CAS judgement: UEFA ban overturned, City exonerated (report out p603)

These deceitful fucktards are still trying the same underhand tactics.

1. It dosent matter if the email is true.
2. it doesnt matter if they doctured it to make us look guilty.
3. Cas ruled that these snippets were taken out of context and did not portray the facts.

This toilet paper can wipe MCFC ass!!!

Beaten now do one you pricks
 
dickie davies said:
See Longsight's post
Click to expand...
What's stopping City physically reclaiming their own property from their possession? I'm no legal expert but I think City's legal rights for their own property would outweigh some German toilet papers journalistic loophole rights.
 
Citizen Green said:
I think this fell into the 'G14's' lap and they took full advantage of it, rather than they invented it as some of the conspiracy theorists would have you believe.

We now have to guard against what ever else Der Speigel may release.
Click to expand...

And how precisely would you "guard" against that ?
 
It’s incredible that City’s hacked emails are the only ones that DS seem to be still publishing after almost , what 2-3 years.

or maybe not, if the harbour of the hacked emails has a singular agenda pushed by a cartel against a singular club.

has anything been published by DS on any other club? /rubs chin
 
The issue is even if it is from a different AD institute, it contradicts his statement to CAS.

It’s not an issue us as such as it doesn’t change that it not being enough evidence anyway. It’s not a good look though, particularly for him.
 
Having just read Conn’s latest piece of shit I am not overly concerned. The waters are so muddy and murky, so much innuendo and lack of context I would assume our lawyers would more than love to have a second outing at CAS and I doubt UEFA would fancy rerunning this whole two year shitshow. Pearce has admitted confusion over the way payments were made, I am no expert but this seems small beer, them cuunts at Der Nazi know anything on City will generate interest but I get the impression most people are bored with it, as in none City fans. BBC aren’t running with it, maybe others will be it smacks of sour grapes at a time when most of us have enough our plates.
 
meltonblue said:
The issue is even if it is from a different AD institute, it contradicts his statement to CAS.

It’s not an issue us as such as it doesn’t change that it not being enough evidence anyway. It’s not a good look though, particularly for him.
Click to expand...
Hardly conclusive as CAS ruled some had been doctored,anything else they put out is probably the same,it is clear the cartel do not want this smear campaign to stop
 
Metalartin said:
What's stopping City physically reclaiming their own property from their possession? I'm no legal expert but I think City's legal rights for their own property would outweigh some German toilet papers journalistic loophole rights.
Click to expand...

id imagine the paper would say they were protected by their journalistic interests
 
Jam Tomorrow said:
Having just read Conn’s latest piece of shit I am not overly concerned. The waters are so muddy and murky, so much innuendo and lack of context I would assume our lawyers would more than love to have a second outing at CAS and I doubt UEFA would fancy rerunning this whole two year shitshow. Pearce has admitted confusion over the way payments were made, I am no expert but this seems small beer, them cuunts at Der Nazi know anything on City will generate interest but I get the impression most people are bored with it, as in none City fans. BBC aren’t running with it, maybe others will be it smacks of sour grapes at a time when most of us have enough our plates.
Click to expand...
David Cont makes Colin Swindler seem like a good Blue
 
kaz7 said:
Hardly conclusive as CAS ruled some had been doctored,anything else they put out is probably the same,it is clear the cartel do not want this smear campaign to stop
Click to expand...

I’d be mindful about how we use the term doctored though, we agreed with the veracity of them. It’s not that they wrote anything that didn’t exist.
 
Metalartin said:
What's stopping City physically reclaiming their own property from their possession? I'm no legal expert but I think City's legal rights for their own property would outweigh some German toilet papers journalistic loophole rights.
Click to expand...
It’s not like they’ve got a minibus of ours in their car park. Sadly, data protection law is almost certainly on their side. And culturally, the Germans are very wary of doing anything that might be construed as trying to silence a free press/freedom of expression. The memories of both the Stasi and the Nazis are still fresh enough in the national psyche to make the courts or their regulators unlikely to be seen as interfering in that
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top