UEFA FFP investigation - CAS decision to be announced Monday, 13th July 9.30am BST

What do you think will be the outcome of the CAS hearing?

  • Two-year ban upheld

    Votes: 197 13.1%
  • Ban reduced to one year

    Votes: 422 28.2%
  • Ban overturned and City exonerated

    Votes: 815 54.4%
  • Other

    Votes: 65 4.3%

  • Total voters
    1,499
Status
Not open for further replies.
Well I looked through the last 3 or 4 pages (they have twice the number of posts per page as we do) and I'm never getting that time back am I? It's just the usual idiots spouting the same old nonsense, they're in total denial about everything. Some went into a sidebar of discussing how the internet and social media have made people bitter and twisted and just don't get the irony of their thread. Apparently they think that if the CL gets cancelled this season they'll be awarded a new trophy as the holders 'as it's in UEFA's rules'.

@Prestwich_Blue seems to have really gotten under their skin though, so kudos PB.
Oh bless `em,the poor (ar) souls.
 
I will give you a clue, someone approached the 9 clubs, all but one club agreed to write the letter. The ninth club refused. That club is owned by a Saudi bigwig and they just happen to be bezzy mates with our owners. What amazes me is that who ever approached sheff utd clearly did not have a clue as to who the owner was.

Okay.. so if they’re bezzy mates presumably they will or have told our owners who it was and given us the evidence ?
 
Okay.. so if they’re bezzy mates presumably they will or have told our owners who it was and given us the evidence ?
I can take a guess, which explains why Burnley are involved. This twat is behind it.

PA-1881715.jpg-e1503760483191.jpg
 
Does anyone know if the FA have charged the gang of 8 for bringing the game into disrepute?, if this was any other sport the gang of 8 would be thrown out, firstly for creating a gang with the aim to gain advantage, and secondly attempting to gain influence on a governing body, also nobody has denied it?
This is far more important than a suggestive email
 
Does anyone know if the FA have charged the gang of 8 for bringing the game into disrepute?, if this was any other sport the gang of 8 would be thrown out, firstly for creating a gang with the aim to gain advantage, and secondly attempting to gain influence on a governing body, also nobody has denied it?
This is far more important than a suggestive email

no.

this is what the PL refer to as ‘clubs acting in good faith towards each other.’
 
Suppose your kids get pocket money of £10 a week. One of them comes to you and says "Dad, can I have an advance on my pocket money as I want to buy something for £30?" So you give him the extra £20 but don't give him any for the next couple of weeks.

Now I haven't seen the contracts. I don't know what the arrangement was. But sure as hell this cretin you're allowing to wind you up doesn't either. Sheikh Mansour was chairman of the company, or chairman of the company that owned the company, that owned Aabar & Etisalat. But that doesn't automatically make them related parties. You have to show there's a significant degree of control being exercised over those companies by him to show that.

And I'll repeat it again that whatever we did or didn't do in 2013, we failed FFP based on the 2100/12 and 2012/13 financial years so whatever we did made fuck all difference.

It does show the David Gill`s accountancy firm is absolutely shit though, you would have thought that they understood the criteria and followed the money to source, ie did the money come from mummy or daddy
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.