Eric Garcia - 2019/20 Performances

[Neville Kneville]

I agree. However, not sure I fully understand why?

Dunno, but I remember Pellegrini doing the same thing when he gave a young player a rare chance, playing Pozo, also a plainly unsuitable candidate, at cf

 

[bluealf]

follow along.

Your reply post to hobbs suggests Ake is all those things. Ake won't be bullied. Savvy?
I could care less about Garcia, I like this trade-off.

Ah American, I presume?

It is 'you couldn't care less, btw or the sentence makes no actual sense in the context you want to illustrate.

It isn't a trade off though is it, Ake was coming in to bolster, Laporte and Garcia and likely another, whilst Otamendi and Stones were sold.

Best not to presume, as I told you what my post was in reply to, 'savvy'. Now move along and bother somebody else for a bit, there's a good chap.

 

[bluealf]

But you completely missed my point. He got game time and was given a chance because he came through the youth team. If the club had watched him put some of those performances in for another team we wouldn't have looked at him. He's simply not good enough.

Again to repeat your own sentence, you miss the point, some of us actually think Garcia looked good and indeed we would have had an eye on him if he played for a mid table team or indeed a team that has just been relegated ie Ake.

A pointless argument now as he is no doubt leaving but just one last point, if he is so shit why are Pep and Txiki willing to risk keeping him for a year to try and get him to change his mind?

Pair of know nothings lol

 

[mikemcfc]

Ah American, I presume?

It is 'you couldn't care less, btw or the sentence makes no actual sense in the context you want to illustrate.

It isn't a trade off though is it, Ake was coming in to bolster, Laporte and Garcia and likely another, whilst Otamendi and Stones were sold.

Best not to presume, as I told you what my post was in reply to, 'savvy'. Now move along and bother somebody else for a bit, there's a good chap.

No, I could care less, but I don't, about Garcia being bullied or not, I wasn't the one who inferred it, merely stating my indifference.
Hobbs thought Garcia would be bullied in the PL. You inferred we bought a similar player for $40 mil. I'm not wrong here,
all I stated was Ake won't be bullied to a part of that, and that I prefer Ake to Garcia.
I have not presumed once. You presume I'm American, I'm not. You presume Ake was only coming to bolster Garcia as a point of fact. it isn't.
And both Otamendi and Stones are going to be sold?

 

[bluealf]

No, I could care less, but I don't, about Garcia being bullied or not, I wasn't the one who inferred it, merely stating my indifference.
Hobbs thought Garcia would be bullied in the PL. You inferred we bought a similar player for $40 mil. I'm not wrong here,
all I stated was Ake won't be bullied to a part of that, and that I prefer Ake to Garcia.
I have not presumed once. You presume I'm American, I'm not. You presume Ake was only coming to bolster Garcia as a point of fact. it isn't.
And both Otamendi and Stones are going to be sold?

What an utter weirdo, is that a presumption or am I just inferring it?

Again don't tell me what I meant in a post to another poster.

Enjoy

 

[mikemcfc]

What an utter weirdo, is that a presumption or am I just inferring it?

Again don't tell me what I meant in a post to another poster.

Enjoy

What was said and what was meant can be different. Opinions.
Why would I watch? I told you I'm not American.

 

[bluealf]

What was said and what was meant can be different. Opinions.
Why would I watch? I told you I'm not American.

But when you are arguing the toss with the guy telling you what he meant then it isn't about opinions is it?

You're telling me what I meant and the best part of it is, the post was not even directed at you but you jumped in with a one sentence comment, I even suggested then your comment had nothing to do with me but you insisted you knew better about what I was meaning, seriously.

The video should do you good, even if you aren't an American it will explain your shit use of the saying 'I could care less'.

Now I have loads of things to do today, so don't feel the need to reply once more, there are only so many times I can explain that you do not know what I meant better than myself.

 

[mikemcfc]

But when you are arguing the toss with the guy telling you what he meant then it isn't about opinions is it?

You're telling me what I meant and the best part of it is, the post was not even directed at you but you jumped in with a one sentence comment, I even suggested then your comment had nothing to do with me but you insisted you knew better about what I was meaning, seriously.

The video should do you good, even if you aren't an American it will explain your shit use of the saying 'I could care less'.

Now I have loads of things to do today, so don't feel the need to reply once more, there are only so many times I can explain that you do not know what I meant better than myself.

no one can reply to an others post? What ever you meant, my post was in context, good day.

 

[bluealf]

no one can reply to an others post? What ever you meant, my post was in context, good day.

If that is what you have taken from this litany of posts then god help you, it really must be hard being a Canuck, everybody mistaking you for a Yank, so annoying.

Now piss off and go and bother somebody else, I did suggest this to you the other day but it seems you're as stubborn as the moose you secretly covet.

 

[mikemcfc]

If that is what you have taken from this litany of posts then god help you, it really must be hard being a Canuck, everybody mistaking you for a Yank, so annoying.

Now piss off and go and bother somebody else, I did suggest this to you the other day but it seems you're as stubborn as the moose you secretly covet.

my op was in context, you have deflected with 3 posts about grammar that have nothing to do with that, good day.

