Harry Kane

TheNews said:
So Grealish is worth £100m but Kanes not worth £160m lol

Get real
Click to expand...
Grealish is 3 years younger, still improving and hadn’t demanded to leave Villa who incidentally aren’t nearly a billion pound in debt

you’re deluding yourself if you think city or anybody will pay £160m

it’ll get done and it will be for nowhere near that
 
TheNews said:
Kane a Very Proven Goalscorer in PL and currently no one comes near him and you say that fee in nonsense, you just paid £100m for a player one of Spurs kids had in his pocket the whole game

Think you need to get real
Click to expand...
In this market 160m is utter madness and I completely understand why the club are in for him, there seems little or no alternative players, but I am far from convinced.
 
chaddblue said:
Grealish is 3 years younger, still improving and hadn’t demanded to leave Villa who incidentally aren’t nearly a billion pound in debt

you’re deluding yourself if you think city or anybody will pay £160m

it’ll get done and it will be for nowhere near that
Click to expand...
Wait and see as if that fee is no paid then Kane will not be wearing a city shirt
 
TheNews said:
Kane a Very Proven Goalscorer in PL and currently no one comes near him and you say that fee in nonsense, you just paid £100m for a player one of Spurs kids had in his pocket the whole game

Think you need to get real
Click to expand...
I did not pay 100m for Grealish and nor did I want him.
 
chaddblue said:
£160m... get real. A ludicrous figure the london media have invented

They’ll be negotiating and he’ll leave for a fee much less than that
Click to expand...
'The News' said we should put in our bid of £160m and then start negotiation!
Interesting way to do the business - is he a Spurs fan?
We should mess them up and bid £100m for Son instead.
 
Keeper! said:
In this market 160m is utter madness and I completely understand why the club are in for him, there seems little or no alternative players, but I am far from convinced.
Click to expand...

Premier League Record​


Appearances245
Goals166
Assists34

And thats at Spurs, imagine what he'd get in a City Shirt and its not like he got all the Spurs Goals as Son has scored boatloads too
 
samuelyeboah said:
it's funny but

I reckon if we actually *did* play false 9 we'd look much better. but we aren't doing that! it requires the wingers to play a lot more narrow with wing backs providing the width, and that's hardly the way we play. Just because we put a midfielder/winger up top.. that's not false 9, that's just "midfielder playing as striker", which, well, looks how it looked yesterday.
Click to expand...
Think that’s a tad harsh on Torres, who made numerous dangerous runs but didn’t get the ball. There was one ball played across the box towards Torres that would have given him a chance but Gundogan intercepted it and the chance went begging. We do need a top striker though, and I’d rather we spent £150m on Haaland
 
BamberBridgeBlue said:
Let’s hope Spurs have done a better job on the two replacements than they did on Pau Torres and checked if the player actually wants to join. After all, you wouldn’t want them spunking the lot on average players. They haven’t done that before.
Click to expand...
Paul Torres has clearly been told to sit tight by a bigger club, with rumours of Laporte leaving before the end of the window, could this be a major surprise deal?
 
TheNews said:
Wait and see as if that fee is no paid then Kane will not be wearing a city shirt
Click to expand...

TBH I couldn't give a sh*t if City paid that £160mill. You, Levy and Spurs will get a £160mill trophy and f*ck all else. Whilst City get 1 of the best strikers in the world, and probably more real trophies.

Liverpool have the net spend trophy.
United have the self-made money trophy.
Spurs will have the Harry Kane-£160mill trophy.
 
TheNews said:

Premier League Record​


Appearances245
Goals166
Assists34

And thats at Spurs, imagine what he'd get in a City Shirt and its not like he got all the Spurs Goals as Son has scored boatloads too
Click to expand...
I have said numerous times, outstanding record and totally get the clubs attraction, but for me as a player he simply does not excite me, not a player I have ever enjoyed watching.

But if he comes in and continues with those figures, fantastic.
 
bobmcfc said:
I can imagine that we are still way below their valuation. I think levy will be even more bullish now after beating us. He will definitely feel like he has the upper hand
Click to expand...
Don't think the game result factors into it, Levy still needs money and we still need a striker. If Levy really wanted to make a statement he would've had Kane in the squad, played him last 10-15 at least while leading, and then had Harry send out some cryptic tweet congratulating his team on the win. Instead he was entirely left out, and I think we know why, his mind's still set on leaving, and we still want him. Dragging it out is common, I mean, now we know Grealish was done for months, but it took its sweet sweet time anyway.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top