There you go.
A nice link to the Daily Mirror article about how we hindered the development Denis Suarez
https://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/man-city-clause-hindered-denis-14060482
I won't comment, I'll let you read it & give us your description of what you think the purpose of this is.
I didn't watch it.
I watched the 1st half of the wimmins game, recorded motd, fast forward past the rag shite to watch City highlights, then watched the 2nd half.
That's because unlike all these rag & scouse supporting media people, who are completely neutral when it comes to City, & never intentionally shit on us, I have an agenda against Utd.
I really can't stand the ****s. (or Liverpool).
You. Fucking. What. ?Correct, it was a great game, well worthy of top billing.
Mods: a favour. Can we have a media thread which just reports what the media is saying and writing about us, and another which is about the "agenda"?
I would just really love to be able to read about our media coverage without being exposed to people's self pitying tropes about the international conspiracy against city and how no one appreciates us.
Good man, Nev. I wouldn't watch it. Mrs Ewing asked this morning if I wanted MotD on. I'm not watching the Rags. It might be you. I can watch on 'ere, pointing to my phone!
You. Fucking. What. ?
Ahh, but if you worked for, let's say. The Sun newspaper, & I worked for, let's say the Mirror, we would both be professional enough to be completely neutral whenever we covered Manchester Utd & not try to shit all over them from a great height, at all & appeal to our fellow City types, when we got the chance.
Because we would be part of Her Majesty's press, & that would be completely beneath us, as we would be duty bound, on the sports pages, to live up to the high standards of honest, unbiased, neutral, non agenda, reporting, we see on the front pages & in the middle.
Mods: a favour. Can we have a media thread which just reports what the media is saying and writing about us, and another which is about the "agenda"?
I would just really love to be able to read about our media coverage without being exposed to people's self pitying tropes about the international conspiracy against city and how no one appreciates us.
Which is why the impartial ,independent, bbc choose utd fa cup ties as their live match,every single time,and have done for the last decade.It was 3-2 a 5 goal thriller and some cracking goals, this is the problem with "the agenda" some people look for anything to claim an agenda where there isn't one
Good grief, discussion on a discussion forum, whatever next?You could always fuck off and read news now
Mods: a favour. Can we have a media thread which just reports what the media is saying and writing about us, and another which is about the "agenda"?
I would just really love to be able to read about our media coverage without being exposed to people's self pitying tropes about the international conspiracy against city and how no one appreciates us.
It isnt bordering on anything. The man is an out and out cheat. More of a cheat than Clattenburg and thats saying something.After the Schalke game BTs "expert referee" analyst (their words not mine) Peter Walton claimed the Fernandinho penalty was the correct call despite 2 Schalke players being offside , stating that they couldnt be offside since they didnt play the ball ? seemed a bit strange to me since you regularly see the offside flag go up before the ball is played.
Today in the Spurs v Arsenal game , Harry Kane won a penalty despite being offside , Peter Walton BTs "expert analyist" argued that the ref had got it wrong this time and it shouldnt have been a penalty because Kane was offside...Clearly Walton still harbours anti City bias , even now hes a pundit , his record when reffing City games was shady bordering on corrupt ..
Here you go. Our local paper, the MUEN.
City go back top, 2 points clear of Liverpool, 11 points clear of United, another clean sheet, the opposition no shots on goal, etc, etc, but MUEN Sport leads with a small United headline and article, followed closely by a large United headline and story, followed by a small United headline and story....., keep on scrolling, carry on scrolling....., and you will eventually get to 2 small City headlines and article's.
https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk
You can’t escape it on this site. Somewhere in every thread it pops up.Mods: a favour. Can we have a media thread which just reports what the media is saying and writing about us, and another which is about the "agenda"?
I would just really love to be able to read about our media coverage without being exposed to people's self pitying tropes about the international conspiracy against city and how no one appreciates us.
After the Schalke game BTs "expert referee" analyst (their words not mine) Peter Walton claimed the Fernandinho penalty was the correct call despite 2 Schalke players being offside , stating that they couldnt be offside since they didnt play the ball ? seemed a bit strange to me since you regularly see the offside flag go up before the ball is played.
Today in the Spurs v Arsenal game , Harry Kane won a penalty despite being offside , Peter Walton BTs "expert analyist" argued that the ref had got it wrong this time and it shouldnt have been a penalty because Kane was offside...Clearly Walton still harbours anti City bias , even now hes a pundit , his record when reffing City games was shady bordering on corrupt ..
Well, I could, but I would like to read city news in the company of Blues. I live in Scotland so there aren't many blues about. So most of my chat with fellow blues is on this site. But all the media discussion is donated by this agenda. And. It's. So. Fucking. BORING.You could always fuck off and read news now
So you want to pick and choose what bits of the media to discuss? Seems legit.Mods: a favour. Can we have a media thread which just reports what the media is saying and writing about us, and another which is about the "agenda"?
I would just really love to be able to read about our media coverage without being exposed to people's self pitying tropes about the international conspiracy against city and how no one appreciates us.
I’m just fucking stunned a Trump hasn’t been mentioned yet.Well, I could, but I would like to read city news in the company of Blues. I live in Scotland so there aren't many blues about. So most of my chat with fellow blues is on this site. But all the media discussion is donated by this agenda. And. It's. So. Fucking. BORING.
But it's clearly a big thing for some blues - fine, each to their own. I'm just asking for an agenda-free zone on here, too.
Mainly people moaning about people expressing their opinion.You can’t escape it on this site. Somewhere in every thread it pops up.
That’s the BM tag line.......Mainly people moaning about people expressing their opinion.