Gordyola
Well-Known Member
It can’t be considered irrefutable if they refused to look at it.
They built, made and hung their entire case on stolen emails.
I would also like to see those emails.
The thing with an email, it’s all about context. It won’t prove a thing as long as the books say otherwise.
That UEFA were trying to broker a deal whilst putting their whole investigation on hacked emails, tells me they were shitting it.
I genuinely don’t think they expected us to say fuck off. They assumed we would take a deal.
The velocity of the punishment is akin to the reaction of a petulant teenager.
This is from a email I received from an employee of Manchester City in 2011
This email is from Manchester City Football Club, (Company Reg No. 40946).
Etihad Stadium, Etihad Campus, Manchester, M11 3FF
This e-mail and any attachments may be confidential and/or legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, you must not use, copy, print or distribute this e-mail or attachments. If you have received it in error please notify the sender immediately and delete all copies of the message and any attachments. The view of the author may not necessarily reflect those of the Company. MCFC makes no representation or warranty as to the absence of viruses in this e-mail or any attachments.
I doubt that stolen hacked emails will be admissible and that rider if on the mail also precludes it
Interestingly all the stolen hacked emails that Der Spiegel published had the bottom half exclude
https://www.spiegel.de/sport/fussba...ostrecke-a293d1c1-0001-0002-0000-000000167278