I’m pretty sure City put down the deposit with their credit card and cancelled the transaction within fourteen days. So they should be fine.
The Super League | FA + PL: New Charter & Fines | UEFA: Settlement
- Thread starter Ric
- Start date
Wondering what Ceferin is doing to Juve, Real, Barca. He fucking punished the 9 clubs who quit ESL with the "settlement" but as of today the 3 other clubs got absolute no punishment and he may opened some bigger case vs them that was stopped by the some Madrid jury case or something.
So basically they still will play CL this coming season and are currently better off than the 9 other clubs including big 6 in PL.
Any news of that front what Ceferin is planning? He may have wanted to give them 1 year CL ban or similar if they cont come around and bend over for him which they certainly did not do and are not planning too still.
I hope this is not just gonna be buried like nothing happened because at this point its like they punished the good guys who saved Uefa and the CL while nothing happened to the main three guilty ones.
Can we go back then to Uefa we dont accept the settlement or appeal against it as those 3 gets away with nothing as well?
So basically they still will play CL this coming season and are currently better off than the 9 other clubs including big 6 in PL.
Any news of that front what Ceferin is planning? He may have wanted to give them 1 year CL ban or similar if they cont come around and bend over for him which they certainly did not do and are not planning too still.
I hope this is not just gonna be buried like nothing happened because at this point its like they punished the good guys who saved Uefa and the CL while nothing happened to the main three guilty ones.
Can we go back then to Uefa we dont accept the settlement or appeal against it as those 3 gets away with nothing as well?
Paul lakes knee
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 15 May 2012
- Messages
- 160
Real Madrid taking legal action against Tebas
M18CTID
Well-Known Member
City should've done that ages ago. Albeit for different reasons!
Pablo ZZZ Peroni
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 19 May 2014
- Messages
- 2,656
Not just City - all 6 English clubs, 2 Milan clubs and Atletico.
ECA Executive Board accepts Clubs’ requests to retain ECA membership
Following the receipt by ECA of specific requests asking the ECA Board to consider the withdrawal of their previous resignation requests of April 2021, the ECA Executive Board has agreed that the following clubs will retain their ECA ordinary membership for the current 2019-23 ECA membership...
www.ecaeurope.com
So back into the UEFA/ECA fold......
M
M
mat
Guest
Lovely.Not just City - all 6 English clubs, 2 Milan clubs and Atletico.
ECA Executive Board accepts Clubs’ requests to retain ECA membership
Following the receipt by ECA of specific requests asking the ECA Board to consider the withdrawal of their previous resignation requests of April 2021, the ECA Executive Board has agreed that the following clubs will retain their ECA ordinary membership for the current 2019-23 ECA membership...
So back into the UEFA/ECA fold......
Can't wait to see what shit they'll try and pull on us this time.
They Shouldn't give it a fancy name. Just be honest and say this is project fuck Man City.
bitterfuse
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 20 May 2013
- Messages
- 137
I hope they sue the ****
JGL07
Well-Known Member
The only way for a Superleague to happen will be for clubs to leave their domestic league.
The threat of legal action will not work because the domestic calendar could be set up to disadvantage their rebels.
There isn’t a hope in hell of a Superleague replacing domestic leagues because unless the clubs accept a NFL-style short sharp season, there will not be enough matches.
How many supporters would pay to watch the same bunch (16?) of teams play each other again and again?
The US owned. Clubs probably think that they can get away with such an approach. I don’t see the likes of City and Chelsea falling for it, neither will PSG or any of the German clubs.
The proposed CL format looks bad enough for me.
The threat of legal action will not work because the domestic calendar could be set up to disadvantage their rebels.
There isn’t a hope in hell of a Superleague replacing domestic leagues because unless the clubs accept a NFL-style short sharp season, there will not be enough matches.
How many supporters would pay to watch the same bunch (16?) of teams play each other again and again?
The US owned. Clubs probably think that they can get away with such an approach. I don’t see the likes of City and Chelsea falling for it, neither will PSG or any of the German clubs.
The proposed CL format looks bad enough for me.
M
M
mat
Guest
The Premier League holds all the cards and the rest know it. As you say I can't see their version of an ESL happening. Although I can see UEFA trying to pander for one.
But the UEFA c*nts spent nearly a decade trying to destroy City through their own kangaroo committees and a (independent) Swiss Court.(CAS)
www.dailymail.co.uk
UEFA drop legal action against Real Madrid, Barcelona and Juventus
UEFA confirmed it has declared court proceedings 'null and void' against Real Madrid, Barcelona and Juventus. The six Premier League teams will be told they no longer have to pay fines.
I think this wording is very deliberate because of all the time limits around UEFA investigatory proceedings.
By making the appeals procedure null and void, it means they aren't subject to the time limits for punishments if/when the ECJ eventually falls in favour of UEFA.
The Super League is an existential threat to UEFA, they aren't going to just let it happen or stop fighting it.
SilverFox2
Well-Known Member
Action against City was driven mainly by the hubris of its main members.
When a legal CAS decision went against them and their kangaroo court meant little perhaps it was a wakeup call for the future?
When a legal CAS decision went against them and their kangaroo court meant little perhaps it was a wakeup call for the future?
Centurions
Well-Known Member
Yep, no way UEFA are just walking away. They're just changing their angle of attack.
bobbyowenquiff
Well-Known Member
I am not sure UEFA have a legal leg to stand on. Essentially a court has just ruled that UEFA have no authority to prevent any clubs setting up their own league if they want to. Nor do they have the legal right to sanction any clubs for quitting. It is only a matter of time before the super league comes back in a format which guarantees domestic pyramids and wins support from a majority of clubs.
The current situation where UEFA is a financial competitor for broadcasting money with the clubs they are supposed to regulate is corrupt and untenable. The new proposals for the CL will be the straw that breaks the camel's back. The clubs are already angry about Wenger's crazy ideas for the FIFA World Cup. UEFA and FIFA both face extinction. Football is the product and it is owned by the clubs not the political fat cats.
its a Barm
Well-Known Member
And when the super league comes back what will City do will they ask the fans first before deciding, I think not.
M
M
mat
Guest
Talkshite saying UEFA are looking at removing the judge who made the verdict due to "Irregularities"
Probably a Madrid season ticket holder.
Probably a Madrid season ticket holder.
blue b4 the moon
Well-Known Member
Fucking chicken shits.
Imagine if we were the ring leader where this story would be going.