Don Karleone
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 8 Nov 2008
- Messages
- 25,216
- Team supported
- Vampire Squid FC
They are waiting for the largest offer from Sky. Bt, Amazon Prime, Netflix, Bein etc for exclusive rights to there response to fans
Don't forget Disney
They are waiting for the largest offer from Sky. Bt, Amazon Prime, Netflix, Bein etc for exclusive rights to there response to fans
Young boys, grasshoppers Zurich, Red star Belgrade and other shite perhapsNo Germans, no French, who are the other 8 teams going to be?
No not at all. The premier league wound will exist and we would play in it. That is unless something happens where the PL ban usSo to be Crystal. We joining the super league means it’s just the super league. One competition.
no cups at all.
no premier league
just this one competition.
This is your fundamental mistake. It may not matter to you, but it's an error in logic to assume this.i don't understand why all the moaning is about. from what i heard and seen its a reforming of the champions league and not the premier league ?
They claim it's a replacement of the Champions League and would run parallel to domestic leagues.“Who have we got tonight?”
“Barcelona away”
“For fuck’s sake - we’ve already played them 5 times this season!”
They are exactly the same as the cûnts we disspised.Cowards , this is all so unlike us, since when do they not give a shite what we think
??????Quick to turn on it eh?
A bit of both!Is that shooting fish or fishing for discarded shooters in the Irwell ;-)
Think we'd still have the domestic league. Too much money at stake to chuck us and the other 5 teams out
Fukin shit houses
No doubt the European Super League would happen one day but why make it a closed competition? Thats the issue here.Listen we've known each other a while and I respect the head on your shoulders. But I'm left today watching your reaction video and reading your posts and the overwhelming thought is "what did you THINK would happen?".
The European Super League was always going to come up, it's too profitable an idea for it to not keep coming around.
Did you think these investors at City from the other side of the planet who were happy to post the biggest financial losses in the history of the sport were going to purposely hurt their growth by dying on a moral hill of competitiveness? These people who purposely distorted "competition" by their huge investments? There's just not a reality where I could have seen that happening in 2011 let alone 2021.
We've spoken for years about City's desire to be one of the big boys in European football. We've all known that that is what we wanted. That's what we've gotten now. We're locked in for a quarter of a century as one of the giants of the game.
City were never the "cartel busting" force that some on here presented them as. City were out to make money for City and grow the club to be the biggest in the world. That was always their goal from the day the takeover happened. Shit, they literally told us that in the Shiekh's first statement if I remember correctly.
Buried in this thread I've argued that competition doesn't exist in the European football and hasn't done for the last 30 years. But I'm consistently surprised that people who support a club who know better than anyone else that you NEED a billionaire investor just to compete can really talk like there's real competition already and this is a death knell for it. Competition died a decade before City were taken over. City's actions over the past 12 years prove that competition is dead because look at what we had to do in order to compete.
And watching Sky Sports come out against this as a money grab is almost making me vomit. Remember free to air top division football? Sky Sports invented much of the economics of football that led to the death of competition. Now that digital distribution is going to be the major player rather than satellite, and they are not positioned like Amazon are to deliver that content digitally, they've suddenly found some morals about the whole affair.
It never ceases to amaze me how corporations suddenly find morals when it is in their financial advantage to do so.
Pointless, as you say. The BM “player rotation” thread would rammed.The premier league games if go ahead would be an inconvenience to the big 6 and the players would be saved for the midweek "important" games and what would be the point of playing the league games with no qualifying at stake?
Obviously, that’s the main issueThey claim it's a replacement of the Champions League and would run parallel to domestic leagues.
My problem with it is not the impact on the Champions League but that you are always in it and hence it would distort the domestic league more than ever.
Shalke are inNo Germans, no French, who are the other 8 teams going to be?
NEVER thought I’d say this...Gary Neville has more balls than my Club MCFC...I’m deeply ashamed to be a City fan, well, no I’m not..but this ISN'T City anymore, and I think we all know that now...gutted.
See Nevilles passioned speech below here.
Hooray I feel so much better now its only a bit shitterThat's largely the case in the Champions League, bar a few cameo appearances.
No it wouldn't. We will be leaving it, whether of our own volition (the most likely scenario) or we are booted.No not at all. The premier league wound will exist and we would play in it. That is unless something happens where the PL ban us
And who works for a media company which has been amongst the most responsible for happily paying obscene amounts of money to football clubs for televised football rights perpetuating and condoning the ever increasing amounts of greed that encourages?You mean the Gary Neville who owns a lower tier football team that will be hurt by this proposal?