COVID-19 — Coronavirus

[twosips]

Not necessarily, again a lot of todays report from as far back as March. It must get to a point were they have caught up the majority of missed ones with better reporting methods and we’ll get closer to true daily figures again.

Didn't realise that. Link to the source?

 

[Blue Maverick]

I agree it will take a lot of people a while to be confident about big crowds again, how long who knows. The bit I don’t agree with, for me at least, is those saying they will stop all together if some games are played behind closed doors first. Firstly I don’t see why you’d stop something you enjoy to make some point. Also it’s no surprise that football has entered into very expensive contracts that may have contractual obligations. Third a lot of people might get some enjoyment watching some football while they can’t do much else. We know it isn’t ideal but there are bigger things to worry about.

I don’t have sky or bt how do I watch the games I’ve paid for, will sky put them on for free on terrestrial tv I doubt it, sick to death of it all if I’m honest what the hell will they do with the fa cup if you get to the semis and the final an empty Wembley!!

 

[kaz7]

Out of todays in england

Patients were aged between 27 and 100 years old - and 56 of them had no known underlying health condition

I remember when this started of with people in their 80's,then everyone had underlying heath issues

 

[blueparrot]

2 World Wars didn’t stop people going to football matches so the aftermath of this virus (when it eventually comes) won’t destroy Club’s fan bases. There will be people who stop going and several posters have pointed out (in the past) that our support is a bit jaded anyway, so City might be hit harder than some other Clubs. Time will tell and there might be more chances for new season card holders / families to get seats together.

I am not missing the football that much and I’ve found not being able to go to the rugby league a bigger loss. I reckon the season will restart behind closed doors around end June / July (because of money)! but it might be safest for the season to be written off completely.

My guess too would be June / July finish season behind closed doors. Break for end July August . Start new season September, the unknown is will we have fans back in September.

 

[blueparrot]

Didn't realise that. Link to the source?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/world-52239925

“
BREAKINGFurther 866 deaths announced in England


NHS England has announced 866 further deaths of people who had tested positive for Covid-19.

It brings the total number of confirmed deaths in hospitals in England to 8,114.

Of the new deaths announced today, 117 occurred on 9 April, 720 between 1 April and 8 April, and 29 in March.

”

 

[SWP's back]

Out of todays in england

Patients were aged between 27 and 100 years old - and 56 of them had no known underlying health condition

I remember when this started of with people in their 80's,then everyone had underlying heath issues

I remember when it was going to disappear in April (with spring and warmer weather) and only 10,000 would die and anyone that disagreed was a merchant of doom.

 

[Dicko69]

Not necessarily, again a lot of todays report from as far back as March. It must get to a point were they have caught up the majority of missed ones with better reporting methods and we’ll get closer to true daily figures again.

But how many died in the last 24hours aren't in today's figures? We don't know if that's more or less than the "missed ones" from previous

 

[twosips]

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/world-52239925

“
BREAKINGFurther 866 deaths announced in England


NHS England has announced 866 further deaths of people who had tested positive for Covid-19.

It brings the total number of confirmed deaths in hospitals in England to 8,114.

Of the new deaths announced today, 117 occurred on 9 April, 720 between 1 April and 8 April, and 29 in March.

”

Interesting, cheers. I wonder if as you said we'll see them starting to catch up eventually and it'll go down. Hopefully. I guess we just don't know though how much previous weeks figures have been affected by this and its all relative.

 

[SWP's back]

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/world-52239925

“
BREAKINGFurther 866 deaths announced in England


NHS England has announced 866 further deaths of people who had tested positive for Covid-19.

It brings the total number of confirmed deaths in hospitals in England to 8,114.

Of the new deaths announced today, 117 occurred on 9 April, 720 between 1 April and 8 April, and 29 in March.

”

This is why daily figures are useless. 117 in one day, some 15% of the total announced.

 

[Claytop]

Didn't realise that. Link to the source?

https://www.england.nhs.uk/statistics/statistical-work-areas/covid-19-daily-deaths/

Download the 10th April daily one. There was a death that happened on 5th March that was included in today’s figure.

 

[RACHACE]

29 in Wales i believe.

Peoffery will be able to confirm.

 

[SWP's back]

Still initial findings. this is the translation of the summary:

Have you still been checking the weekly death figures to see how many additional deaths the U.K. is experiencing against the average for this time of year?

 

[kaz7]

I remember when it was going to disappear in April (with spring and warmer weather) and only 10,000 would die and anyone that disagreed was a merchant of doom.

I was looking back the start of this thread,i was feeling that it wasn't on my radar before wembley but i posted loads before that,i clearly didn't see it being as serious as it was

 

[True_Blue69]

I remember when it was going to disappear in April (with spring and warmer weather) and only 10,000 would die and anyone that disagreed was a merchant of doom.

To be fair it was the people were quoting 6 million dying who were labelled the merchants of doom, quite rightly so.

 

[Nellies left peg]

Seriously is that where you live Nellie ?

No it was just a story mate

 

[SWP's back]

To be fair it was the people were quoting 6 million dying who were labelled the merchants of doom, quite rightly so.

Worldwide or U.K.? Don’t recall anyone saying 9% of the U.K. would die from it.

 

[True_Blue69]

Worldwide or U.K.? Don’t recall anyone saying 9% of the U.K. would die from it.

It was worldwide. Between 5 and 7 million was being banded around. To be fair the people were using the WHO stats as evidence and we all know what a shower of shit they have proven to be.

 

[blueparrot]

But how many died in the last 24hours aren't in today's figures? We don't know if that's more or less than the "missed ones" from previous

No we don’t which is really my point about using the daily death figure as an indicator of anything. Without going over yesterdays debate, only the numbers in hospital and critical care are a reasonable guide.

 

[SWP's back]

It was worldwide. Between 5 and 7 million was being banded around. To be fair the people were using the WHO stats as evidence and we all know what a shower of shit they have proven to be.

Don’t be so sure bud. We’re only 4 months in and we’ve got another 12-18 months before we get a viable vaccines going and so far this hasn’t hit India/Pakistan and South America in any meaningful way. 1% death rate means it only needs 0.6bn people (10% of the worlds population) infected to kill 6m worldwide.

 

[True_Blue69]

Don’t be so sure bud. We’re only 4 months in and we’ve got another 12-18 months before we get a viable vaccines going and so far this hasn’t hit India/Pakistan and South America in any meaningful way. 1% death rate means it only needs 0.6bn people (10% of the worlds population) infected to kill 6m worldwide.

Well it's on around 90k at the moment and a lot of countries are coming to their peak. If it does get to the numbers you mentioned it will have to be a monumental fuck up by the powers that be around the world. I hope I'm right in saying that I can't see it getting anywhere near that.