Le Havre Oswald
Well-Known Member
Fuck sake just realised the thread had been bumped. Was thinking "Again" and now I feel bad
The issue of Hotpoint devices causing fires has been going on for about a year especially the ones that dry the washing,they should be to blame herI think it's in poor taste to make political points out of a tragedy, but the decision to 'leak' only the chapter of this report that apportions blame to the fire brigade is clearly a dead cat being chucked on the table. There has even been a fair bit of press about blame being apportioned to hotpoint whose faulty appliance was the ignition source. The effect of this is clearly to set the news agenda and public perception prior to the release of the inquiries thoughts about those that took the decision to breach building regs and clad the building in what was essentially a giant external wick.
Thanks,i suppose an orderly evacuation is the priority but like you say the tipping point was maybe called wronglyBecause if the compartment theory works the flat is safe and if they leave people may have to go down stairways into smoke, meeting firefighters coming up and possibly with hoses as trip hazards.
The issue here is when LFB should have realised the building was gone and "stay put" was no longer good advice (especially when control was so overloaded that calls from Grenfell were being taken in Cheshire by staff with little idea of how the flames were engulfing the building).
It's a known problem. Plus prevention has been so effective that it enables the stats to suggest we need fewer firefighters, then when there is a big fire the whole service is stretched (like the moors fires last year). Homes are being lost because what would have been a small kitchen fire gets out of hand because the attendance time is longer, especially for a second pump to get there.)Thanks,i suppose an orderly evacuation is the priority but like you say the tipping point was maybe called wrongly
Interesting view from an ex firefighter on the news,he said years ago there would be lots of big fires but the modern day brigade focus on prevention of fires so now when there is a big fire most of them won't have experience of it just the theory of it,makes sense to me
In theory that comes later, but there's no excuse for nailing the fire service for this.Fuck me the fire brigade being hung out to dry!
What about the cunts that built it?
The local authority that signed it off?
Jesus does EVERYTHING you post have to have an anti-Tory spin on it FFS? Why didn't you just say "council"?
At a time like this instead of thinking about the poor sods who lost their lives and the countless people - including the poor firefighters scarred by this - all you can think of is scoring cheap political points. That is odious mate, it really is.
Some of the newspapers have been their knobbish selves, but the report isn't seeking to blame the individual firefighters on the ground (indeed it praises their "heroics and bravery"). It's pointing out a policy flaw in the higher chain of command, and I think it's only positive that we can learn these lessons so the same mistakes are never made again.The emergency services always get the blame,they are the ones who run into danger not the soft cunts who stand in judgement of them
Fuck me the fire brigade being hung out to dry!
What about the cunts that built it?
The local authority that signed it off?
why are they not focussing on the local authority morons ???
That Dany woman was not coming across well I have to say...always sounded corporate and had an answer for everything ...
Retiring on a few million quid too
Those that signed off a bad cladding, authorised upgrades that compromised the fire stoppage of flats,.Which morons are they and in what context?
I'm sure it will be, but the dead cat thrown on the table yesterday ensures the narrative is already set and the fire brigade take the flack. It's like blaming undertakers for people dying.That should be discussed in the next phase of the report to see if blame can be attributed to those parties.
Those that signed off a bad cladding, authorised upgrades that compromised the fire stoppage of flats,.
I'm sure it will be, but the dead cat thrown on the table yesterday ensures the narrative is already set and the fire brigade take the flack. It's like blaming undertakers for people dying.
It's my personal opinion after what I saw very shortly after the fire with my own eyes.Which morons are they and in what context?
If the fire didn’t happen the way it did then there wouldn’t have been such a loss of life, wrong cladding, fire safety compromised in those flats that the brigade knew nothing about. The stay put policy is a sound advice when the buildings are built to the standards they should be, could they have evaluated sooner probably however i was not on the ground then. Cotton shouldn’t have said she wouldn’t have done things differently, she should have said, knowing what we know now then yes it couldn’t have been handle different. They are putting all the blame on the rescuers rather than the people who created the problem, ducking disgraceful and you won’t change my mind.Well that is a very complex argument which has rumbled on for months, a product used all across the globe, so it will be interesting to see if blame is apportioned.
Funny how you do not want blame attached to the fire service but happy for some other area to be targeted.