GOULDYBOBS
Well-Known Member
Who gives a fuckThis place is sure going to be a lot quieter without all the people who are going to stop watching football because of this.
Who gives a fuckThis place is sure going to be a lot quieter without all the people who are going to stop watching football because of this.
Why ? Does that rule out people from commenting on football now ?This place is sure going to be a lot quieter without all the people who are going to stop watching football because of this.
This place is sure going to be a lot quieter without all the people who are going to stop watching football because of this.
Good post.Of course people will watch it when it comes back, and at the same time of course people are entitled to feel totally disenchanted, and even kinda repulsed, about the idea of it coming back at the moment. Football's importance has never been questioned in this way in our lifetime. For many, and I genuinely believe this to be true, they've realised how unessential it actually is. Being surrounded by death will do that to most people. It *does* feel unimportant at the moment...
However, they will likely tune back in, because deep down we all do want some semblance of normality, and we do love City. It'll be something to hold onto, and despite our better judgments morally, when its on, we'll have nothing else to do, so we'll watch it. We just don't like the idea of what City and football could mean at the moment. It feels gross to be perfectly honest, and that's fair enough isn't it? It doesn't make those people actual hypocrites, it makes them human. Conflicting thoughts on this are only natural, so there's no need to judge people or be sanctimonious about it. Just allow people these conflicting thoughts. It's a pretty awful and unprecedented time.
There's a difference between having conflicted thoughts, and declaring you're done with the entire sport if it comes back.
So we should all just ignore everything that's posted because everyone can't control their emotions at the moment?
Most comments I've read are saying they're not interested in watching it right now and/or without fans, that's certainly where I sit, and have consistently said so, if its not safe for me to watch it, then its no more safe for players to play imho.There's a difference between having conflicted thoughts, and declaring you're done with the entire sport if it comes back.
Of course people will watch it when it comes back, and at the same time of course people are entitled to feel totally disenchanted, and even kinda repulsed, about the idea of it coming back at the moment. Football's importance has never been questioned in this way in our lifetime. For many, and I genuinely believe this to be true, they've realised how unessential it actually is. Being surrounded by death will do that to most people. It *does* feel unimportant at the moment...
However, they will likely tune back in, because deep down we all do want some semblance of normality, and we do love City. It'll be something to hold onto, and despite our better judgments morally, when its on, we'll have nothing else to do, so we'll watch it. We just don't like the idea of what City and football could mean at the moment. It feels gross to be perfectly honest, and that's fair enough isn't it? It doesn't make those people actual hypocrites, it makes them human. Conflicting thoughts on this are only natural, so there's no need to judge people or be sanctimonious about it. Just allow people these conflicting thoughts. It's a pretty awful and unprecedented time.
Yes, precisely. How many of the people who have no interest in watching it right now without fans, will in fact be sitting there watching it without fans as soon as it starts?
I'll guess it's most of them.
Ok so why bother posting at all?
If the comments are meaningless and you'll have changed your mind completely in 2 weeks - and you know it before you post - what's the point?
What do you get from posting that football coming back is abhorrent, and you're totally against it, knowing full well that the words are meaningless?
Twice a week during social distances training, daily when games start.
Read the news before discussing it ffs.
Well I'd be surprised if people who don't watch football anymore still commented on it?
I take it you will return to watching football when we only have the usual 1,500 deaths a day as per pre virus averagesJust maybe people are not prepared to line Sky/BT/Premier leagues pockets and will not "watch" behind closed doors football in protest , there are plenty of other ways to keep in touch with the game , match reports , written media etc., Bluemoon ,and all for free.
What the premier league and other interested parties are doing is direspectful to the over 30k dead and hundreds of health workers giving or risking their lives , i want a return to watching footy but not when 500 a day are losing their lives. Finishing the season now and even giving the Dippers the title and then getting the game ready for Aug/Sept start (hopefully when we are getting on top of this virus) , is the sensible option , but if the Premier league force through a June start , i will not contribute a bean or watch any football until the situation improves.
I'm beginning to see how this might work, i hadn't realised that so much thought had been put into this cunning plan, said Blackadder to Baldrick.#PremierLeague players will be tested for coronavirus at least twice a week, including in the 48 hours before they are due to train, it was confirmed at a meeting today. [
@SkySportsNews
Top-flight managers were told in a meeting today that all team and coach meetings will continue to be done by videoconference, and all data and video recordings of training sessions are to be made available to the #PremierLeague. [
@SkySportsNews
Training Ground Protocols | #PremierLeague: - Players to drive alone to training in kit - Temperature checked at training ground entrance - Designated parking space (three away others) - No food at training ground - Train in group of five for a 75 minutes max [1/3] [
@SkyKaveh
- Encouraged to wear mask or snood - No tackling or spitting - Everything disinfected: balls, pitch, goalposts, cones, equipment - Players must maintain social distancing at all times [2/3]
- Injured players treated by physio wearing PPE (must include minimum of mask, gloves and apron) - After training, players will drive straight home
Foreign players returning to England will not be allowed into their training ground for 14 days. [
@SkyKaveh
How the fuck can they do this for a contact sport and the training they have to do face to face not over zoom or whatever
Kill me now
You're quite correct, footballers are characterised by their unwillingness to sing. Who knew this would save their lives? They never socialise after a game either so i can understand it being safe to play football. As long as the fans don't sing then, we should all be able to gather 2m apart outside the ground before the game to clap them in NHS style and then after the game clap them as they are leaving. If any fan gets over excited and sings or chants , there will be an audible signal such as a klaxon that indicates we should all run around but observe the 2 m distance rule.If the clubs could paint some floor markings and lines then i see how it can work, game on! My mentality is saved . It'll be like an adult version of 'Runaround 'with MIKE REID . Those old blues will remember, so no training is required. Perhaps we can get TV personalities to shout Runaround! Piers Morgan at Arsenal for example , perhaps Noel Gallagher for us?Players aren't likely to sing (shown to be the most dangerous activity of all because it drags up large quantities of virus particles in droplets from deep in the lungs), and they are unlikely to be socialising before and after the game. There's travel too.
Players are also on the move almost all of the time in the open air which makes transmission of a significant viral load unlikely. Transmission is a function of the time you spend close in the company of an infected person and that's very clearly a much more significant problem for fans than players. On top of that players will be very regularly tested.
Governments across Europe have approved outdoors sports without crowds presumably because they think they have a different risk profile.
So the example they show on TV is of 2 players , I think Justin and Sebastian , playing a game of singles tennis. The precautions beingI know you there is some cynicism but the evidence is that the risk settings for respiratory illnesses are typically in closed environments.
Football maybe a lucrative industry but the approval was for outdoor sports in general.
@Marvin
https://www.givemesport.com/1554721...how-footballers-are-vulnerable-to-coronavirus
surely you cant ignore this post
hotbed for viruses
very susceptible
immunosuppressed