nmc
Well-Known Member
Do we boo the anthem or cheer the anthem next week? It really is too, too confusing...
Sat in our own living rooms it barely matters although booing seems to upset the Boxer dog.
Do we boo the anthem or cheer the anthem next week? It really is too, too confusing...
But it's completely hollow, they don't withdraw if us and Chelsea hadn't already been doing so.
Of course it wouldn't
No communication from the club. What does our communications director do?
Love the rallying call at the back of the masses from Henderson when the battle is won, joker. On the other hand John Barnes was bang on the money for a change.
Basically. Every greedy **** in the game got their fingers burnt yesterday.what’s Barnes said? He’s a bit of a Wally but he’s normally impartial.
It was very 'I did not have sexual intercourse with that lady' (or whatever the exact wording was)...........John Henry video apology now released. Fair play for facing the camera, none of our lot will, but as if anyone is going to accept it.
I overlooked the fact that inexplicably Barca and Real are sticking by the plan, and want to play each other every Wednesday. Fair cop.I don’t want to see us fined... that money would end up in Real and Barca’s pockets. So no.
Probably sat at home in PJs with a coffee just tuned into Sky Sports News and realising what happened last night.
Yep, the idea that "It's The PM Wot Won It" is preposterousOf course we do have a Government that is pretty much clueless in respect of the law or its compliance with it.
I'm not saying it was a plan, I'm saying I'd be surprised if our owners hadn't done scenario planning for signing/not signing and the breakaway happen/not happening.As much as I like the idea that this was a ploy by City and Ceferin to clear the decks of some of the corrupt twats at UEFA who tried to fuck us over last year, I think it's more than a little far fetched. However, there's quite possibly some truth in the bit I've bolded. It could be that we signed up but were also communicating with Ceferin all along - telling him we did it reluctantly and it didn't necessarily mean we were turning our backs on UEFA for good, proceeded to leak info to him from the inside. It's noticeable that in all his criticism the other day he never mentioned City by name, and that statement he made last night straight after City officially announced we were pulling out (almost literally at the same time as our club statement hmmmmm...) couldn't have blown any more smoke up City's arse if he tried. I mean, has he come out and said anything equally gushing about the other 5 clubs? ;)
My mate who is similar age to you Oakie (72 and I know you are 70) doesn't swear but just calls him Marmite as an alternative. I did tell him about his FFS, nickname on BM but never in a million years would he swear, the older generation, don't think I could refrain.That will start again tonight.;)
It seems we panicked and signed thinking we would be left behind.I'm not saying it was a plan, I'm saying I'd be surprised if our owners hadn't done scenario planning for signing/not signing and the breakaway happen/not happening.
I doubt there was much, if anything, in those agreements that was legally binding. The wording of the statements is telling. The clubs weren't withdrawing from the Super League itself as it clearly hadn't got that far; they were withdrawing from the group that was developing plans for the Super League.I overlooked the fact that inexplicably Barca and Real are sticking by the plan, and want to play each other every Wednesday. Fair cop.
Assuming it eventually does totally crumble though, I stand by the notion that all 12 clubs should cough up the “financial penalties” they stuck in their contract, and it should be spread equally amongst every team affiliated with their respective football associations.