Gaylord du Bois
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 16 Aug 2010
- Messages
- 30,146
- Location
- Great Umbrage.
- Team supported
- Glory Hunting Blue. Was Chelsea.
You think a contract row between an Anglo-Swedish multinational and the EU is going to affect our future relationship with the EU. I happen to think that the EU and AZ will quietly come to an agreement behind closed doors and the current heated rhetoric will calm down within a relatively short period of time without any long term effects because it’s in no one’s interest for it to drag on.Bollocks - this is the key issue that is going to affect relations between the EU and the UK at the moment
I can understand you being uncomfortable and wanting the issue shunted elsewhere
They can get to fuck.They want to see the U.K. contract is the first step, that’ll dictate if it’s a full blown diplomatic row or remains just one between them and the company.
What if the supplier tells you there are no other contracts that overrule yours, but there is?I hadn’t seen that, just that they believe they’re entitled to some from the U.K. site. If they think their contract overrules another one then that’s ridiculous. I get the fairness argument to an extent but it’s meaningless.
There are clearly some inexperts on here.Obviously this is one for the legal experts to sort and I doubt many who post on here fall into that category.
How do you know it breaks the UK contract with AZ?they are demanding that AZ supply from the UK plant but that the breaks our contract. Media headlnes are more along the lines of EU demands UK supply the vaccine.
they are seemingly now blocking exports of vaccines to us.
Nope, like I’ve said a few times, I think they were stupid.
They can get to fuck.
We are under no obligation to show them anything, it’s between us and AZ.
The fact they’ve only just approved the vaccine is absolutely ridiculous.
If someone told me a bloc was acting in this way during the pandemic, a few months ago, I’d have put a chunk of money on it being Trump’s America.
I suspect AZ thought they could fulfill both contracts without any issues, or at least no major ones.
Perhaps gambled rather than ‘thought’.
At cost, part enabled by the EU payig them £300m.The EU constantly threatening a vaccine manufacturer who are dishing it out at cost as a humanitarian effort and sticking up a border in NI were not what I was expecting from Jan 2021
How do you know it breaks the UK contract with AZ?
According to Katya Adler the EU hasn't paid up."In reality, Brussels has yet to hand over a substantial lump of the promised amount"This stock might not have existed but for the EU's order for and payment for 300m doses upfront.
The UK placed an order and paid 65M of course the stock would have been there.This stock might not have existed but for the EU's order for and payment for 300m doses upfront.
I am not defending AZ in terms of their EU agreement, it’s not where my focus is. I am very grateful for the work they’ve done and by not making a profit in doing it but I can sympathise with the EU being annoyed, even though they have made a mess of it themselves.Absolutely, we can refuse it and will do. Bear in mind the only reason they’ll want to see it is because of AZ though. That interview the CIO did the other day, he either poorly worded his response or was an idiot and I can’t imagine the U.K. were happy at all with it either.
Them only just approving it is irrelevant to the row.
The UK has paid for them.The UK is not producing supplies. AZ is producing vaccines in the UK that the EU has paid for.
Ok - so it cannot be said that they have breached contract on this particular point as it was signed in good faith by both parties.
I’m guessing, from my relatively uneducated position, that the EU are just posturing to try to cover their arses and that actually they haven’t got a leg to stand on?