Not quite sure what you mean. As of 13th March Greece had 1 recorded death. Subsequently it has risen to 143.and yet the number of death related cases had already started to fall a week before lockdown in England. Go figure.
Not quite sure what you mean. As of 13th March Greece had 1 recorded death. Subsequently it has risen to 143.and yet the number of death related cases had already started to fall a week before lockdown in England. Go figure.
This,we assumed immunity,nearly four months on an nobody will confirm immunity still and this virus is throwing up surprises everyday
Was a fucking idiotic thing to post.A very slanted and one-eyed article that seems more concerned with making points about the constitution than with people's wellbeing.
Probably true, but as I say they started taking action as soon as the first case, not first death, occurred. They had taken notice of first China and later Italy and made the decision to keep the numbers as low as possible.I'd imagine Spain Italy France and the UK have a hell of a lot more people visiting them than Greece in February and March too.
I apologise in advance for wandering into the middle of this but what is your conclusion based on the timescales you outlined?Karen, let's do some very easy maths together ok?
Im going to use the term mean.
1) What is the mean time between infection and symptoms?
2) What is the mean time between symptoms and death?
answer 1) 5 days
answer 2) 18 days
add them together = 23 days.
So from catching it to dying takes on average 23 days.
3) When did the most people in English hospitals die from covid (the peak)?
answer 3) 8th April.
4) when did they catch it?
answer 4) 23 days before the 8th April which is 16th of March
Here comes the big one!
When did the UK go into "lockdown"?
I'll let you answer that yourself and see if you can draw any conclusions.
Probably true, but as I say they started taking action as soon as the first case, not first death, occurred. They had taken notice of first China and later Italy and made the decision to keep the numbers as low as possible.
In addition they can if they keep their borders closed start with the new normal a earlier and more safely than we are going to do.
A tiny percentage of young and/or healthy have died. Much fewer than a typical Flu causes in those groups.
That's not quite right. Yes COVID-19 disproportinately effects the old but Flu deaths normally occur in this same age group.A tiny percentage of young and/or healthy have died. Much fewer than a typical Flu causes in those groups.
And then started to rise again.and yet the number of death related cases had already started to fall a week before lockdown in England. Go figure.
I’d wait for the link yet. I don’t necessarily believe it.I had no idea. Interesting to know.
All plays a huge part though which makes it difficult to try and compare small nations doing well to countries like the UK and USA. 1000s of people landing every hour travelling into your cities, countries scared of being the first one to make a major call to put travel bans in place and commit economic suicide.
We are trying to make simple answers to very complex situations.
As we went into lockdown on the 23rd March, it's pretty clear that social distancing a week or so earlier had a massive effect on outcomes.Karen, let's do some very easy maths together ok?
Im going to use the term mean.
1) What is the mean time between infection and symptoms?
2) What is the mean time between symptoms and death?
answer 1) 5 days
answer 2) 18 days
add them together = 23 days.
So from catching it to dying takes on average 23 days.
3) When did the most people in English hospitals die from covid (the peak)?
answer 3) 8th April.
4) when did they catch it?
answer 4) 23 days before the 8th April which is 16th of March
Here comes the big one!
When did the UK go into "lockdown"?
I'll let you answer that yourself and see if you can draw any conclusions.
Research from South Korea indicates that reinfections were actually due to false positive tests:
https://news.sky.com/story/coronavirus-scientists-conclude-people-cannot-be-infected-twice-11981721
https://www.livescience.com/coronavirus-reinfections-were-false-positives.html
As to short term immunity B and T lymphocyte cells are now know to exist for at least 3 months from people who were ill (not mild illness).
Medium and long term immunity will be dependent on whether B & T lymphocyte mory cells created in small numbers are bound to our bone marrow and how fast the virus mutates.
You don't think that Greece, a country beset by economic problems didn't think about that.
As I say they should be up and running sooner than many countries.
I appreciate that they are conference rather than PL but had the UK done something similar we would be able to restart the economy much sooner than we will do.
Would you believe any information coming out of China? I wouldn't. South Korea, Sindapre and Japan are the nations I am most interested in.Probable as you suggest that we have some degree of immunity and also very likely that cv19 is not biphasic as this has not been exhibited in other coronaviruses (not known for rna viruses) - it's the effectiveness of that immunity which needs to be reviewed and analysed. I am surprised that the Chinese have not come out with any data on this yet as I think they are the only country with the scientific capacity and more importantly ability (I suspect there won't be any moral compass to guide them on the ethics of this) to fast track these types of tests with the pool of existing positive people they have, especially considering that they are quite a few months ahead of everyone.