Spurs’ new stadium

I might agree with you. However, I do not agree it would have been reasonable for me, Levy or anyone else to know that beforehand.
I might not have known, but I would have been wary and highly cautious around the likelihood of the eventual outcome. One only needs look at the narrative surrounding the stadium where the game was eventually played to appreciate the prudence of such an approach. You state Levy’s contingency was workable; possibly so, but it wasn’t sufficiently adequate, otherwise City fans wouldn’t have been so inconvenienced and out of pocket; or are you suggesting that in spite of that inconvenience, the contingency was adequate?
 
wrong spurs knowing full well wembley was unavailable that weekend should of requested an away fixture that week end.
which is their right before the fixtures are compiled

Have I missed something? Surely it was available and the fixture went ahead? Spurs 0 City 1?
 
I might not have known, but I would have been wary and highly cautious around the likelihood of the eventual outcome. One only needs look at the narrative surrounding the stadium where the game was eventually played to appreciate the prudence of such an approach. You state Levy’s contingency was workable; possibly so, but it wasn’t sufficiently adequate, otherwise City fans wouldn’t have been so inconvenienced and out of pocket; or are you suggesting that in spite of that inconvenience, the contingency was adequate?

What makes you think that Spurs were that bothered about that? The contingency from their perspective was fine, they didn't have to pay out for the inconvenience, and had a couple of days of mildly negative headlines. Seems to me their contingency planning was excellent - it's just that City fans got screwed over. And why would they be too fussed about that?
 
I might not have known, but I would have been wary and highly cautious around the likelihood of the eventual outcome. One only needs look at the narrative surrounding the stadium where the game was eventually played to appreciate the prudence of such an approach. You state Levy’s contingency was workable; possibly so, but it wasn’t sufficiently adequate, otherwise City fans wouldn’t have been so inconvenienced and out of pocket; or are you suggesting that in spite of that inconvenience, the contingency was adequate?

The contingency plan was reasonable and achievable which makes it adequate.

And yes, I also acknowledge that many people were inconvenienced by it and that was regrettable. However, I stand by my view that Spurs' response was adequate and the best option available.
 
The contingency plan was reasonable and achievable which makes it adequate.

And yes, I also acknowledge that many people were inconvenienced by it and that was regrettable. However, I stand by my view that Spurs' response was adequate and the best option available.
So you’re saying (and correct me if I’m wrong) that in spite of the regrettable inconvenience to City fans, the contingency plan was adequate?
 
So you’re saying (and correct me if I’m wrong) that in spite of the regrettable inconvenience to City fans, the contingency plan was adequate?

Not just City fans. All fans.

And yes. Adequate. And the best option available. It would have been more inconvenient to all fans to move to another weekend or another stadium.
 
Not just City fans. All fans.

And yes. Adequate. And the best option available. It would have been more inconvenient to all fans to move to another weekend or another stadium.
It would have been much less inconvenient to plan sufficiently so that the game wouldn’t need to be moved from its original time and place at such short notice. I readily concede, that would have been an adequate contingency.
 
It would have been much less inconvenient to plan sufficiently so that the game wouldn’t need to be moved from its original time and place at such short notice. I readily concede, that would have been an adequate contingency.

I think you're coming from a false premise - that contingency planning for Spurs involves worrying about inconvenience for City (and other) fans. It doesn't, they couldn't care less about it.
 
Yes, many Spurs fans are pissed off. Understandably so. And yes, some other clubs and their fans are also pissed off - equally understandably. But it seems to me that, as is sadly the media / social media driven norm in our country these days, hyperbole, melodrama and misinformation are running rampant. A bit of perspective wouldn't go amiss.

Judging by some of the comments both here and elsewhere, you could have been forgiven for thinking that Spurs - and Levy in particular - had committed unspeakable crimes against humanity while presiding over the biggest bungle in the entire history of bungling (did I mention hyperbole?)! ;-)

The truth is somewhat less dramatic. A major construction project has overrun by a few months because a critical wiring error by a subcontractor was discovered at the eleventh hour. As a consequence of which, 50 thousand or so Spurs fans and a few thousand Manchester City fans had their prepaid travel plans disrupted and have been left variously out of pocket. In addition, Manchester City FC suffered the inconvenience of having to make a couple of alterations to their schedule and having to play a game of football on a poor surface. Thankfully for Man City, no one was injured and they won the game anyway.

That's the sum of it. And while I absolutely do understand the annoyance felt by many now, I'm also quite certain that it will all soon be forgotten once the stadium is finally opened. It may be too much to think that rival fans will ever admit that the wait was worth it but I hope that Spurs fans will, at least.

Can all of those out of pocket send you or Daniel a bill? Not just about that, how about those MCFC games that are affected by the Premier League approved change, Southampton and Fulham. The only reason THFC are expanding their stadium is to make more MONEY. How about some of that money goes to genuine fans who travel the length and breadth of the country to follow THEIR team.
 
Have I missed something? Surely it was available and the fixture went ahead? Spurs 0 City 1?
assume your taking the piss ?
it was played on a work day monday completly shafting city fans the fulham fan and southampton fans as a knock on effect.
you really are a special breed you spurs lot almost dipperesk .in never your fault ?
 
The wiring was a monumental fuck up, everything was meant to be going well and on schedule. Either way that will all be forgotten about once the stadium is ready. Im surprised everyone is arguing about it. Its going to be a beautiful stadium and close to the pitch!
 
The wiring was a monumental fuck up, everything was meant to be going well and on schedule. Either way that will all be forgotten about once the stadium is ready. Im surprised everyone is arguing about it. Its going to be a beautiful stadium and close to the pitch!

Hope the standard of football is up to it. I watch Spurs quite a bit, when City aren't on and your level has definately dropped, from
2 seasons ago.
 
We look a bit sluggish and in second gear to be honest mate. Considering we are only a point behind Chelsea i will take that right now!

Not having a go or anything. Just giving my opinion. Used to like watching Spurs. They're still one of the better sides.
Think Alli not keeping up his standards and injuries have hit you. Alderwiereld not the player he was pre injury.
Now your best defender (imo) , Vertonghen out. Davies isn't a patch on what Rose was before his injury and Eriksen
has just seemed to have dipped a bit. A lot of parts in your side.
 
How impressive a stadium looks is fairly inconsequential really. It's a nice to have but not a game changer. What really matters to a club is how big the capacity is, can you fill it often enough and how much you can charge for tickets.The Swamp is a hotch potch of design but what really matters is that it is the biggest club stadium.

Spurs have hugely over-specified and over spent on their new ground and it looks like it will be a financial drain for decades to come.

When the North Stand extension is complete we will have a bigger capacity than every club except the Rags at a fraction of the cost of the Spurs stadium.

In what respect?
 
In what respect?

In respect of the fact it has cost hundreds of millions more than budgeted for. It looks great but I'd imagine a 60,000 seat stadium with suitability for NFL games could have been delivered far more cheaply, even in North London.

Once the initial buzz of being in a much nicer environment has worn off, Spurs fans will be far more interested in the quality of football on offer and if your team can actually start to seriously challenge for trophies.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top