This is just the same nonsense!!
All sport is subjective! All!
Does that mean when two horses or two athletes cross the line at the same time we should just use our own eyes otherwise we take the fun out of the sport?
No, cos that's plainly stupid!
Introduction of tech has lessened the argument and provided what the right outcome is 99% of the time! The other 1% is subjective and can't be separated and that's fine, we agree to disagree as nothing is 100% accurate all the time.
Football has a little more nuance to it, which is why it shouldn't left to outside opinion, but left to the field of play to challenge certain decisions. That's 'subjective' on the field of play and within the realms of the game as players protest shit all the time.
Once VAR decides to understand this part of the game, it will improve exponentially.
As has been suggested for multiple years now, 2 challenges in a game, run out and the ref has complete autonomy on decisions.
For example, Portugal may have hypothetically protested Pepe getting 'elbowed' before Costa scored and would lost that challenge, so therefore their next 'challenge' would have to be ultra careful(VAR sorted that anyway, mind). Or the [non] trip in the Argentina game would have been 'challenged' and be correctly awarded. As there was no right to appeal Argentina drew a game they could/ should have won, ultimately.
The fact that VAR protesters accepted tech in one sport and not others is weird!
Even MMA are employing tech now, ffs!!