Common sense or ethically wrong

  • Thread starter Thread starter ganganvince
  • Start date Start date
My "opinion" is that cheap labour is morally unethical and needs to end.

That's all my argument has been.
And my reply is that the above is not a solution, it is an aspiration. Look what happened to all of the major socialist and communist economies which had similar aspirations. How is pay for the unskilled in Poland these days?
 
Bully for them, it's not the case everywhere, especially Northern England.
No, but most people are doing OK. And we have been through 10 years of austerity and slow growth, so hardly surprising most are not rolling in it. A few - in proportionate terms - are really struggling. And they should have voted Labour. "For the few, not for the many" as their slogan should have read.
 
And my reply is that the above is not a solution, it is an aspiration. Look what happened to all of the major socialist and communist economies which had similar aspirations. How is pay for the unskilled in Poland these days?
I'm not advocating for a socialist style economy.

Do you think;
A) People on low wages are paid just right.
B) People should be paid to cover the cost of living (meaning an increase)
C) People on low wages should be paid much more

For the record, my opinion is B.

If your view is C, i'd agree, that's not sustainable. If it is A, we have nothing to discuss further as we won't agree.
 
Even in Northern England it's not most young people struggling to pay the rent, some yes. Not most.
Wow...

And 90% of people in Scotland don't want to leave the UK. See I can do it too.
 
I'm not advocating for a socialist style economy.

Do you think;
A) People on low wages are paid just right.
B) People should be paid to cover the cost of living (meaning an increase)
C) People on low wages should be paid much more

For the record, my opinion is B.

If your view is C, i'd agree, that's not sustainable. If it is A, we have nothing to discuss further as we won't agree.

I don't accept the terms of the question. If it were paraphrased

A) Would I like it if people on very low pay earned more? Yes
B) Would i like it if people were paid enough to cover the cost of living (meaning an increase)? Yes
C) Would I like people on low wages should be paid much more? Yes

But these are not "solutions".
 
No, but most people are doing OK. And we have been through 10 years of austerity and slow growth, so hardly surprising most are not rolling in it. A few - in proportionate terms - are really struggling. And they should have voted Labour. "For the few, not for the many" as their slogan should have read.
Trust me, a lot of young people did, and with attitudes like that, they will continue to do so.

You want to do away with "Corbynomics" and Momentum, you need to work out a way of paying younger people enough, not "more", ENOUGH, so that they can live comfortably.
 
I don't accept the terms of the question. If it were paraphrased

A) Would I like it if people on very low pay earned more? Yes
B) Would i like it if people were paid enough to cover the cost of living (meaning an increase)? Yes
C) Would I like people on low wages should be paid much more? Yes

But these are not "solutions".
Neither is "get a better job/learn a new skill".

It's woefully ignorant of the situation affecting many people today.

I'm learning a new skill to achieve a new sense of job satisfaction, not because it's going to pay me more (as much as I wish it would do) because it won't as virtually every job in service/hospitality pays diddly dick. I'm doing it because if I have to be earning a shit wage, i'd rather it be for something i'd enjoy doing more than the job I am currently.
 
with the reduction in business regulations that will happen post Brexit this is going to get far far worse than better in my view.
I told him 1,000 times he should have voted Remain but he was never having it. Coordinated, international collaboration is needed to end low pay. And that was only ever going to be possible in the EU where the economic might of the bloc could enforce protectionist policies and the more socially inclined governments are inclined to do something.

Outside the EU, we will be less regulated and more open to cheap imports and cheap labour.
 
It isn't remotely ignorant, nor woefully so. I told you already - repeatedly in fact - I accept how hard it is.
Don't see much empathy if your "solution" is "get a better job/learn a new skill".

It's like you don't understand how difficult it is for many people at present. If it was as easy as you describe, why are there still millions of people supporting Labour's message, mostly young people mind, of wanting £10 an hour? Why haven't they done what you suggested already?
 
Trust me, a lot of young people did, and with attitudes like that, they will continue to do so.

You want to do away with "Corbynomics" and Momentum, you need to work out a way of paying younger people enough, not "more", ENOUGH, so that they can live comfortably.
Attitudes like what? GIving you my opinion on the way things are?

But anyway, regards Momentum etc, yes, that's probably true.
 
Attitudes like what? GIving you my opinion on the way things are?

But anyway, regards Momentum etc, yes, that's probably true.
Telling people "get a better job/learn a new skill" is not exactly the way things are as a realistic solution for many people though, is it.

For the few that can, yes, for the many who can't "meh, fuck 'em"? Is that it?
 
Don't see much empathy if your "solution" is "get a better job/learn a new skill".

It's like you don't understand how difficult it is for many people at present. If it was as easy as you describe, why are there still millions of people supporting Labour's message, mostly young people mind, of wanting £10 an hour? Why haven't they done what you suggested already?
This is becoming a huge waste of time.

What is it with this "If it was as easy as you describe" shit?

For about the 4th time, I FULLY UNDERSTAND IT IS NOT EASY. NOT AT ALL EASY. VERY VERY HARD.
 
This is becoming a huge waste of time.

What is it with this "If it was as easy as you describe" shit?

For about the 4th time, I FULLY UNDERSTAND IT IS NOT EASY. NOT AT ALL EASY. VERY VERY HARD.
THEN WHY DID YOU SUGGEST IT AS AN OPTION!?

Or worse, as a defence for the continuation of cheap labour? Which is what the discussion is about; the end of exploitative cheap labour both foreign and domestic. It's more preferable than just paying low wage workers a little more?
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top