Harry Maguire

[Dax777]

From the little you’ve seen of him? I’m disappointed Dax, I presumed you had a 20 page dossier on each and every player plying their trade in professional football. :-(

I miss you too Pablo :)

 

[Phil1]

I miss you too Pablo :)

:-)

 

[Zin 'messiah' Zimmer]

Exactly, think he is fantastic from the little I've seen. I struggle to see why Chelsea oukd be inclined to sell.

On the other hand, what's all this talk that Liverpool is in for Koulibally? :(

I’ve seen a lot and he’s gash..... my point stands!

 

[Zin 'messiah' Zimmer]

I’ve seen a lot and he’s gash..... my point stands!

NB: @Dax777 doesn't have a scooby who tricky Ricky was!

 

[The Riot Club]

Yep I remember kaldoon saying 75m in amazement in that inside city video.

I bet he wishes we'd paid it now though.

 

[Paul1970]

Again, what has price got to do with his abilities?

Because in modern day football it’s all about the price . If he was priced at £20-30 million city would be in for him as would most of the top 6 but with it being a totally over the top price city will not go near him .

 

[mosssideblue]

Because in modern day football it’s all about the price . If he was priced at £20-30 million city would be in for him as would most of the top 6 but with it being a totally over the top price city will not go near him .

yeah, OK

 

[p.taker]

I bet he wishes we'd paid it now though.

Totally. Laporte is gash.

 

[The Riot Club]

Totally. Laporte is gash.

Clearly not, but we would now have three world class centre backs instead of trying to find another and being quoted £90m for Maguire. Plus Liverpool would still be shit.

 

[p.taker]

Clearly not, but we would now have three world class centre backs instead of trying to find another and being quoted £90m for Maguire. Plus Liverpool would still be shit.

So you think we would've still been in for Laporte after spending 75m on Virgil?