BlueHammer85
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 13 Oct 2010
- Messages
- 40,779
Is that legit? I fucking hope not
‘All of Man City’s proceeds from the sale of licensed face coverings will be donated to Covid recovery efforts in Manchester.’
Is that legit? I fucking hope not
Ta bud, the link looked decidedly dodgy but upon checking the official site, as you say, seems legit. Hmmm, maybe I was a bit quick to dismiss. If the £ goes to the right place, that's good. Got a nagging feeling this isn't 100% altruistic.Yes they are selling them on the website.
Ta bud, the link looked decidedly dodgy but upon checking the official site, as you say, seems legit. Hmmm, maybe I was a bit quick to dismiss. If the £ goes to the right place, that's good. Got a nagging feeling this isn't 100% altruistic.
Just looks a bit cheap (the punt, not the cost), bandwagon-esque, marketing ploy. And they're extortionately priced, which tells me this may not be a wholly philanthropic venture.It came from the club by e mail, it is legit. Why not sell them? To be honest I haven't seen any for sale anywhere so at least the club are getting some out there.
New report suggests virus was subtly genetically modified and that it must have escaped from a lab.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/20...virus-began-accident-disease-escaped-chinese/
Holy shit if true.
The report:
https://www.cambridge.org/core/serv..._general_method_of_action_for_infectivity.pdf
Just looks a bit cheap (the punt, not the cost), bandwagon-esque, marketing ploy. And they're extortionately priced, which tells me this may not be a wholly philanthropic venture.
Jesus!New report suggests virus was subtly genetically modified and that it must have escaped from a lab.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/20...virus-began-accident-disease-escaped-chinese/
Holy shit if true.
The report:
https://www.cambridge.org/core/serv..._general_method_of_action_for_infectivity.pdf
It came from the club by e mail, it is legit. Why not sell them? To be honest I haven't seen any for sale anywhere so at least the club are getting some out there.
Just looks a bit cheap (the punt, not the cost), bandwagon-esque, marketing ploy. And they're extortionately priced, which tells me this may not be a wholly philanthropic venture.
Jesus!
I’d read about it escaping by mistake with bats getting out of cages and attacking scientists in the lab, but not that it was genetically altered by humans.
China need to answer a lot of questions... they won’t though, of course... probably won’t even be asked any!
400,000 dead in 5 months, fuck known how many by the end of a year.
New report suggests virus was subtly genetically modified and that it must have escaped from a lab.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/20...virus-began-accident-disease-escaped-chinese/
Holy shit if true.
The report:
https://www.cambridge.org/core/serv..._general_method_of_action_for_infectivity.pdf
The Telegraph and The Mail seem keen to play this report up, for whatever reason. For the sake of balance, here’s The Independent’s take on it:New report suggests virus was subtly genetically modified and that it must have escaped from a lab.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/20...virus-began-accident-disease-escaped-chinese/
Holy shit if true.
The report:
https://www.cambridge.org/core/serv..._general_method_of_action_for_infectivity.pdf
The researchers claim to have discovered clues suggesting key elements were “inserted” into the virus’s genetic sequence and may not have evolved naturally — a prospect contested by almost every other scientist studying the virus’s makeup.
The study had been rejected by various journals and rewritten several times to remove accusatory claims about China before it was published in the Quarterly Review of Biophysics Discovery, according to The Telegraph. Initial co-author John Fredrik Moxnes, a chief scientific adviser to the Norwegian military, reportedly asked for his name to be removed.
Having read the report and the comments on it in the Telegraph article, any changes to an original bat coronavirus are very subtle indeed and why the tone of the initial report led to so many rejecting it out of hand. The report has subsequently been reworked to concentrate on the virus spike binding mechanisms and the question it poses is now "How did the virus acquire such a perfect human binding mechanism naturally?" Which more scientists are prepared to accept.Jesus!
I’d read about it escaping by mistake with bats getting out of cages and attacking scientists in the lab, but not that it was genetically altered by humans.
China need to answer a lot of questions... they won’t though, of course... probably won’t even be asked any!
400,000 dead in 5 months, fuck known how many by the end of a year.
New report suggests virus was subtly genetically modified and that it must have escaped from a lab.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/20...virus-began-accident-disease-escaped-chinese/
Holy shit if true.
The report:
https://www.cambridge.org/core/serv..._general_method_of_action_for_infectivity.pdf
They must have seen my post from Tuesday!!I think offering face masks is overdue mate
Nobody wants to be accused of starting WW4 (even if a very cold one like WW3) and China has a track record of bullying smaller countries into submission. Hence why certain people didn't want to be associated with the report.The Telegraph and The Mail seem keen to play this report up, for whatever reason. For the sake of balance, here’s The Independent’s take on it:
Admission rates are going down across the country according to stat although I wonder if increased admissions in Tameside has anything to do with reports that people have been breaking lockdown by going to Werneth Low. That said Tameside does have the second lowest infection rate per head in Greater Manchester so maybe it's a blipSo it seems the main ward at Tameside Hospital dealing with COVID-19 is filling up again :(
I hope its not the same at other hospitals.