Luckily you’re not in chargeWe should have got Weigl on loan until the end of the season with an option to buy.
Luckily you’re not in chargeWe should have got Weigl on loan until the end of the season with an option to buy.
He wouldn’t be a starter.
Foden would step up into Gundogan’s role and Brooks would slot into Foden’s current role. A conveyor belt if you will.
Both Foden and Brooks are going to be some players.
Gundogan wouldn’t be missed.
Why would we spend £50m for someone to take Foden's role, and why on earth would Brooks move here to take a role which has so far seen Foden start 0 league games?
This is one of the most bizarre propositions I've ever seen on BM.
Why would we spend £50m for someone to take Foden's role, and why on earth would Brooks move here to take a role which has so far seen Foden start 0 league games?
This is one of the most bizarre propositions I've ever seen on BM.
Where you getting 50m from? We managed to pick up Jesus, Bernardo and Sane for nowhere near that kind of money.
Brooks would move here as we’re the much bigger club with much more chance of winning trophies and the best coach on the planet, who improves players, working for us.
The only bizarre thing is your response mate.
He wouldn’t be a starter.
Foden would step up into Gundogan’s role and Brooks would slot into Foden’s current role. A conveyor belt if you will.
Both Foden and Brooks are going to be some players.
Gundogan wouldn’t be missed.
Why would Bournemouth sell their best player for less than an absurd amount? It's not 2008 anymore, no premier league club needs to sell a key player for less than 50m.
Well if that’s the going rate it’s all relative so 50m is fuck all to worry your little head about.
What are your views on who we should be looking at?
Dong forget fella scoring against burton and Rotherham is ok but it’s not top tier teams . I’ll be honest with you I don’t think he is good enough to be our main striker. When Jesus came it was thought that by this time he should the clear first choice striker but in truth who would you rather play if it was a one game to win the title. I know kun gets the nod all the time. I wouldn’t sell Jesus as he is good back upWow, especially after the month he had, not sure whether to take you seriously.
The lad is 21, contracted until he's 26. He's got 15 goals in 30 appearances across all competitions with a goal every 108 minutes.
"Is Jesus as good as Messi?" Fuck sake, if that's the bar we're setting we better sell the whole squad.
Mbappe is a fantastic player but he is without a doubt playing against worse competition than Gabby. You're looking at 100m+ for Griezmann, 200m+ for Mbappe, and Messi isn't leaving Barca. We've shown in the last few transfer windows we don't want to meet the selling teams' demands, haggling the price down and in many cases, ultimately losing out on the player. You want us to try that with the most expensive players in the most expensive position?
I would be absolutely furious if we sold Gabby this summer.
Why would we spend money to replace someone who hasn't started a league game?
Are you always this thick?