SWP's back
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 88,250
World Cup VAR
- Thread starter stonerblue
- Start date
stonerblue
Well-Known Member
Funny.
It’s a cultural reference to not liking change.
grim up north
Well-Known Member
Apparently 1 and 4 goal checked within the time it took to get back to kick off and the penalty decision that the red got right no one knew as all correct calls
BlueAnorak
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 31 Oct 2010
- Messages
- 26,173
Going well so far.
blue b4 the moon
Well-Known Member
That's because we (City) aren't playing ;)
Neville Kneville
Well-Known Member
Yes, there is no questioning it, at all.
The 2018 World Cup marks the debut of the video assistant referee (VAR) system, which will be used to review every goal decision. The technology will allow officials to overturn decision if a “clear and obvious” error is made, and Fox commentator Stuart Holden argued that Costa committed a clear foul in the buildup to the goal. Costa clashed with Portugal’s Pepe and appeared to hit Pepe’s face with his forearm, but the goal stood following review.
Did VAR get the call right? Analysts on Twitter disagreed, naturally.
Cristiano Ronaldo had earlier given Portugal the lead from the penalty spot – something that wasn’t reviewed despite Spanish protests – but Rocchi did go to the men in the studio for this one.
Costa appeared to elbow Pepe in the face, with the latter going down onto the floor as a result, before finishing superbly under Rui Patricio.
It looked like a foul in real time however a quick, and admittedly seamless, referral confirmed that it was a goal. It was the first ever referral in the history of the World Cup.
Aguero does that for City, goal stands yes ?
Lukaku does it against City, same interpretation yes ?
Everyone knows this ?
If so, fine, let's bring it in.
If not, what the fuck are you so comfortable about ?
The 2018 World Cup marks the debut of the video assistant referee (VAR) system, which will be used to review every goal decision. The technology will allow officials to overturn decision if a “clear and obvious” error is made, and Fox commentator Stuart Holden argued that Costa committed a clear foul in the buildup to the goal. Costa clashed with Portugal’s Pepe and appeared to hit Pepe’s face with his forearm, but the goal stood following review.
Did VAR get the call right? Analysts on Twitter disagreed, naturally.
Cristiano Ronaldo had earlier given Portugal the lead from the penalty spot – something that wasn’t reviewed despite Spanish protests – but Rocchi did go to the men in the studio for this one.
Costa appeared to elbow Pepe in the face, with the latter going down onto the floor as a result, before finishing superbly under Rui Patricio.
It looked like a foul in real time however a quick, and admittedly seamless, referral confirmed that it was a goal. It was the first ever referral in the history of the World Cup.
Aguero does that for City, goal stands yes ?
Lukaku does it against City, same interpretation yes ?
Everyone knows this ?
If so, fine, let's bring it in.
If not, what the fuck are you so comfortable about ?
PannickAtTheDisco
Well-Known Member
you're presuming Lukaku would actually manage to score the subsequent chance. I think you should try a more realistic analogy.