dronefromsector7G
Well-Known Member
You've heard of them? Talk about using the wrong example. Famous twats.The only band I know whose songs I can name a shitload of, yet haven't heard any.
You've heard of them? Talk about using the wrong example. Famous twats.The only band I know whose songs I can name a shitload of, yet haven't heard any.
Do they "perform" in front of paying "fans"?I disagree. You mentioned pop group but the OP said ‘band’. Do you think the band Anal **** do it primarily for fame? Or have you, like 90-odd% of posters, never heard of them?
I forgot you were in the Bay City Rollers. Tragic that you apparently all got bummed by your manager.x
Well lots of bands reform for the cash - but I back the Pistols on this charge for 2 reasons.
Firstly they hardly made a penny first time round as McClaren helped himself to the money.
2nd they were pretty open about it being the Filthy Lucre tour and doing it for the money rather than pretending it wasnt. Plus lets be honest, not too many folk got to see them 1st time around. I felt they were reclaiming the band and legacy back from McClaren
I asked the same question and waiting a reply.Just out of curiosity, at what point did the sell-out happen in your opinion?
You've heard of them? Talk about using the wrong example. Famous twats.
The Bunnymen allowed The Killing Moon to be used on a commercial during Super Bowl a few years back and got something like $100,000 for it.If any band thinks they will make more money in what is usually a short career, they will take it. And regardless how early fans feel cheated after they go more mainstream, this wouldn't bother me at all.
If people want a band to give up financial security, because they had a copy of a copy of the first gig at The Dog and Duck, and are appalled at the treachery, then go start your own fucking band.
I always found that those who held these, sold out views, weren't musicians, singers, or performers. Never been in a band, couldn't play a fucking note, telling other people who could to forgo financial security because they are a bunch of pretentious pricks.
And no, I'm not bitter, our band never made it. But I can assure you if we did and some twat came up and said you sold out, he would have been knocked out. Pronto.
For us we were just too ahead of our time with our Jazz Funk Folk vibe.
The Bunnymen allowed The Killing Moon to be used on a commercial during Super Bowl a few years back and got something like $100,000 for it.
Fans going mad on messageboards saying the meaning of the song has been tarnished / ruined etc (i did ask what the meaning of the song actually was and didnt get a reply lol)
In the end ibsaid "look, Mac and Will Seargant are approaching 60.... This one deal is their pension. Would you turn it down?"
Again, no reply.
This is it - my feelings and meaning about a song or a group dont pay the band members bills..... It did 30 years ago when i bought the album for £3.99 but it doesnt now.... So they have a choice..... Bank $100K for doing nothing and bang it away for when they are 65 / spend it all on coke or whatever OR turn it down because 5 fans on a messageboard "wont be able to listen to the song again without the same meaning"Surprise surprise. People who have absolutely no fucking idea of the creative process and financial reality, never fail to get on my tits. They seem to wrap themselves in a cloak of self congratulatory bullshit about how other people conduct their careers.
As I said, fed up with selling out, start a fucking band, be offered a deal and turn it down because they wouldn't let you keep that edgy tin can resonance, then come back on so we can laugh at you.
This is it - my feelings and meaning about a song or a group dont pay the band members bills..... It did 30 years ago when i bought the album for £3.99 but it doesnt now.... So they have a choice..... Bank $100K for doing nothing and bang it away for when they are 65 / spend it all on coke or whatever OR turn it down because 5 fans on a messageboard "wont be able to listen tobthe song agaon without the same menaning"
Yes they did. A relatively small number. If money/fame was their main motivation they would’ve chosen a less offensive name, less offensive song titles and wrote less offensive lyrics. Maybe then they could’ve been properly famous and richDo they "perform" in front of paying "fans"?
Folk.went mad when Johnny Rotten took 40K to advertise butter. I was like "well done John!":) I would do it just to annoy that type of ****.
Folk.went mad when Johnny Rotten took 40K to advertise butter. I was like "well done John!"
If some butter company is daft enough to offer it him, why should he be daft enough to turn it down?