Madeleine McCann

Personally I think they’re guilty as fuck. At the very least the child neglect is disgraceful. Cunts. The pair of them come across as fucking sinister

Why are the Met paying for this shit too? Surely if any force is paying it should be Leicestershire it whatever tin pot constabulary they come under

She’s dead ffs. On Kate and Gerry’s watch. Awful human beings
Can never get my head around this, 100% guilty of child neglect yet fuck all happens, how come??, is it because the crime wasn’t in Britain??
 
What possible motive would the parents have for killing their daughter? I just can’t see it. I think both parents are/were medical Doctors a truly caring profession. I haven’t seen the documentary mentioned. One thing is certain the initial Police investigation was poorly managed/ handled.
 
What possible motive would the parents have for killing their daughter? I just can’t see it. I think both parents are/were medical Doctors a truly caring profession. I haven’t seen the documentary mentioned. One thing is certain the initial Police investigation was poorly managed/ handled.
One thing that is certain is that they're guilty of neglect and are not fit to be parents
 
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_to_silence_in_England_and_Wales

We do have a right to remain silent, but, hiding salient information from investigators is frowned upon, and can be used to infer guilt (circumstancially).
So, who decides what is “salient” information and self-incrimination? Usually, the people trying to hang you!!!

The video is absolutely correct...there is NOTHING to be gained by speaking to Police! Even the Cop agrees!!!

The Police are trying (very quickly, in often pressurized circumstances) to piece together a picture and timeline. It is very, very easy to give them information that often helps them insert YOU into that movie in their head.

No...”I would like to cooperate fully with your investigation, but need to speak to MY ATTORNEY before speaking to police.” THEN, STFU!!!
 
One thing that is certain is that they're guilty of neglect and are not fit to be parents
Probably more complacency than neglect. Wealthy people going out enjoying themselves in a country perceived to be very safe and family oriented. They had probably done this previously and it could have become a habit.
 
Probably more complacency than neglect. Wealthy people going out enjoying themselves in a country perceived to be very safe and family oriented. They had probably done this previously and it could have become a habit.
And, they had a system of frequently “checking in,” which, had nothing happened, would have been considered reasonable by many, although not all. It is not something I would do, but I can see it happening.
 
Probably more complacency than neglect. Wealthy people going out enjoying themselves in a country perceived to be very safe and family oriented. They had probably done this previously and it could have become a habit.
I think the common assumption is that it was an accident, if it did happen at all. The twins who were also in the room at the time, apparently did not move or make any noise even when the room was full of a load of people tryna work out wtf had happened, i mean some kids are like that but you would have expected there to have been a lot of noise. They are specifically asked in one of the interviews if they administered any drugs to the kids to help them to sleep and they kind of dodge around the question. When you're on holiday, or on a flight, giving your kids a spoon of Calpol probably isn't something completely different to what other parents do to help them sleep.
 
The dogs sent in confirmed what happened imho dont think there was a kidnapping

They didn't though. Again, other facts haven't been reported. There was extensive research into the results from the dogs used to test theor success rate and I believe it was in the 60-70% range depending on dog (three were used I think). So again, not conclusive evidence at all. And the DNA found in the rental car wasn't conclusive either. It had Madeleine's DNA but not all strands that proved it could only have been from her.

However, very good lawyers will make sure that those high but non-conclusive results don't add up to a conviction. Some DAs in America, under political pressure to get a conviction, would have enough from them to nail a suspect though!
 
And, they had a system of frequently “checking in,” which, had nothing happened, would have been considered reasonable by many, although not all. It is not something I would do, but I can see it happening.
I simply can't get my head round this, but i can understand some people probably do it regularly on holiday when they're in closed places such as a hotel. Where they were, it just seems mental to me for them to do that AND leave one of the doors open.
 
Probably more complacency than neglect. Wealthy people going out enjoying themselves in a country perceived to be very safe and family oriented. They had probably done this previously and it could have become a habit.
It's still neglect complacency or not. Had this happened to a working class person you could imagine a completely different result
 
I simply can't get my head round this, but i can understand some people probably do it regularly on holiday when they're in closed places such as a hotel. Where they were, it just seems mental to me for them to do that AND leave one of the doors open.
Indeed. But, that doesn’t make them guilty of murder, which is the leap the authorities require evidence to make.
 
They didn't though. Again, other facts haven't been reported. There was extensive research into the results from the dogs used to test theor success rate and I believe it was in the 60-70% range depending on dog (three were used I think). So again, not conclusive evidence at all. And the DNA found in the rental car wasn't conclusive either. It had Madeleine's DNA but not all strands that proved it could only have been from her.

However, very good lawyers will make sure that those high but non-conclusive results don't add up to a conviction. Some DAs in America, under political pressure to get a conviction, would have enough from them to nail a suspect though!
Wasn't it closer to 80% and 2 dogs? Maybe it was mis-reported, it just sounds like hard evidence was kind of washed aside by political pressure to throw the original investigators out (who obviously had a bad rep from previous investigations as well).
 
Nope, but as far as i'm aware the original investigator has always claimed its an accident that was covered up. Involuntary manslaughter perhaps?
For that, you still have to assert evidence they killed her, albeit non-premeditated, and the evidence there is usually pieced together by unraveling the cover-up. So far, even with their desire to keep the case in the media, any cover up remains intact. That takes some balls and planning.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top