Trevor Morley's Tache
Well-Known Member
That can't be a real quote, even for her, surely?
That can't be a real quote, even for her, surely?
Elizabeth and Mary both carried out religious genocides.
Elizabeth and Mary both carried out religious genocides. Those were pretty bad.
They weren’t only known for that.
Colston became famous as a tyrannical slave trader.
i had a conversation with an 'irish-american' friend recently who it turned out didn't realise there was an issue between protestants and catholics. she was under the impression both groups consider themselves irish and want the british out. my facepalm nearly knocked me outi find that very frustrating about Americans....especially the "oh im Irish" thing...no you're not, you're American...your parents/grand parents/great grandparents/great great grandparents were Irish. Their lack of history seems to implore them to latch on to any identity they can....
Or learn from it and improve what needs improving.Are we going to remove every statue, street sign, building associated with the slave trade era?
suppose most of Liverpool, Glasgow and a large number of Manchester buildings are going then??
Let’s just delete our history.
That Henry VIII was a bit of a scallywag, wasn’t he.Well do you have specifics?
The bloke that ended up in the river earned his fortune from slavery and whilst there’s a statue because he then used that money for some good, he’s only famous because of slavery.
A king that does bad is famous because he’s a king.
i had a conversation with an 'irish-american' friend recently who it turned out didn't realise there was an issue between protestants and catholics. she was under the impression both groups consider themselves irish and want the british out. my facepalm nearly knocked me out
He became famous for donating his fortune to the city, hence why the Victorians built him a statue long after he died.
That Henry VIII was a bit of a scallywag, wasn’t he.
Get your point and I don’t necessarily disagree with it, but why differentiate between before and after 1833.Slavery was abolished in the UK in 1833 so we can only discuss those prior to that.
Again, people involved in slavery at the time. when it was a social norm, may have done greater things outside of the trade, like the founding fathers of the US but Colston was only famous due to money he earned as a slave trader and a notoriously brutal one at that.
.
We over here have a rather different take on Oliver Cromwell over here and are thought extensively about his part in Irish history, which quite frankly doesn’t flatter the guy.
But that’s barely a paragraph in how he’s thought in English schools.
And cheer on the ‘Cause’ singing rebel songs putting a few dollars in the collection box, from 3000 miles away, not caring where the money is going.or its some "Chad" using it to try and show how much drinks and likes to fight...
Fair enough.Trust me plenty over here think Cromwell was a ****
I don’t know the answer to that but I do know that Queen Anne is dead.Is there many statues of them about though?
Get your point and I don’t necessarily disagree with it, but why differentiate between before and after 1833.
The effects of prior events don’t just suddenly stop. There are always multiple moving parts at play in any monumental decisions in history.
Also, History is looked at differently depending on where you are looking at it from.
Colonialism/Imperialism is quite a different experience depending on whether your colonising or being colonised.
We over here have a rather different take on Oliver Cromwell over here and are thought extensively about his part in Irish history, which quite frankly doesn’t flatter the guy.
But that’s barely a paragraph in how he’s thought in English schools.
Anyway must resist.
Back to George Floyd anyone.
I didn't say it didn't go on. In fact I said the opposite.The word “ostracised” was used in reply to a post where he was discussing racists being ostracised on to an island.
Of course we don’t have segregated schools or universities. I actually think the UK is a whole lot better than many countries on this issue, but there is definitely room for improvement.
When Raheem Sterling posted the example of how Tosin and Phil Foden were reported on differently, do you think he imagined it?
When Andre Gray says he’s been pulled over by the police dozens of times, do you think he imagined it? Do you think Jamie Vardy gets pulled over as much?
When the Prime Minister uses phrases like “piccaninnies”, “letterboxes” and “watermelon smiles”, did we all just imagine it?
Should the people affected just accept being demeaned and dehumanised by the PM? Do they have “a chip on their shoulder” if they don’t?
The oppression that non-white people face in the UK is not segregated schools or universities etc. It’s dealing with preconceptions and being judged differently based not on how they behave, but how they look.
Just because you might not see it in your day to day life, it doesn’t mean that it doesn’t go on.
As I said Ban-jani, I would not necessarily disagree with your substantive point.We’re talking about why Colston and not monarchs who have done wrong.
My argument is Colston only got where he was due to being a brutal slave trader, nothing more or less.