Corruption in English football?

bobbyowenquiff said:
Even with all the absurd penalties the level of diving in English football is off the scale. Players have realised they can con the VAR team because slow motion replays are distorting reality. Certain players just go down all the time. Cheating has been endorsed by VAR. Why the PL is allowing its product to be destroyed like this I don't understand.
Click to expand...
Nah. Certain players have just realised they'll get a decision before being accused of diving regardless of how ludicrous the dive. Fernandes stamping on a defenders ankle, falling over and getting a penalty a case in point.
 
Surely the club should be asking for an explanation of the Foden non penalty incident given the stories in the press.
There can only be one explanation and it is time it was outed.
So many questions:
who gave the VAR commanders any responsibility to become involved in reviews and why?
why did madley not conduct a review if he felt it was a penalty as reported? Why did he allow a commander to overule something that is clearly his responsibility?
what exactly is the role and responsibilities of these commanders?
under what circumstances do commanders become involved?
why did the commander not think it was a penalty even before the footage was reviewed?

corrupt bastards.
 
bobbyowenquiff said:
Even with all the absurd penalties the level of diving in English football is off the scale. Players have realised they can con the VAR team because slow motion replays are distorting reality. Certain players just go down all the time. Cheating has been endorsed by VAR. Why the PL is allowing its product to be destroyed like this I don't understand.
Click to expand...
How many of them are given to the lesser sides though. It only seems this principle applies to the red shite, anybody else challenging them then it’s a forensic analysis to try and discount it.
 
Saddleworth2 said:
Surely the club should be asking for an explanation of the Foden non penalty incident given the stories in the press.
There can only be one explanation and it is time it was outed.
Click to expand...
We had just been beaten by the rags, and were only drawing 1-1 with the saints at the time of the "incident".

This clearly indicates, that the reason they didn't give the penalty is in the hope that we would drop some more points
in this game thus giving the FA, the broadcasters, betting syndicates and of course the rags more chance of a title race.

Corrupt as fuck.
And this will keep going on until there is someone with some substance that stands up and says "enough is enough" we can't carry on governing football this way
 
Kippax77 said:
We had just been beaten by the rags, and were only drawing 1-1 with the saints at the time of the "incident".

This clearly indicates, that the reason they didn't give the penalty is in the hope that we would drop some more points
in this game thus giving the FA, the broadcasters, betting syndicates and of course the rags more chance of a title race.

Corrupt as fuck.
And this will keep going on until there is someone with some substance that stands up and says "enough is enough" we can't carry on governing football this way
Click to expand...
Sir, you have nailed it in one post. They wanted a closer title race and they hoped we would implode, fortunately we are too fucking good.

But the fact that they tried shouldn't be forgotten
 
mat said:
Nothing to see here....Just allegations of protecting the "product".

I don't want to link *** *** article because I don't want to give them cunts any revenue.
Click to expand...
Is that true? Is there a VAR commander?
 
Blue Mist said:
Sir, you have nailed it in one post. They wanted a closer title race and they hoped we would implode, fortunately we are too fucking good.

But the fact that they tried shouldn't be forgotten
Click to expand...
It was only really close 2 seasons ago cos of some ridiculous decisions going in the dippers favour.
like you say we have to blast it to win, but then get judged for killing football.

I love City for fucking up the corrupt core that exists in English football
 
Eds said:
Begs the questions 1. Why didn't Madley tell Carter to butt out as he had no authority? 2. Why did Carter think he could make such decisions in the first place? 3. How many other times have these 'match commanders' be involved in these types of decisions.

Once again though if the Premier league was transparent and had everyone miked up these issues wouldn't arise as often would they?
Click to expand...
It explains why decisions that may go in our favour barely get a second glance. If they are looking to find against us it’s scrutinised in forensic detail. Who is making those decisions?
 
malg said:
Fuck me. I never knew that. Dodgy as fuck.
Click to expand...
It's only as bad as the media (Sky/BBC/BT) prior to VAR. Look how many times they would show certain incidents on a loop (Aguero on Winston Reid being the prime example) in the highlights package, yet not even show certain incidents.

I've lost count of the amount of times MOTD would cobble their highlights package together to show a game where City won by the odd goal but battered the opposition, and they make it look like we were really luck to 'scrape' a win.
 
The Future’s Blue! said:
How many of them are given to the lesser sides though. It only seems this principle applies to the red shite, anybody else challenging them then it’s a forensic analysis to try and discount it.
Click to expand...
I am not sure. There have been terrible decisions given against all teams which is why I suspect it is a betting market and not slanted to anyone in particular.
 
Football is fixed. Very.

backpagefootball.com

Richard Freeman and the ongoing scandal of doping in football

This week, former British Cycling doctor Richard Freeman was struck off the medical register. In his latest exposé into doping in football, Alan Moore looks as Freeman's time in football - which included working with Sam Allardyce at Bolton Wanderers.
backpagefootball.com backpagefootball.com
 
Isn't it funny how little traction this Sun story got about Real Madrid paying £860,000 a year off books to the owner of a rival club? But of course Real Madrid are European Royalty and have the right sort of owners as far as most of the English media is concerned.
www.thesun.co.uk

Real Madrid paid Brazilian Ronaldo £860k a year WITHOUT contract, report alleges

REAL MADRID paid Ronaldo £860,000-a-year WITHOUT a contract, Football Leaks documents allege. The legendary Brazilian scored 104 goals in 177 appearances as a star of the Galacticos between 2002 an…
www.thesun.co.uk www.thesun.co.uk
 
bobbyowenquiff said:
Isn't it funny how little traction this Sun story got about Real Madrid paying £860,000 a year off books to the owner of a rival club? But of course Real Madrid are European Royalty and have the right sort of owners as far as most of the English media is concerned.
www.thesun.co.uk

Real Madrid paid Brazilian Ronaldo £860k a year WITHOUT contract, report alleges

REAL MADRID paid Ronaldo £860,000-a-year WITHOUT a contract, Football Leaks documents allege. The legendary Brazilian scored 104 goals in 177 appearances as a star of the Galacticos between 2002 an…
www.thesun.co.uk www.thesun.co.uk
Click to expand...
First i have heard of this which shows you that unless its us having mud thrown at, no one in the media is interested.
Seems yet another tax dodge in Spain:
But according to football leaks in documents shared by German newspaper Der Spiegel, it is claimed that Ronaldo was not given a formal contract by the Bernabeu club.

The leak alleges that Ronaldo therefore has not had to declare this income to tax authorities.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top