The contract with the other team would only take effect from year 2. For the first year we would have loaned him and they would be paying our wages is what I would assume.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
It's Quiet Thread 15 - Txiki Blinders
- Thread starter tolmie's hairdoo
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
Pollocks OG
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Sep 2020
- Messages
- 657
- Team supported
- MANCHESTER CITY
What the fucking hell are you even waffling on about. Does it even matter or does it matter more you proving a point and being right?Why would we retain the registration if the players staying at his new club?
And regardless, in a circumstance where a player is staying put at the receiving club / never coming back, it’s not a loan and can’t be a loan because there’s no return and the clubs accounts will state the future income - as happens in sales where staged payments are received, which was what was described . . as a loan.
Lighten up.
chesterbells
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 15 Apr 2010
- Messages
- 26,851
Wish I’d brought some popcorn.
I too thought he played well against Leicester; and I blame Rodri for ‘causing’ the penaltyI thought he played really well against Leicester, but then obviously messed that up with the mistake at the end.
Mistakes that cost games don't tend to get ignored. He had played well that aside though.
Where’s that cat?Wish I’d brought some popcorn.
nmc
Well-Known Member
Abduls Kebabs in Fallowfield.
I think Harry is more of a Harvester or Berni Inn kinda guy.
Gotta laugh at all the pops people have had at his brother over this.
I wish my brother had set me up for a £5m pay day!!
@Zin 'messiah' Zimmer - get your finger out ffs.
nmc
Well-Known Member
Where’s that cat?
Who knows it might be dead ; )
Bellamy's Caddy
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 26 Jan 2009
- Messages
- 4,654
I thought he played really well against Leicester, but then obviously messed that up with the mistake at the end.
Mistakes that cost games don't tend to get ignored. He had played well that aside though.
I've rated Ake for a long time and was delighted when we signed him. Last season was injury interrupted and whilst he didn't cover himself in glory last weekend, I think people are writing him off too quickly.
I'm not saying he will force his way in to the starting eleven, but he can still be a good addition even if used in rotation. If he stays fit I think he'll prove a lot of people wrong this year.
Last edited:
LucahArchie10
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 May 2013
- Messages
- 2,581
⁹Sookie time?
THB will be back next season, he hasfar more ability than both Garcia & AkeGood comparison. Another defender who couldn't sort his feet out right and ended up with the all-time OG record for a reason.
Ake is far too noticeable in the back line simply because he doesn't squeeze the play, likes to hang back, probably because he doesn't trust himself.
Maybe it is confidence, because Stones was doing exactly the same during his downturn, refusing to take responsibility and being exposed one on one?
But we knew Stones could do it, Ake has no such pedigree and wish we had held on to that £40m.
OccupiedPalestineBlues
Well-Known Member
Its a loan he is still a city player until they paid an agreed fee at that time he becomes their player and signs a contract with them. He may never return but he is still under contract to City and playing under the terms of that contract so its a loan not a sale. Your welcome
You’re obviously not an accountant because it would be recorded as a sale in the accounts (current and future income accounted for), and you’re not practical because something that is loaned has a return factored into the arrangement and if it isn’t coming back it’s obviously not a loan.
I also presume that the whole notion is a figment of a fevered imagination because if a player leaves our club and goes to another on a permanent basis, as was described, then there would be no point in holding the players registration so the registration wouldn’t be pointlessly held.
Your welcome (sic)
PS. And you’re welcome too :-)
nmc
Well-Known Member
Or not, I’m not opening the box though
Someones on my wavelength!
LucahArchie10
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 May 2013
- Messages
- 2,581
Declan Rice next year imo, we get HM & CH in one
True enough. It's hard for any centre back to come into this team and play to a high enough level when they aren't playing regularly. Laporte looked shaky at times last season when 3rd choice and Stones and Otamendi have both been far better when played regularly.I've rated Ake for a long time and was delighted when we signed him. Last season was injury interrupted and whilst he didn't cover himself in glory last weekend, I think people are writing Jim off too quickly.
I'm not saying he will force his way in to the starting eleven, but he can still be a good addition even if used in rotation. If he stays fit I think he'll prove a lot of people wrong this year.
The only one I remember who could play at the top of his game when brought in after long breaks has been Kompany. Players like him are rare and let's face it, if Ake was as good as him he'd play a lot more often anyway and it wouldn't even be up for discussion.
EricBrooksGhost
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 19 Oct 2010
- Messages
- 2,782
It's a loanWhy would we retain the registration if the players staying at his new club?
And regardless, in a circumstance where a player is staying put at the receiving club / never coming back, it’s not a loan and can’t be a loan because there’s no return and the clubs accounts will state the future income - as happens in sales where staged payments are received, which was what was described . . as a loan.
I too thought he played well against Leicester; and I blame Rodri for ‘causing’ the penalty
Rodri wasn't blameless for sure, but we're at our best when as many players as possible want the ball. Ake didn't want it, which is my reason for criticising him as much as him not dealing with it.
OccupiedPalestineBlues
Well-Known Member
What the fucking hell are you even waffling on about. Does it even matter or does it matter more you proving a point and being right?
Lighten up.
I’m light enough pollocks, it’s you throwing accusations of pedantry at a bloke who tried to help you out . . and I’ve been pleasantly humorous in my response to that because I found it funny.
Even you must admit, if only to yourself, that you getting sweary on the topic then advising me to lighten up is pretty damn hilarious.
I've rated Ake for a long time and was delighted when we signed him. Last season was injury interrupted and whilst he didn't cover himself in glory last weekend, I think people are writing Jim off too quickly.
I'm not saying he will force his way in to the starting eleven, but he can still be a good addition even if used in rotation. If he stays fit I think he'll prove a lot of people wrong this year.
That signing went under the radar
OccupiedPalestineBlues
Well-Known Member
It's a loan
If you really believe that nonsense then loan me a couple of grand.
You won’t get it back but that’s cool because, in your weird noggin, it’s a loan and loans don’t have to have any possibility of a return.
But it’s a loan with a compulsion to buy/pay in a year or whatever.If you really believe that nonsense then loan me a couple of grand.
You won’t get it back but that’s cool because, in your weird noggin, it’s a loan and loans don’t have to have any possibility of a return.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.