Why call it “controversial “? Surely you’re not doubting the veracity if the decision? Wouldn’t happen if course if there was no corruption, would have been given offside surely? Unless your talking bollocks! Think I know the answer as does the league table. CORRUPTION CORRUPTION WHO WILL HELP US?so our controversial goal was awarded when the rules were applied correctly.
Are you really that blind that you believe corruption in the game = bent officiating?I see the rules were applied to go against us again tonight. Truly corrupt
Why call it “controversial “? Surely you’re not doubting the veracity if the decision? Wouldn’t happen if course if there was no corruption, would have been given offside surely? Unless your talking bollocks! Think I know the answer as does the league table. CORRUPTION CORRUPTION WHO WILL HELP US?
Love boxing and he’s my all time fave despite all he went through. Used to love watching him in the late night fight night shows on ITV. He epitomised the rags to riches pugilist that I loved to watch. Sadly missed.Johnny, where did you get your name? Being a keen boxing fan for over 50 years, I can hazard a guess. A fine upstanding fellow (wouldn't mind reading his biography though). Do you have his values?
It was offsidei wouldn’t call it controversial the pundits did. Why did they call it controversial? They had 15 minutes to check the rule book & come up with the correct decision.
They’ve made a perfectly good goal seem corrupt or as the referees know apply pressure on their decision making.
It’s done to paint a narrative in the media that we got a favourable decision,when in fact as you mentioned it was the correct decision going by the rule book..i wouldn’t call it controversial the pundits did. Why did they call it controversial? They had 15 minutes to check the rule book & come up with the correct decision.
They’ve made a perfectly good goal seem corrupt or as the referees know apply pressure on their decision making.
Please dont come on a corruption thread and make stuff up, people might say you are ergh corrupt if you do.It was offside
Okay, I must have been alone thinking we’d have the first goal disallowed. Delighted it wasn’tPlease dont come on a corruption thread and make stuff up, people might say you are ergh corrupt if you do.
The offside law has never been changed in respect to what happened tonight. Just because the clowns at BT do not know the law relating to offside does not mean it was offside.
Moss would have looked stupid (and VAR) if they disallowed a perfectly good goal. I know that hasnt stopped them in the past but you can hardly use the fact that he applied the law correctly to prove there is no corruption.