more and yet some City fans are convinced he's a vital piece of our jigsaw?
 
They have always said April, don't know whether he is ahead or behind schedule with his recovery, if he was ahead maybe they would include him for c/l quarter / semi time , if he's still looking at late April , then probably leave him out. Don't know not heard any news on him for a while.

Edit just read in the Martinez thread only 1 of Martinez and Sanchez can be included in the C/L squad so that maybe changes things a bit.
Leave Kompany out seems the obvious answer
 
'Top quality' and 'World class player'. Easy to state, but his performances at Arsenal do not suggest that he would improve our squad in anything but numbers and reputation. He is 12th in league goal-scoring charts and 42nd in the assists charts. I think you are mistaken if you think it's down to attitude. I watched the Arsenal v Chelsea game last night and he ran himself into the ground, so much so that he scarcely touched the ball in the 2nd half. He had a good 1st half, and a poor 2nd.

He was world class by any definition. But players can slide quickly. And he is. Thankfully we have less than 4 weeks to see what Pep will do. Setting aside the pros and cons, the fact that we do not have an agreement in place with Arsenal suggests to me he is not going anywhere this window. Southampton did not want to sell VVD in the Summer, but Liverpool obviously worked at it over the Summer, and the deal was in place. If we had a serious intention to bring him here, I think a deal would be done, and Arsenal would have had a deal in place. Obviously still plenty of time for things to change, but the fact that this is an old target suggests to me that some people are barking up the wrong tree.

That's a loaded question. Clearly if he would significantly strengthen the squad we would try and do it. The more basic questions are would he significantly strengthen the squad, and will Arsenal sell? Both are matters of opinion. Arsenal had no intention of selling in the Summer, because they did nothing about it until the last day and once again there's no sign of an incoming Arsenal player to replace him. If you see Arsenal agreeing a deal with Mahrez or Lemar etc, then I'd say that they are preparing to sell him.

We're 20 odd points above Arsenal. Logically, at the age of 29, he should be having an absolutely amazing season for us to consider him. He isn't, therefore the enthusiasm to sign him seems misplaced to me. At bayern, Pep signed Alonso. He was an old player, but an old player in his prime whose game, passing, was not going to be affected significantly by age (Gaz Baz). The argument for signing him is restricted to a short term possibility that we may never have an opportunity to win a domestic treble again and Sanchez may help us to do that. An extra pair of legs would help now, but even so I don't think he is enough of a match-winner or an outstanding player that justifies 3 years in our squad at the expense of alternatives in our youth team, and unidentified players in the future. For me players like Maitland-Niles, Ozil, Wilshere are more important for Arsenal. He's not even the best player at Arsenal any more and yet some City fans are convinced he's a vital piece of our jigsaw?

Fair points Marv but I would suggest you are speculating about us not having anything in place with Arsenal - true?
 
Leave Kompany out seems the obvious answer
From the outside I can see that, but from a squad and player morale side it's much more difficult to do, I think it's a decision that would need to be taken with Vinnie himself .
 
'Top quality' and 'World class player'. Easy to state, but his performances at Arsenal do not suggest that he would improve our squad in anything but numbers and reputation. He is 12th in league goal-scoring charts and 42nd in the assists charts. I think you are mistaken if you think it's down to attitude. I watched the Arsenal v Chelsea game last night and he ran himself into the ground, so much so that he scarcely touched the ball in the 2nd half. He had a good 1st half, and a poor 2nd.

He was world class by any definition. But players can slide quickly. And he is. Thankfully we have less than 4 weeks to see what Pep will do. Setting aside the pros and cons, the fact that we do not have an agreement in place with Arsenal suggests to me he is not going anywhere this window. Southampton did not want to sell VVD in the Summer, but Liverpool obviously worked at it over the Summer, and the deal was in place. If we had a serious intention to bring him here, I think a deal would be done, and Arsenal would have had a deal in place. Obviously still plenty of time for things to change, but the fact that this is an old target suggests to me that some people are barking up the wrong tree.

That's a loaded question. Clearly if he would significantly strengthen the squad we would try and do it. The more basic questions are would he significantly strengthen the squad, and will Arsenal sell? Both are matters of opinion. Arsenal had no intention of selling in the Summer, because they did nothing about it until the last day and once again there's no sign of an incoming Arsenal player to replace him. If you see Arsenal agreeing a deal with Mahrez or Lemar etc, then I'd say that they are preparing to sell him.

We're 20 odd points above Arsenal. Logically, at the age of 29, he should be having an absolutely amazing season for us to consider him. He isn't, therefore the enthusiasm to sign him seems misplaced to me. At bayern, Pep signed Alonso. He was an old player, but an old player in his prime whose game, passing, was not going to be affected significantly by age (Gaz Baz). The argument for signing him is restricted to a short term possibility that we may never have an opportunity to win a domestic treble again and Sanchez may help us to do that. An extra pair of legs would help now, but even so I don't think he is enough of a match-winner or an outstanding player that justifies 3 years in our squad at the expense of alternatives in our youth team, and unidentified players in the future. For me players like Maitland-Niles, Ozil, Wilshere are more important for Arsenal. He's not even the best player at Arsenal any more and yet some City fans are convinced he's a vital piece of our jigsaw?

Probably down to the fact he does not want to be at Arsenal is the shortest answer to your in depth analysis,have you thought that for a sec with regards to the poor form or not improving us scenario ?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top