The Scottish Politics thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter mat
  • Start date Start date
I don’t think you can keep a straight face and state it’s as biased as my article, nor that GERS is fabricating or bending figures to make Scotland worse, whilst “Business for Scotland” are on a level with them.

It’s like comparing ONS data with UKIP’s website.
No I said its as biased as you.
 
If it’s as balanced as I am, surely you’ll be posting my views then in future, on this topic?

The point of using sources is to move away from our own biases on a subject. I used the Guardian because they’re centre left, politically aligned to the SNP and maybe not pro independence but not hostile to it either. You went straight for a source that’s homepage has cartoons on, taking the piss out of and attacking Tories.

I am not suggesting you do anything though, you can post what you like, but I don’t have to take your source seriously, I actually value your opinion more than BFS. I just wanted to highlight you’re posting “Business for Scotland” (all people need to do is check their website) and I’m posting from the Guardian, who by the way are also anti-Westminster at this time.

The conspiracy is that mentioning of the false deficit. I checked online to see if there were any independent sources reporting this and the first Google page just came back with Nationalist publications and smaller website backing independence. That confirmed to be the 7x deficit claim that the Guardian quoted, is actually likely correct.
Ok. So where is it wrong, I have my own views? If its so one sided that should be easy.
 
Oh absolutely I agree.

We have to leave the EU now we voted for it and I’m all for Scotland having a vote to leave the U.K. if they wish to, but only once Brexit has settled down. It wouldn’t be fair to hold the vote in the middle of the UK’s trade discussions, when the SNP themselves said it was once in a generation.

I think they should have a vote following the new parliamentary term in 2024 and if they vote to leave then good luck to them.

I’m not against them being able to do it, I’m against the Yes vote because it’s lunacy.

Thats fair, and while i don't disagree on your point about timing as such, that really is not for anyone to determine other than the Scots, through whoever they elect in the devolved parliament. Why wait for one shitshow to fully unfold to start another (in hope it gets you out of the first one) you could say.

Despite the bluster, Nolicola will absolutely welcome Boris 'refusing' to allow one, as it both buys her time and reactionary support. He might however have been bettervoff calling her bluff though, time will tell i guess.
 
No thats all overseas - 50% EU, 50% other.
There are approx 3.7 million EU citizens in the UK, at the last count, so only
a small percentage of these appear to have gone to Scotland by that reckoning. Only my opinion, but even in the EU, I can't see millions wanting to reside there, still, unless the PM grants another ref, which I doubt, it's all academic anyway.
 
Ok. So where is it wrong, I have my own views? If its so one sided that should be easy.
I have said, the claims of the false deficit is a conspiracy.

It reads as “Scotland doesn’t have a deficit, it’s being made up but if it did, it’d be entirely England’s fault”.
 
I think that’s disingenuous.

You know full well that the BNP was more extreme than UKIP and the Brexit Party. Under Farage’s leadership you were not allowed to join those parties if you were ex BNP.

I don’t like Farage, he’s got completely different views to me and he’s like a character from Dad’s Army... but he’s not Nick Griffin.

He is Nick Griffin in troosers.

And i certainly do think ukip were just as bad as the bnp, just better-spoken. Brexit party, too short lived to truly make that claim on in all fairness, but my point stands, they havnt just disappeared, they have just backed more credible horses.
 
Thats fair, and while i don't disagree on your point about timing as such, that really is not for anyone to determine other than the Scots, through whoever they elect in the devolved parliament. Why wait for one shitshow to fully unfold to start another (in hope it gets you out of the first one) you could say.

Despite the bluster, Nolicola will absolutely welcome Boris 'refusing' to allow one, as it both buys her time and reactionary support. He might however have been bettervoff calling her bluff though, time will tell i guess.
Time will certainly tell you’re right.

I am sticking to my point on when the referendum should take place though. The Scottish voted to stay in the U.K. for a “generation” (Sturgeon and Salmond’s words). They have no right to call one every few years until they get what they want but I do see how the landscape has changed through Brexit. A compromise is to put one into place for the next Parliamentary Term and wait for Brexit to settle.

It would be totally unfair for them to demand one right in the aftermath of Brexit, whilst the U.K. is scrambling around for trade deals, it would also be suicidal for Scotland too, but then again that isn’t a surprise.
 
He is Nick Griffin in troosers.

And i certainly do think ukip were just as bad as the bnp, just better-spoken. Brexit party, too short lived to truly make that claim on in all fairness, but my point stands, they havnt just disappeared, they have just backed more credible horses.
Again, it’s just not true. UKIP was a right wing party, not centre right but not fascist. The BNP was a fascist group and they were banned from UKIP.

If I came out and said the n word I’d be kicked out of UKIP as a potential candidate, I’d have been offered a place at the BNP though.

It’s a little like comparing Corbyn to communists, he’s on that side of the aisle but it’s disingenuous to say he’s the same.
 
Ok so no meat. Just opinions. Let’s leave it there.
It’s not my opinion, Scotland’s deficit has been reported and BFS have said it’s false. It’s their conspiracy and I’m just stating they’ve got no evidence for their claim.
 
Again, it’s just not true. UKIP was a right wing party, not centre right but not fascist. The BNP was a fascist group and they were banned from UKIP.

If I came out and said the n word I’d be kicked out of UKIP as a potential candidate, I’d have been offered a place at the BNP though.

