There’s one thing I 100% know. If he was at City there’s not a chance he would be the most fouled player for the third season a row. We just don’t get the soft fouls.He would have to change the way he plays , he hangs on to the ball too long , draws fouls & creates set piece chances but it is that what we want ? I’d pass on him tbh.
Firstly, I’m not sure it’s going to be Pep’s choice or decision.Does that include Pep if he sells one and buys the other?
That’s true .......but he’d still be on the floor, we just wouldn’t get the free kicks . I just feel he wouldn’t fit this teamThere’s one thing I 100% know. If he was at City there’s not a chance he would be the most fouled player for the third season a row. We just don’t get the soft fouls.
Foden had been the same all night, so Southgate decided to swap one for the other. If he pulled Kane or Sterling and put Grealish on the other side to Foden, they couldn't have doubled up on both of them.
He brings similar things to Foden in terms of running at players, at pace and with skill. Suspect both of them in a team could be a handful, especially with KdB pulling the strings rather than Phillips
He is very bootable to be fair.Haha, they are trying to make it a good thing that he wins fouls, he is supposed to be the messiah but he comes on and does nothing, I guess they have to find a way to hype his performance.
I guess this is what you get for 100m lol.
Haha, they are trying to make it a good thing that he wins fouls, he is supposed to be the messiah but he comes on and does nothing, I guess they have to find a way to hype his performance.
I guess this is what you get for 100m lol.
Haha, they are trying to make it a good thing that he wins fouls, he is supposed to be the messiah but he comes on and does nothing, I guess they have to find a way to hype his performance.
He was the player who got fouled the most on the night.LOL the most fouled player, what the hell does that mean?
I guess this is what you get for 100m lol.
Haha, they are trying to make it a good thing that he wins fouls, he is supposed to be the messiah but he comes on and does nothing, I guess they have to find a way to hype his performance.
and? did we win?, did we score?, did we look like scoring?He was the player who got fouled the most on the night.
I'm just telling you what it meant, you asked.and? did we win?, did we score?, did we look like scoring?
I don't get the obsession with stats, they are irrelevant in many cases.I'm just telling you what it meant, you asked.
Haha, everyone is currently obsessed with Jack Grealish that they are bringing up useless stats to make it seem like he did somethingIs there a new rule, if your fouled 4 times your awarded a goal?
Great players don't spend half a game on their backside, that has always been my reservation about Grealish. A gifted player for sure, but the constant falling to the ground is a major weakness and would drive me crazy watching that every week.Haha, everyone is currently obsessed with Jack Grealish that they are bringing up useless stats to make it seem like he did something
I don't get the obsession with stats, they are irrelevant in many cases.
Getting the most fouls against means nothing.
Fair comment, but I still feel Grealish goes down far too easily and in a top side that is under enormous scrutiny, he will be sussed out quickly and develop a dubious reputation which will affect the referee.The key thing is he is able to draw fouls from the opposition because he gives them a chance of getting the ball then he takes it away from them.
For England he is so far from the opposition goal because of Southgate's inability to play expansive football. Put Grealish in City's team and we will get him the ball around the opposition box. Them fouls with then start to count for a whole lot more.
Stay on your fucking feet. Very annoying trait.Fair comment, but I still feel Grealish goes down far too easily and in a top side that is under enormous scrutiny, he will be sussed out quickly and develop a dubious reputation which will affect the referee.