CAS judgement: UEFA ban overturned, City exonerated (report out p603)

Manchester1894 said:
This quote says it all for me..

"The club issued a statement in response to the new allegations, and requested that it be printed in full - which the newspaper refused to do."

We want them to print MORE not less. The context again is that they are suggesting something illegal or that we've lied. This time we're taking them head on and calling their bluff.
Click to expand...
Where is this quote from?
 
I think we e reached the point where City need to pick out a couple of these so called Journalists - Conn, Harris and Evans - and maybe Der Spiegel and hit them with a writ. Something has to be done because they are like rabid dogs that just won’t let go. We have to break the circle of hate and hit them where it hurts. I’d also ban the Guardian and the BBC from the campus and the ground for 6 months - just to focus their minds.
 
Don Karleone said:
Legal fucking action. It's beyond a joke now.
Click to expand...

This, Until the club stops treating everything with kids gloves and actually starts going after certain people and media groups, it will continue. A few legal actions will show people not to spout crap about the club. Any Tom, Dick or Harry who clearly states we cheat should be taken to the cleaners by the club
 
I see the date on the e mail is 2013 maybe that is time barred in any event. Should apply for an injunction preventing publication of stolen e mails by anyone. Ah well can see this is going to run and run.
 
Rammyblues said:
I see the date on the e mail is 2013 maybe that is time barred in any event. Should apply for an injunction preventing publication of stolen e mails by anyone. Ah well can see this is going to run and run.
Click to expand...

The email might be time barred, I'm not sure on that respect, but I am sure that if Pearce has perjured himself then the question of the email being time barred becomes irrelevant.
 
Ardwick Green Blue said:
Surely the key point is that there is a verifiable audit trail that shows where any monies have come from? Presumably that was what was demonstrated at CAS so a partial email means fuck all as there is hard evidence showing where it all came from.
Click to expand...

Yes City had accountancy firms audit the transactions, and this was used as evidence, together with CEO evidence.
 
LongsightM13 said:
Der Spiegel. Unsurprising from those crooked lowlifes
Click to expand...
But
'The club issued a statement in response to the new allegations, and requested that it be printed in full - which the newspaper refused to do.'

The 'newspaper' seems to leave it slightly ambiguous.
ie
The MEN is refusing to print the whole City statement in full as requested by City. But carried the gist of it.
Or
Der Speigel refusing to print the whole City Statement in full, as requested by City. (unknown what DS has printed of it)

Edit: I'm just making sure @M18CTID doesn't think it was the email that City asked to be printed in full
 
Ric said:
Statement from City:

“The questions and matters raised by Der Spiegel appear to be a cynical attempt to publicly re-litigate and undermine a case that has been fully adjudicated, after detailed proceedings and due process, by the Court of Arbitration for Sport.

“Manchester City’s policy remains not to comment on out of context materials purported to have been criminally obtained from City Football Group and Manchester City personnel.”
Click to expand...

Fuck that.

These ****s need a fucking good kicking.

We should be absolutely snotting these fucks all over the place.
 
M12Blue said:
Harris tweet is bollocks really, twisting the email. Pearce correcting a prearranged payment is he not.
Click to expand...

thats what i thought ...i my language theres been a cock up with a direct debt and its short by 25quid could you send that short fall please.....or something like that !
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top