Don’t tell me...your baby was gone??
CAS judgement: UEFA ban overturned, City exonerated (report out p603)
- Thread starter jimharri
- Start date
Len Rum
Well-Known Member
You were on my mind.
Prestwich_Blue
Well-Known Member
I saw you standing there.
I woke up this morning,
I saw you standing there.
So I looked at you and said,
It's a bit fucking early for a window cleaner isn't it?
A paper from Ulrich's (one of the CAS panel) research assistants, quite critical of the decision. Probably ends the 2-0 argument.
www.lawinsport.com
The duty to cooperate - questions arising from the Man City v UEFA decision - LawInSport
This article is written by Björn Hessert, University of Zurich. By way of disclosure, Björn works as a research assistant for Prof. Dr. Ulrich Haas, who was one of the three CAS arbitrators in the Manchester City FC v UEFA proceedings. Björn would like to stress that he himself was not...
www.lawinsport.com
Uwe Already
Well-Known Member
A paper from Ulrich's (one of the CAS panel) research assistants, quite critical of the decision. Probably ends the 2-0 argument.
The duty to cooperate - questions arising from the Man City v UEFA decision - LawInSport
This article is written by Björn Hessert, University of Zurich. By way of disclosure, Björn works as a research assistant for Prof. Dr. Ulrich Haas, who was one of the three CAS arbitrators in the Manchester City FC v UEFA proceedings. Björn would like to stress that he himself was not...
Ends the argument how? Not willing to sign up for it in case of total twaddle
As in, the guy who's written this article is an assistant to Haas, one of the two non-chair arbitrators. He's gone on criticise the CAS decision. So if Haas thinks similarly too his assistant, it would imply according to @moomba that Haas would have argued/voted against City at CAS. Meaning it's unlikely that majority decisions were 2-0 instead of 2-1/
toffee balls
Well-Known Member
Please don’t take offence , why exactly would you post this.A paper from Ulrich's (one of the CAS panel) research assistants, quite critical of the decision. Probably ends the 2-0 argument.
The duty to cooperate - questions arising from the Man City v UEFA decision - LawInSport
This article is written by Björn Hessert, University of Zurich. By way of disclosure, Björn works as a research assistant for Prof. Dr. Ulrich Haas, who was one of the three CAS arbitrators in the Manchester City FC v UEFA proceedings. Björn would like to stress that he himself was not...
Surely , after 10 fuckin years of thIs bullshit , you could move on.
LongsightM13
Well-Known Member
Thats been posted on here before. The twat thinks we should still have got a ban for non-co-operation
I'm interested to hear what some of the more informed people on here think of his argument.
Perhaps those desperate to move on should do so in other threads and leave people wanting to discuss the case to do so in here.
CelesteItis
Well-Known Member
I'm still on page 703 and my take is that, basically:
1- City scared the shit out of the cartel at the prospect of dominating Europe.
2- The Cartel put a plan together to stop City off the pitch and came out with FFP, meanwhile their refs (Mateu LaHoz et al) would do the dirty work on the pitch. Later on VAR came to their rescue.
3- after moving their own goalposts Uefa crippled Pellegrini's side with sanctions. Khaldoon said we'd take the slap on the wrist. Dipper cunts failed FPP but it was swept under the red carpet.
4- While City being compliant and profitable, the cartel decided to attack again by hiring a hacker. Littlewoods proved it goes unpunished with City's scout system hacked.
5- The hacked emails were leaked by dipper **** Parry to his lap dog Tariq Panja and his minions in the WhatsApp group; and rag scum Gill through german rags hired Der Spiegel to doctor a case for UEFA, one **** Christoff Wankerbaum whats-his-name being the operative.
6- Cartel got giddy and decided "this is it" and proceed to ban City. Incompetent cartel shoot themselves in the foot by leaking the proceeds to Panja and der Spiegel their poorly doctored case.
7- City blatantly disregarded those nosey nine nonces kangaroo court charges and appealed to CAS.
8- City won the appeal, red piss boiling everywhere.
Am I right?
1- City scared the shit out of the cartel at the prospect of dominating Europe.
2- The Cartel put a plan together to stop City off the pitch and came out with FFP, meanwhile their refs (Mateu LaHoz et al) would do the dirty work on the pitch. Later on VAR came to their rescue.
3- after moving their own goalposts Uefa crippled Pellegrini's side with sanctions. Khaldoon said we'd take the slap on the wrist. Dipper cunts failed FPP but it was swept under the red carpet.
4- While City being compliant and profitable, the cartel decided to attack again by hiring a hacker. Littlewoods proved it goes unpunished with City's scout system hacked.
5- The hacked emails were leaked by dipper **** Parry to his lap dog Tariq Panja and his minions in the WhatsApp group; and rag scum Gill through german rags hired Der Spiegel to doctor a case for UEFA, one **** Christoff Wankerbaum whats-his-name being the operative.
6- Cartel got giddy and decided "this is it" and proceed to ban City. Incompetent cartel shoot themselves in the foot by leaking the proceeds to Panja and der Spiegel their poorly doctored case.
7- City blatantly disregarded those nosey nine nonces kangaroo court charges and appealed to CAS.
8- City won the appeal, red piss boiling everywhere.
Am I right?