Media coverage 2018/19

Status
Not open for further replies.
Well, I could, but I would like to read city news in the company of Blues. I live in Scotland so there aren't many blues about. So most of my chat with fellow blues is on this site. But all the media discussion is donated by this agenda. And. It's. So. Fucking. BORING.

But it's clearly a big thing for some blues - fine, each to their own. I'm just asking for an agenda-free zone on here, too.

Yeah I can understand your point , I'm lucky live in Manchester so I can talk to many blues at the match, with family/friends at work, the pub etc and many of our discussions are agenda free , it can be well over the top on here the agenda but just smile . None of it's nothing to worry about
 
The Media agenda is real, Prove me wrong.

It's inherently true because us being successful isn't going to attract clicks from the frothing red ****s that inhabit the nation and abroad. Us being banned and being called ****s and being blamed for the ruining of football, however, will.
 
It isnt bordering on anything. The man is an out and out cheat. More of a cheat than Clattenburg and thats saying something.
Similar turd Dermot Gallagher said Bernardo’s penalty against Hammers wasn’t much contact yet previously said Salah’s against Newcastle was blatant.
 
Well, I could, but I would like to read city news in the company of Blues. I live in Scotland so there aren't many blues about. So most of my chat with fellow blues is on this site. But all the media discussion is donated by this agenda. And. It's. So. Fucking. BORING.

But it's clearly a big thing for some blues - fine, each to their own. I'm just asking for an agenda-free zone on here, too.

That thread you want will also end up like this thread, unless you want to MOD it? Ask Ric.

As other 's have stated, there is News Now, etc. Don't' bother with the mainstream media, they aren't interested in us

One more thing. If Liverpool win Today, have a look at how that will be reported across the media
 
That thread you want will also end up like this thread, unless you want to MOD it? Ask Ric.
You're probably right about this.

I suppose what bothers me is that we are *literally* the luckiest club in the world. Ten years ago we won the jackpot. And now we moan about referees /media /UEFA...
 
That thread you want will also end up like this thread, unless you want to MOD it? Ask Ric.

As other 's have stated, there is News Now, etc. Don't' bother with the mainstream media, they aren't interested in us

One more thing. If Liverpool win Today, have a look at how that will be reported across the media

I read the daily mail most days , cos my dad buys it he's retired now so enjoys reading a paper and doing the quizzes , the mirror and the sun not for him , the mail is ok for city reporting Martin Samuel is great and most the the city match reports are good but mail online is poor tho
 
Well, I could, but I would like to read city news in the company of Blues. I live in Scotland so there aren't many blues about. So most of my chat with fellow blues is on this site. But all the media discussion is donated by this agenda. And. It's. So. Fucking. BORING.

But it's clearly a big thing for some blues - fine, each to their own. I'm just asking for an agenda-free zone on here, too.

As you don't live in Manchester you wont have the benefit of a radio station that used to be called Key 103 and is now Hits radio or something equally stupid. There 10am news had a sports bit at the end. we had minutes given over to the rags brilliant win, how Lukaku was brilliant. then the paper boy telling us how Lukaku was brilliant in training and always smiling and was ...ergh brilliant, they then said and 'Manchester City went back to the top with a 1-0 win. ' That was it, so may be some do moan but I think they have good reason to. We are playing brilliant (see what I did there) football, we are in 4 competitions are currently top of the league and we are from Manchester but we get a token mention on a Manchester radio station.
 
Well, I could, but I would like to read city news in the company of Blues. I live in Scotland so there aren't many blues about. So most of my chat with fellow blues is on this site. But all the media discussion is donated by this agenda. And. It's. So. Fucking. BORING.

But it's clearly a big thing for some blues - fine, each to their own. I'm just asking for an agenda-free zone on here, too.

It’s a big thing for some blues because for 35 years we had to suffer the ignomy of having our noses rubbed in the dirt because everything revolves around that wankstain of a club at mould Trafford. Any little scrap of success was overlooked for some spurious article on them. I even remember our local paper the MEN doing a piece on the wages paid to the busby babes and it wasn’t even in the sports section - how was that newsworthy 40 years on.

Anyway, the point is, now that we are successful - and overshadowing the rag vermin, we STILL don’t get any recognition for it.

You may find it boring - some of us find it a tad irritating.
 
After the Schalke game BTs "expert referee" analyst (their words not mine) Peter Walton claimed the Fernandinho penalty was the correct call despite 2 Schalke players being offside , stating that they couldnt be offside since they didnt play the ball ? seemed a bit strange to me since you regularly see the offside flag go up before the ball is played.
Today in the Spurs v Arsenal game , Harry Kane won a penalty despite being offside , Peter Walton BTs "expert analyist" argued that the ref had got it wrong this time and it shouldnt have been a penalty because Kane was offside...Clearly Walton still harbours anti City bias , even now hes a pundit , his record when reffing City games was shady bordering on corrupt ..
Actually Walton is correct that Fernandinho's slip and drag down of a Schalke player is a penalty. Offside doesn't count till an opposition player touches the ball
He spoke total bollox about the Otamendi hand ball though.
 
Tiresome boring and predictable.
And rehashing a story from November. Sadly for them "His Highness" without a Sheikh's name refers to the Emir and not Sheikh Mansour. Simon Pearce would never make such a protocol mistake in a billion years.
 
As you don't live in Manchester you wont have the benefit of a radio station that used to be called Key 103 and is now Hits radio or something equally stupid. There 10am news had a sports bit at the end. we had minutes given over to the rags brilliant win, how Lukaku was brilliant. then the paper boy telling us how Lukaku was brilliant in training and always smiling and was ...ergh brilliant, they then said and 'Manchester City went back to the top with a 1-0 win. ' That was it, so may be some do moan but I think they have good reason to. We are playing brilliant (see what I did there) football, we are in 4 competitions are currently top of the league and we are from Manchester but we get a token mention on a Manchester radio station.
That's pretty sickening.
 
And rehashing a story from November. Sadly for them "His Highness" without a Sheikh's name refers to the Emir and not Sheikh Mansour. Simon Pearce would never make such a protocol mistake in a billion years.

According to PB the emails this time do contain reference to ADUG sourcing sponsorships, which is not good news for us.......assuming of course that UEFA are prepared to gamble all on their hacked information
 
According to PB the emails this time do contain reference to ADUG sourcing sponsorships, which is not good news for us.......assuming of course that UEFA are prepared to gamble all on their hacked information
I believe that refers to the two companies that Sheikh Mansour is a related party too. Something that UEFA already know about.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top