World Cup VAR

The only way var works well is to borrow cricket rules - each team gets 2-3 attempts which they can use to pull play back for a review of any decision (foul, penalty, card, offside) and they lose one strike if they call it wrong.
 
After years and years of fans abusing the refs for being sh*t and ‘corrupt’ and with more and more cheating diving players on the field. Your team being robbed of perfectly good goals. It amazes me some people want this to remain the same.
 
asaluttar said:
The only way var works well is to borrow cricket rules - each team gets 2-3 attempts which they can use to pull play back for a review of any decision (foul, penalty, card, offside) and they lose one strike if they call it wrong.
Click to expand...
Correct, it’s the best possible solution. I’d say give each team 2 chances per game. Even just one challenge per team would make sense and if they’re successful they get to keep it. 2 or more would probably see too many stoppages.
 
stonerblue said:
Why?
Click to expand...
hqdefault.jpg.cf.jpg


It’s a cultural reference to not liking change.
 
Yes, there is no questioning it, at all.

The 2018 World Cup marks the debut of the video assistant referee (VAR) system, which will be used to review every goal decision. The technology will allow officials to overturn decision if a “clear and obvious” error is made, and Fox commentator Stuart Holden argued that Costa committed a clear foul in the buildup to the goal. Costa clashed with Portugal’s Pepe and appeared to hit Pepe’s face with his forearm, but the goal stood following review.

Did VAR get the call right? Analysts on Twitter disagreed, naturally.



Cristiano Ronaldo had earlier given Portugal the lead from the penalty spot – something that wasn’t reviewed despite Spanish protests – but Rocchi did go to the men in the studio for this one.

Costa appeared to elbow Pepe in the face, with the latter going down onto the floor as a result, before finishing superbly under Rui Patricio.


It looked like a foul in real time however a quick, and admittedly seamless, referral confirmed that it was a goal. It was the first ever referral in the history of the World Cup.



Aguero does that for City, goal stands yes ?
Lukaku does it against City, same interpretation yes ?

Everyone knows this ?

If so, fine, let's bring it in.

If not, what the fuck are you so comfortable about ?
 
Neville Kneville said:
Yes, there is no questioning it, at all.

The 2018 World Cup marks the debut of the video assistant referee (VAR) system, which will be used to review every goal decision. The technology will allow officials to overturn decision if a “clear and obvious” error is made, and Fox commentator Stuart Holden argued that Costa committed a clear foul in the buildup to the goal. Costa clashed with Portugal’s Pepe and appeared to hit Pepe’s face with his forearm, but the goal stood following review.

Did VAR get the call right? Analysts on Twitter disagreed, naturally.



Cristiano Ronaldo had earlier given Portugal the lead from the penalty spot – something that wasn’t reviewed despite Spanish protests – but Rocchi did go to the men in the studio for this one.

Costa appeared to elbow Pepe in the face, with the latter going down onto the floor as a result, before finishing superbly under Rui Patricio.


It looked like a foul in real time however a quick, and admittedly seamless, referral confirmed that it was a goal. It was the first ever referral in the history of the World Cup.



Aguero does that for City, goal stands yes ?
Lukaku does it against City, same interpretation yes ?

Everyone knows this ?

If so, fine, let's bring it in.

If not, what the fuck are you so comfortable about ?
Click to expand...


you're presuming Lukaku would actually manage to score the subsequent chance. I think you should try a more realistic analogy.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top