Irlamblue
Well-Known Member
rooney and Gazza spring to mind..
PmslI think Kaveh would be better voicing Bagpuss instead
I won't have a single saucepan left in the house there's that much 100 degree urine.My clothes won’t fit me by the time this is announced with all this popcorn
I’ve already taken the trouble to explain his marketability which, to be blunt, the average hamster should be able to work out. Now you’re questioning the actual value of PR?But so what what’s the outcome? Revenue.
Now I responded to a comment about Grealish being a superstar off the field, remember that.
Off the field marketing superstardom is all about the ability to create “Net New” shirt sales.
Does Jack Grealish bring us a Superstar’s following off the pitch? and with that a huge addressable market of net new prospects to sell to? I’m not convinced that he does.
Kids will buy shirts with his name on, but they will Manc kids / existing fans picking his name over what they had on the back f their shirts last season. That’s not net new, it’s replacement.
Net new sales come from overseas and emerging markets, which I’m not convinced Grealish has an appeal to given his social media following.
I’m happy to be corrected.
When he goes to sleep, all his friends go to sleep and Emily secretly despises the rag bastardI think Kaveh would be better voicing Bagpuss instead
That’s Iain DoweyI wouldn't mind so much but he's the one in green
Don't leave Kaz, Messi is back onI mean i leave much earlier these days , i will keep an eye out but the cat gif would be tomorrow
Man. Alive. this cannot be true.Imagine hahahahahaaa
Imagine hahahahahaaa
Yes please :)))Imagine hahahahahaaa
Or maybe the hold up is he’s just having his City tattoo finished.Imagine hahahahahaaa
You just have to roll with it ....My respect for Liam has gone up a fair amount, granted it was a low start point but all the same an excellent tweet deserves to be rewarded lol
It's why City fans are the best with a modesty and humbleness that others just wouldn't understand. When Arsenal, Chelsea, Newcastle, even Liverpool etc., were spending big money we wished them well as it meant the rags had a challenge. If what happened to us had happened to similar clubs such as Everton, Leeds, Aston Villa or had already happened at Chelsea and Blackburn we would have said fair play you lucky gits......and we did, 'supporting' Arsenal, Blackburn, Newcastle and Chelsea in particular in their quest to somehow compete against ferguson's spending. The hypocrisy is just incredible and the fire is continually fanned by our darling media. Biggest laugh I had was when the Champions League final was dubbed as a 'dirty money' final by people I know who used to get all giddy admiring Real Madrid 'Galacticos' and a Berlusconi funded AC Milan not so long back. How times and mentality change after some media brainwashing and conversion therapy....The media fucking despise us. People always seem to think that it's a weird conspiracy that City fans have come up with it's absolutely true. I can show you tweets from three broadsheet professional journalists in the last 24 hours who went on long rants about why City are horrible bastards for ruining football by not letting United or Liverpool win everything.
I don't know why people expect anything else. Nobody cared about us in 2010 after the takeover but before we won a trophy. It was all about how nice it will be to see a new challenger and how long suffering fans deserve some success. As soon as we started taking money out of their pocket, we became the worst people in the world.
No thats fair.Sterling is as marketable as Grealish mate, for all of the same reasons.
With the exception of Beckham, there’s now been a single English player who had been a superstar off the field from a marketing perspective. I’m not sure why Grealish would be any different.