It’s a little like comparing Corbyn to communists, he’s on that side of the aisle but it’s disingenuous to say he’s the same.
Who are you trying to convince, exactly? You surely should be able to understand me.

In the same way that when you see an independence march, you see torches and pitchforks aimed at the English. Or when you see an 18th century poem in a tourist pub in Edinburgh, or an snp speech on autonomy, you see a hatred against the english. However many times anyone tells you that isn't the case, that is what you choose to believe.

Similarly, when i hear ukip, all i hear is the bnp, with slightly (and i fucking stress slightly) less colourful language. Same biggotry. With a a bit of a part-faux economic arguement to cloak it. ditto re brexit party, and the bulk of the arguements on 'freeing' the uk. When someone tells me that getting to pass judgement as a birth right on who should have what rights, based on where they are born, is not xenophobic, all i see is xenophobia.

Sorry, but i will stick with that, bnp/ukip, same sides of the same coin, one has just been slightly more polished, thats all.
 
Who are you trying to convince, exactly? You surely should be able to understand me.

In the same way that when you see an independence march, you see torches and pitchforks aimed at the English. Or when you see an 18th century poem in a tourist pub in Edinburgh, or an snp speech on autonomy, you see a hatred against the english. However many times anyone tells you that isn't the case, that is what you choose to believe.

Similarly, when i hear ukip, all i hear is the bnp, with slightly (and i fucking stress slightly) less colourful language. Same biggotry. With a a bit of a part-faux economic arguement to cloak it. ditto re brexit party, and the bulk of the arguements on 'freeing' the uk. When someone tells me that getting to pass judgement as a birth right on who should have what rights, based on where they are born, is not xenophobic, all i see is xenophobia.

Sorry, but i will stick with that, bnp/ukip, same sides of the same coin, one has just been slightly more polished, thats all.
But the difference is I’m consistent and against both of those movements, and nationalism in general.

Nationalism is nationalism and I dislike it in all forms, it’s just a shame others don’t when their flavour happens to have centre left economic policies.

But accuracy is important within that opposition to it and it is very obvious, even to some Indy supporters in here, that Salmond hated the English more and Sturgeon, whilst possibly still doing so, is very much a moderate compared to her predecessor, which says it all really.

The same with UKIP and the BNP, they share ideas but UKIP is comfortably more moderate. I don’t like either but I despise the BNP more. Just as I despise neo Nazis more than the EDL.

Farage wanted to limit immigration to very low numbers, Griffin said “eventually we’ll have the send them all back”. There’s a world of difference in both statements.
 
So having made the leap in my own mind that ultimately, Scottish independence within the EU is preferable to the status quo, I do look at the steps needed to get there and my biggest concern is ‘are the Scottish government capable of delivering this‘. Will they put together a proposition that will get the support of the nation behind it? How credible, detailed will it be? So many minefields. I would love that they got their ducks in a row with the EU so they could demonstrate a flight path in. I would love a detailed and credible plan that shows the implications of a sterling transition to Euro and a sterling to new currency to euro, the pros and cons of each. How will they negotiate a divorce settlement? what will be the economic 5 year plan look like? Will we get all that. Almost certainly no.

My big question is do they have the bandwidth, the expertise and pure mippage to do this? So I joined the SNP party today and will soon find out what the ground floor looks like.
 
So having made the leap in my own mind that ultimately, Scottish independence within the EU is preferable to the status quo, I do look at the steps needed to get there and my biggest concern is ‘are the Scottish government capable of delivering this‘. Will they put together a proposition that will get the support of the nation behind it? How credible, detailed will it be? So many minefields. I would love that they got their ducks in a row with the EU so they could demonstrate a flight path in. I would love a detailed and credible plan that shows the implications of a sterling transition to Euro and a sterling to new currency to euro, the pros and cons of each. How will they negotiate a divorce settlement? what will be the economic 5 year plan look like? Will we get all that. Almost certainly no.

My big question is do they have the bandwidth, the expertise and pure mippage to do this? So I joined the SNP party today and will soon find out what the ground floor looks like.
All the right questions to be asking and if, at the end of those questions, you think it’s worth it, then ultimately, that’s your right to that opinion/vote.
 
And despite it all, the polls (if polls are anything to believe) continue to show the same thing.

If someone told you 15 years ago that in 2020 Labour would be third in Scotland and comfortably behind the Tories, you’d have laughed in their face. What a sorry state of affairs.
 
If someone told you 15 years ago that in 2020 Labour would be third in Scotland and comfortably behind the Tories, you’d have laughed in their face. What a sorry state of affairs.

Indeed.

If someone told me today they stand any chance of getting back to being a dominant party, i would probably equally laugh it off (in disbelief rather than glee). Will see in 15 years perhaps.
 
All the right questions to be asking and if, at the end of those questions, you think it’s worth it, then ultimately, that’s your right to that opinion/vote.
IMO the most sensible opinion you’ve offered on this thread.

From my Hibernian aspect, I’ve followed the logic of my Caledonian brethren on here and found no hypocrisy nor left wing nationalism in the logic they offer for their leanings in the choices offered to them.

Not all arguments are purely economical but, In their shoes, I would be asking how is best to limit the damage long term, from leaving the EU.
By remaining in a smaller Union or exiting it and hoping to rejoin a bigger Union again.
From an economical view it would come down to which option is more damaging and long term, but there is an emotive element to it too.

Good luck to all involved.
There are no easy decisions and no quick fixes.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top