 

[bluealf]

my op was in context, you have deflected with 3 posts about grammar that have nothing to do with that, good day.

Another post full of crap, you are on a roll now.

So 3 posts about grammar, did you not read the ones with the explanations as to why you were wrong?

I guess not, if you nip back a few pages they will still be there for you to read them and finally understand the crux of the situation and why you did not know what I meant from the very first post and onwards.

If you're so imbued with psychic powers, you should be able to know exactly what word I am thinking right now.

Also, not sure why you keep saying 'good day' like you're a stiff upper lipped Thomson and Thompson clone when you can't help coming back snapping and biting like a salmon on a fly.

Toodles hoser.

 

[mikemcfc]

Another post full of crap, you are on a roll now.

So 3 posts about grammar, did you not read the ones with the explanations as to why you were wrong?

I guess not, if you nip back a few pages they will still be there for you to read them and finally understand the crux of the situation and why you did not know what I meant from the very first post and onwards.

If you're so imbued with psychic powers, you should be able to know exactly what word I am thinking right now.

Also, not sure why you keep saying 'good day' like you're a stiff upper lipped Thomson and Thompson clone when you can't help coming back snapping and biting like a salmon on a fly.

Toodles hoser.

Me snapping? I have been polite. My op was in context, Toodles.

 

[bluealf]

Me snapping? I have been polite. My op was in context, Toodles.

Once more you have shown your ignorance with the poor interpretation of my post.

Have another go, go on, you may get it right the second time.

 

[mikemcfc]

Once more you have shown your ignorance with the poor interpretation of my post.

Have another go, go on, you may get it right the second time.

You said, regardless of what you meant, "And yet we have just bought one from a team relegated for 40m." to Hobbs post which included that he thought Garcia would be bullied in the PL. All I did was reference that Ake won't be. How is that wrong? Then you got it wrong thinking I thought Garcia was getting bullied. Nope, All the rest of this is your deal.

 

[bluealf]

You said, regardless of what you meant, "And yet we have just bought one from a team relegated for 40m." to Hobbs post which included that he thought Garcia would be bullied in the PL. All I did was reference that Ake won't be. How is that wrong? Then you got it wrong thinking I thought Garcia was getting bullied. Nope, All the rest of this is your deal.

And yet I told you it had nothing to do with him being bullied and still you are not taking that in, are you mentally deficient or something?

Hobbes also said in that post that 'we wouldn't be looking at Garcia if he played for a mid-table team.'

I replied 'Yet we just spent 40m on one from a relegated team.'

The meaning for the last time is we would have been looking at a talent like Garcia in a mid-table team because we just bought one from a relegated team.

It really isn't that difficult tbh.

So again for the last time, your post that mentions Ake won't be bullied had absolutely nothing to do with my post and you were mistaken for jumping in like a know it all and when told you got it wrong you compound matters by proceeding to spend the next 2-3 days convincing yourself the guy who actually wrote the post was wrong all along.

Now, I am bored to tears with you. so fuck off.

 

[Astrozombie]

thogut someone had tons of stuff to do today...

 

[mikemcfc]

And yet I told you it had nothing to do with him being bullied and still you are not taking that in, are you mentally deficient or something?

Hobbes also said in that post that 'we wouldn't be looking at Garcia if he played for a mid-table team.'

I replied 'Yet we just spent 40m on one from a relegated team.'

The meaning for the last time is we would have been looking at a talent like Garcia in a mid-table team because we just bought one from a relegated team.

It really isn't that difficult tbh.

So again for the last time, your post that mentions Ake won't be bullied had absolutely nothing to do with my post and you were mistaken for jumping in like a know it all and when told you got it wrong you compound matters by proceeding to spend the next 2-3 days convincing yourself the guy who actually wrote the post was wrong all along.

Now, I am bored to tears with you. so fuck off.

Not compromising my initial reply, I will end it.

 

[bluealf]

Not compromising my initial reply, I will end it.

You should have ended it when I told you in the first reply that it wasn't about being bullied, I love to see that you just won't admit that you got it fucking wrong from the off lol not compromising my reply lol

What a prize tit.

 

[bluealf]

thogut someone had tons of stuff to do today...

Are you talking to me?

If you are...

I sanded down two sides of a 17ft by 10ft shed by hand and put two coats of cornflower blue stain on in between all these posts, I also cooked aubergine with basil and feta salad for the wife and BBQ ribs and sweet potato fries for me.

Thanks for your concern about my busy schedule, I would say I accomplished more than most today, all of that on top of clocking into work at 5:30am and doing my delivery round and clocking off at 1:30 pm.

Cheers.

 

[super_city_si]

Are you talking to me?

If you are...

I sanded down two sides of a 17ft by 10ft shed by hand and put two coats of cornflower blue stain on in between all these posts, I also cooked aubergine with basil and feta salad for the wife and BBQ ribs and sweet potato fries for me.

Thanks for your concern about my busy schedule, I would say I accomplished more than most today, all of that on top of clocking into work at 5:30am and doing my delivery round and clocking off at 1:30 pm.

Cheers.

FUck, I feel like a right lazy twat now. Ah well, too late to do anything anyway now.