I get the feeling that if Ronaldo makes himself available then they'd go for him over Haaland.As long as he doesn't go to United.
I'm more okay with that scenario, Ronaldo can't make the runs Haaland does.I get the feeling that if Ronaldo makes himself available then they'd go for him over Haaland.
I’d take him for five seasons. No problem with that.Moves next year and spends a maximum of 5 seasons at his new club.
What has Kane had great performances against all his career? It was mostly weak teams. Frankfurt is one of the best in the Bundesliga again this yearI don't change my mind because haaland had a great game against some bundesliga team.
How do you know this is the reason? Did someone at the "open channel" tell you this is why they are showing that match? Or do you "know" because you just "know" this is the reason?Sorry there’s only so much cliches I can take in one day and they’re off the charts already.
I’m watching this Dortmund game in a Brazilian open tv channel (the one everyone can see anywhere as opposed to cable). They have the option to show one Bundesliga game per round and chose this one, not Bayern. The reason is Haaland. For the poster who asked what a superstar is. It’s someone people tune in to watch. Like Messi, Neymar, Ronaldo, Mbappe. Haaland is already on that bracket. He is fun and literally spectacular. A team that wants to dominate Europe has to be a team that everyone around the world wants to watch play.
And another goal by the guy.
I actually do know people from that channel but no, they didn’t tell me. It’s an obvious marketing decision. Haaland is a star in Brazil already. The commentary is all about him. They will show Bayern games too throughout the season, but I can bet with you Dortmund will be shown more. I’ll keep you posted.How do you know this is the reason? Did someone at the "open channel" tell you this is why they are showing that match? Or do you "know" because you just "know" this is the reason?
Surely its clear this ship has sailed.Otherwise we would not be 100% in for Kane and Chelsea would not have had to settle for Lukaku.
He was made for the Prem,and us,so its a huge shame.....but he has been tapped up by Bayern or,less probably,RM,i suspect.
This donkey thing reminds me of Lukaku which was called that in his thread, and one that should’ve been preferred too. But that ship has sailed and I now hope to have been wrong lol.We’ve backed the wrong horse, I don’t mean horse I mean donkey.
I never got the Lukaku donkey reference.This donkey thing reminds me of Lukaku which was called that in his thread, and one that should’ve been preferred too. But that ship has sailed and I now hope to have been wrong lol.
Agreed!I never got the Lukaku donkey reference.
He has pace a power, something the other donkey doesn’t have.
Still we can always send him out on loan to Blackpool beach.
This lad is a freak. Genuinely gutted we haven't gone all out for him.
I didn't ask if you know people there. I asked if someone told you. The Dortmund v Eintracht Frankfurt match was likely to be better than German rags v Köln. I'd contend this is why the former match was chosen. However, I do not know this as a fact.I actually do know people from that channel but no, they didn’t tell me. It’s an obvious marketing decision. Haaland is a star in Brazil already. The commentary is all about him. They will show Bayern games too throughout the season, but I can bet with you Dortmund will be shown more. I’ll keep you posted.
Lets see where he ends up then.He hasn't been tapped up by anyone, he's just not available until the buyout clause kicks in.
The fees for Kane will be astronomical too. Difference is Haaland could lead the line for 10+ years, and I doubt Kane would last any longer than 2-3 seasons. Wages would be pretty similarThe fees involved are going to be astronomical and even then he could still say no, Dortmund aren't selling this summer and we can't wait a year to find out we can't do the deal anyway.