In the hypothetical questions I am saying it. That is in response to the question being asked "how would we feel if he ran his contract down" I also put in at least one possibly more that I am not saying that is what he is doing.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Sterling’s contract - three year extension confirmed
- Thread starter Essex blue
- Start date
In the hypothetical questions I am saying it. That is in response to the question being asked "how would we feel if he ran his contract down" I also put in at least one possibly more that I am not saying that is what he is doing.
Of course players can run down contracts, you called them professional though for doing so which to me isn't. Whoever that person is, be it a City player or someone completely irrelevant where there are no emotions involved. For me it's loyalty, Sterling has been treated very well by City. I don't follow any romantic notion that he should have an allegiance to us for life there is a difference between just wanting to leave and running a contract down. Morally for me it is wrong for anyone to do that, like I said it wouldn't harm him in the slightest to sign a new deal (whilst getting paid more) keep playing as well as he is and then letting someone buy him. What he wants to do is leave the club, bagging a huge signing on fee and leaving us without a penny for him and having to spend a fortune to replace him. All of course if he does run down his contract by the way.
If you can accept that behaviour from someone, shafting the club you love and support then fair enough.
That's exactly what you said.
May I ask why you deleted and chose to ignore the bit I have put in bold above?
citizen_maine
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 May 2011
- Messages
- 18,317
I think we're going to see more and more players run down their contracts over the next decade, possibly to a point where transfer fees become the exception rather than the norm for elite players. $anch£z has shown how much money can be made by doing so, and clubs are already showing willing to wait for players to let their contracts run down. Ironically, this may also see a return to 'one club' players, as once you've got a superstar you'll pay whatever is necessary to keep him (Barca with Messi?)
I think/hope Sterling will stay, as I expect agreement to be reached. But I can understand why he might think it is worthwhile running down his contract if we're not prepared to offer close to what he thinks his worth is.
I think/hope Sterling will stay, as I expect agreement to be reached. But I can understand why he might think it is worthwhile running down his contract if we're not prepared to offer close to what he thinks his worth is.
mosssideblue
Well-Known Member
I have offered opinion, but if you dont like it, use the ignore buttonMossside It's interesting that you appear to have an opinion on everyone else's opinion but can't offer any opinion yourself and contribute to the debate? That's all this is, just a forum for blues to offer opinions is it not? Yet whenever you enter a debate you always seem to have a bit of an issue with people giving their opinion on something that is cleary very important to them and us all?
mosssideblue
Well-Known Member
The way our business is run these days, I would say no player is in a position to hold the club to ransom. He (as will others) will be offered what the club deem to be a fair amount and then he has to piss or get off the pot as I dont see the board being bullied by Sterling and his agent.In today's market what is Sterling worth salary wise! £200k, £250k or £300k a week?
If he leaves, what would it cost to replace him?
Sterling is in prime position to hold City to ransom, but on the other side of things, if he doesn't sign a deal before say end Jan, with our squad we can afford to bench him. Or if a big foreign club comes in with a £100M+ offer we accept and move on
It does seem fucking insane to me that a player doesn't believe £10M a year in wages plus whatever sponsorship for boots etc isn't enough
I understand that these are the elite in a highly paid profession and they're only at their peak earning potential for eight years or so, but fucking hell!
mosssideblue
Well-Known Member
I tend to agree with this and it would show that players are clearly looking out for themselves, as they shouldI think we're going to see more and more players run down their contracts over the next decade, possibly to a point where transfer fees become the exception rather than the norm for elite players. $anch£z has shown how much money can be made by doing so, and clubs are already showing willing to wait for players to let their contracts run down. Ironically, this may also see a return to 'one club' players, as once you've got a superstar you'll pay whatever is necessary to keep him (Barca with Messi?)
I think/hope Sterling will stay, as I expect agreement to be reached. But I can understand why he might think it is worthwhile running down his contract if we're not prepared to offer close to what he thinks his worth is.
kaz7
Well-Known Member
You said what he wants to do etc,how am i supposed to read that?No, I think what has happened here is what you are accusing me of. You are assuming the worst in me, I am not for one second saying he is running his contract down. ANOTHER poster asked the question how would we feel if he ran his contract down and left. Many people gave their opinions on it with quite a few agreeing with me. We have had irrelevant players in the past run their contracts down, not first team regulars who if they want to leave would command a very good sum of money for the club. Try reading what I put if you want to chip in.
Zabba,yaya,dave,sergio and vinny are all running contracts down,they are/were first teamers
Last edited:
Centurions
Well-Known Member
I deleted lots of both posts as they weren't necessary, why are you ignoring the fact that you stated exactly what Karen said you did while now trying to muddy the waters? If you made a mistake in your original wording just say so but nobody can possibly read your original post any other way then that you thought he was running his contract down.May I ask why you deleted and chose to ignore the bit I have put in bold above?
