You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
FIFA Women's WC France 2019
- Thread starter FantasyIreland
- Start date
bangkokblueballs
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Dec 2008
- Messages
- 511
I am in Duoala Cameroon. Think I better stay in the hotel tonight!! It is one of the worst and most dangerous places I have been. Having said that still a great night out if you are willing to brave it
I'm With Stupid
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 6 May 2013
- Messages
- 23,276
I don't get the need for the referees to be women. Nobody insists on female tennis umpires for women's tennis, they just hire the best umpire for the job, because it's a serious competition that needs professionally officiating. By putting sub-standard referees in charge purely to create the image of a female competition, you're devaluing it as a competition. How many of the referees are actually professionals who make a full time living from it? What levels do they actually have experience officiating at? And with that in mind, how many of them have actually refereed a competitive match with VAR before this tournament?
jimharri
Moderator
Elaborate on that.Anyone saying well done Neville rather than Neville is a wanker is wrong in my book.
jimharri
Moderator
Barcon
Well-Known Member
jimharri
Moderator
Won't play for me either now. Basically, he said that Cameroon were a disgrace, that he had no sympathy for them re. the VAR decisions and that they were lucky to get away with a three goal defeat (there's potential for a chant there!) as England should have had a penalty and that Cameroon should have had a player sent off, both correct. And that that wasn't what he recognised as football.It won't play for me mate. What did it say?
KentBlue
Well-Known Member
The only issue I have with what he said was the "We passed the ball well" bit. Really? Are you certain of that?
Barcon
Well-Known Member
Won't play for me either now. Basically, he said that Cameroon were a disgrace, that he had no sympathy for them re. the VAR decisions and that they were lucky to get away with a three goal defeat (there's potential for a chant there!) as England should have had a penalty and that Cameroon should have had a player sent off, both correct. And that that wasn't what he recognised as football.
Cheers. Not bad from the hideous ****.
cleavers
Moderator
He must have thought so because Kirby who only seemed to Cameroon players, played the full 90 minutes, I'm sure she must have passed it at least once to a colleague, but I honestly can't remember one.The only issue I have with what he said was the "We passed the ball well" bit.
jimharri
Moderator
It's not verbatim, but it's more or less what he said. Here you go....Cheers. Not bad from the hideous ****.
Hopefully this one survives a bit longer!
Just think he's a prick of the highest order.Elaborate on that.
jimharri
Moderator
So, you're not saying he was wrong in what he said after the game then.Just think he's a prick of the highest order.
daveiw01
Well-Known Member
Just watching the France v Brazil game and even the commentators are useless. The France goal was disallowed for handball, but the commentators are waffling on about the goalkeeper losing control.
Sigh...
Perhaps I just shouldn't take it seriously? :P
Sigh...
Perhaps I just shouldn't take it seriously? :P
KentBlue
Well-Known Member
I think everybody will agree that what he said was right.
He was right .I think everybody will agree that what he said was right.
No didn't say that the first time.So, you're not saying he was wrong in what he said after the game then.
PragueBlue
Well-Known Member
I think everybody will agree that what he said was right.
Did he say it made a poor game a bit more interesting/exciting?
KentBlue
Well-Known Member
France/Brazil is getting a bit feisty.
PragueBlue
Well-Known Member
After watching England and now France, the USA team should walk this tournament.