VAR - 2020/21

Status
Not open for further replies.
The Harry Kane goal can't be offside because the equipment is not accurate enough to measure distance down to such small amounts. The decision on when the ball is played depends on when you freeze the frame and then the shutter speed. It is only accurate within 13cms in either direction so you have to make allowance for a margin of error of at least 26cms. What is happening is a disgrace.

Allowing PiGMOL to dictate how it is operated is the disgrace , but there is too much vested interest in allowing those crooks to use VAR as and when and how they feel it is
" appropriate ".
 
Allowing PiGMOL to dictate how it is operated is the disgrace , but there is too much vested interest in allowing those crooks to use VAR as and when and how they feel it is
" appropriate ".
It is just not possible to be offside by a few cms because the equipment is not 100 per cent accurate. PGMOL has been pitiful but the clubs seem unwilling to do anything about it even though their "product" is being ruined. The best solution would be to let the referee decide with his naked eye with the help of a replay, and level should always be given as onside.
Pundits keep saying that VAR for offside is a "matter of fact" and not subjective. But that is just a lie because of the flaws in the technology.
 
It is just not possible to be offside by a few cms because the equipment is not 100 per cent accurate. PGMOL has been pitiful but the clubs seem unwilling to do anything about it even though their "product" is being ruined. The best solution would be to let the referee decide with his naked eye with the help of a replay, and level should always be given as onside.
Pundits keep saying that VAR for offside is a "matter of fact" and not subjective. But that is just a lie because of the flaws in the technology.

The club don't appear to take action on so many fronts which is frustrating for our supporters , but the point is if PiGMOL are not forced to implement VAR in the manner in which the football authorities intend it to be used ( sorry is that FIFA ? ) then they will continually use it to suit the likes of the rags and other favoured teams. Imo there is blatant favouritism and the refs and VAR are complicit.

It is a very clear advantage to them and has been for some time. Without the help of pens they would probably have failed to make the top4 and CL either last season or the one preceeding.

These decisions have huge financial implications , and without CL in the last couple of years , the rags would really be in a mes financially.
 
As for the non pen, Gallagher on ref watch just said thats a decision for the on field ref,whats the point of var then? The ref was 20 yards behind play with zouma blocking his view, he should have been told to look at the monitor at least.

Gallagher is just a fucking lying mouthpiece for PiGMOL and their lackies .
 
This weeks corruption will be off the scale
Said that this morning to my work mate. They have the chance to reduce the gap to 4 points. Guarantee we will see the most blatant, cheating, hoodwinkery we have seen since VAR was introduced this week. Liverpool still have an outside shot at top 4, so we all know Leicester are getting shafted tomorrow night. Plus it gives United a boost to close the gap. It's PiGMOL's wet dream.
 
Said that this morning to my work mate. They have the chance to reduce the gap to 4 points. Guarantee we will see the most blatant, cheating, hoodwinkery we have seen since VAR was introduced this week. Liverpool still have an outside shot at top 4, so we all know Leicester are getting shafted tomorrow night. Plus it gives United a boost to close the gap. It's PiGMOL's wet dream.
If anything I would say that Liverpool would be 'aided'. United are firm second, so no need to help them, but Liverpool need a bit of help to get fourth above Leicester and WHU.
 
We need to put the game against Newcastle to bed before half time.

I may be imagining this, but in games where we are at least a couple of goals up and cruising, the referee's seem to stop bothering to f*ck us over
 
I wonder what the 99.7% decision accuracy rate has dropped to this weekend?
Apparently that 99.7 per cent figure is just a made-up figure and has no value at all. PGMOL were challenged on the claim and couldn't back it up with any data. For example the Sterling non-penalty on Saturday would be recorded as a correct decision by the referee. The 99.7 per cent figure is just propaganda. Why is no one prepared to call out PGMOL properly?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.