You said what he wants to do etc,how am i supposed to read that?
Zabba,yaya,dave,sergio and vinny are all running contracts down,they are/were first teamers
I clearly in several posts pointed out I don't think he is doing that, it is my stance IF he was. Pretty easy. You are digging a deeper hole here, if you are comparing a 23 year old who is probably worth 80 million plus to ageing players coming to the end of their careers then it is pointless even discussing.
I deleted lots of both posts as they weren't necessary, why are you ignoring the fact that you stated exactly what Karen said you did while now trying to muddy the waters? If you made a mistake in your original wording just say so but nobody can possibly read your original post any other way then that you thought he was running his contract down.
How can't you read it any other way when at the end of the post you quoted I put "if he is trying to run his contract down of course" My post was with the scenario someone else said so I was replying as if he was running it down. I don't think he is and I hope he isn't, my post was my thoughts if he was. Now piss off Karen it is weird you have two log ins.
kaz7
Well-Known Member
You didn't say IF you said what he wants to do,never mind,i also said to you it won't happen with a 23yr old as he is too valueable and it will get sorted one way or another soon,we could sell dave,vinny and sergio tomorrow if we wanted to as they are still brilliant players with at least a couple of years left at the top but we don't as thats not the way we want to treat our great playersI clearly in several posts pointed out I don't think he is doing that, it is my stance IF he was. Pretty easy. You are digging a deeper hole here, if you are comparing a 23 year old who is probably worth 80 million plus to ageing players coming to the end of their careers then it is pointless even discussing.
You didn't say IF you said what he wants to do,never mind,i also said to you it won't happen with a 23yr old as he is too valueable and it will get sorted one way or another soon,we could sell dave,vinny and sergio tomorrow if we wanted to as they are still brilliant players with at least a couple of years left at the top but we don't as thats not the way we want to treat our great players
They also aren't holding out for every last penny. Yes that was in my post, AGAIN under the scenario of the poster saying how would we feel. Read the threads and the conversations and you will see how it went. Not repeating myself again.
sir baconface
Well-Known Member
This is basic human relations theory. Unless really poor, people compare relative wages, not absolute. And no matter how rich they become, they have a sense of injustice if someone perceived to be worse than them earns more.I don't believe it's a case of them not believing it's enough, more about if he's getting X then I want Y, more an ego thing than anything else.
Why? Because in our society, income is a value judgement, a statement of comparative worth.
SebastianBlue
President, International Julian Alvarez Fan Club
- Joined
- 25 Jul 2009
- Messages
- 57,736
I see the Google AI team has implemented a few improvements to the ‘adaptive recursive social engagement’ bots over the last few weeks. Their productivity has shot up substantially across multiple threads.
@Henkeman Have you been tracking their activity?
@karen7 If you were to rate their efficiency on a scale of 1 to 10, where would you put them?
I am completing a survey for Ric to see if this beta phase is worth an investment in to a full roll out. ;-)
@Henkeman Have you been tracking their activity?
@karen7 If you were to rate their efficiency on a scale of 1 to 10, where would you put them?
I am completing a survey for Ric to see if this beta phase is worth an investment in to a full roll out. ;-)
I see the Google AI team has implemented a few improvements to the ‘adaptive recursive social engagement’ bots over the last few weeks. Their productivity has shot up substantially across multiple threads.
@Henkeman Have you been tracking their activity?
@karen7 If you were to rate their efficiency on a scale of 1 to 10, where would you put them?
I am completing a survey for Ric to see if this beta phase is worth an investment in to a full roll out. ;-)
Mate, I would do. But I'd have as much success and in depth knowledge tracking stealth fighters! ;-)
SebastianBlue
President, International Julian Alvarez Fan Club
- Joined
- 25 Jul 2009
- Messages
- 57,736
You’re right, they do seem to be using a complex system of VPN tunnelling and old-fashioned gaslighting, which makes them difficult to track!Mate, I would do. But I'd have as much success and in depth knowledge tracking stealth fighters! ;-)
You’re right, they do seem to be using a complex system of VPN tunnelling and old-fashioned gaslighting, which makes them difficult to track!
I'm going off you rapidly...
SebastianBlue
President, International Julian Alvarez Fan Club
- Joined
- 25 Jul 2009
- Messages
- 57,736
What are the chances I would hear that twice in one day?I'm going off you rapidly...
Though, the missus put it a bit more delicately.
Sterling will probably be rubbing his hands at the announcement of Luke Shaw's new contract.
"If he's valued at £190k a week..."
Sometimes it's worth just taking a moment to realise United have handed Luke Shaw a £52m contract for....nothing? For starting half a dozen games?